HSQLDB Cached Table Versus Memory Table Performance & Conversion

HSQLDB Cached Table Versus Memory Table Performance & Conversion

Note: This article will be emailed to your friend.

In short in HSQLDB cached table sucks in terms of performance. To elaborate I was running a program which takes around 9 hours running on two medium sized cached tables (bigger one 163 MB). I changed the tables to memory tables (default) and it now takes less than 10 minutes. Let’s see how we can [...]

Read the rest of this article (336 words)

Please fill in the following fields

* - Required

Your Name: *

Your E-Mail: *

Your Remarks:

Friend's Name: *

Friend's E-Mail: *

Protected by Comment Guard Pro