HANGZHOU, China - Since the claim against Zong Qinghou, Chairman of Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co, Ltd., brought by two subsidiaries of Danone, Myen Pte. Ltd. and Festine Pte. Ltd., was rejected by the Henan Provincial High Court on April 10, 2009, the Liaoning Provincial High Court, on April 27, delivered its final judgment on the “non-compete” obligation case brought by Singapore Novalc Pte Ltd, another subsidiary of Danone, against Zong, in which the claim was rejected and the original judgment was sustained. So far, Danone has been defeated by Wahaha three times consecutively in a single month, with all the 24 ruled cases between the two parties ending against Danone.
Retrospect on first instance: Not reconciled to losing the lawsuit, Danone delivered announcement
In 2007, Novalc Pte Ltd submitted a lawsuit to the Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court in Liaoning province against Zong’s action in setting up Shenyang Wahaha Dairy Co Ltd and acting as the chairman.
On August 10, 2008, the Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court ruled in favor of Wahaha as the court of first instance ((2007), No. 43), with Novalc Pte Ltd’s claim overruled. According to the court, Novalc Pte Ltd and a third party (Xiamen Wahaha Food Co Ltd) were aware of, and agreed with Zong’s position in Shenyang Wahaha Dairy Co Ltd, and that the dairy company did not constitute competition against Xiamen Wahaha. As a result, Zong did not violate the board director’s “non-compete” obligation.
Later, Danone disagreed with the court ruling with a public announcement on August 31, commenting that, “The court erred in failing to identify key facts of the lawsuit”, and appealed to the Liaoning Provincial High Court.
Original judgment was sustained in second instance: Danone suffered its 24th defeat
The key point of the dispute is if the appellee Zong’s action in setting up Shenyang Wahaha Dairy Co Ltd and acting as its chairman has violated the non-compete clause and harmed the interests of its joint venture Xiamen Wahaha.
On March 3, the Liaoning Provincial High Court heard the case brought by Novalc Pte Ltd, whose grounds of appeal were as follows: 1. The first trial made a mistake by ruling that the appellant was aware of, and agreed with Zong’s position and shareholding behavior in the non-joint venture; 2. The first trial slid over facts adverse to the appellee; 3. The first trial erred in deeming there doesn’t exist competition relationships between the non joint-ventures including Shenyang Wahaha Dairy Co Ltd and Zhejiang Wahaha Changsheng, and Xiamen Wahaha; 4. The first trial was made based on wrong legal standing.
On April 27, the court issued the second instance decision, affirming in the (2009) No. 17 judgment that:
1. The accounting statements and audit reports of Hangzhou Wahaha Health Food Co., Ltd. for 2005 and 2006 provided by PricewaterhouseCoopers can ascertain the existence of Shenyang Wahaha Dairy Co Ltd, and showed that they were affiliates controlled by the same key management personnel (i.e. Zong). Novalc Pte Ltd, as a shareholder, should have been aware of Zong’s position in Shenyang Wahaha Dairy Co Ltd when the audit reports were delivered to shareholders.
In addition, it can be seen from the fact “Wahaha Group and the food company inked in October 2005 an amendment agreement to the trademark licensing contract, allowing the non-joint ventures including Shenyang Wahaha Dairy Co Ltd to use the ‘Wahaha’ trademark, and Emmanuel Faber signed on the agreement”, that the appellant was fully aware of the existence of Shenyang Wahaha Dairy Co Ltd.
2. The appellant’s claim of Zong’s violation in other non joint-ventures doesn’t share the legal relationship with this case; therefore, it should not be heard in this case. It was appropriate for the first-trial court to ascertain the trial scope according to the indictment.
3. Horizontal competitions are mainly represented in raw material supply, product manufacturing and marketing. From the audit reports of Hangzhou Wahaha Health Food, we can find that all of the products from Xiamen Wahaha and Shenyang Wahaha Dairy Co Ltd were acquired and sold by Hangzhou Wahaha Health Food. Although their business core registered with the industrial and commercial department intersects, the two companies differ greatly in products and sales areas. For this reason, there is no competitive relationship between them. Shenyang Wahaha Dairy Co Ltd, which made normal incomes in the operation system arranged by the joint ventures, didn’t cause any damage to Xiamen Wahaha.
4. About legal standing. It is not always the case that a board director who holds positions in enterprises engaging in similar business will violate the “non-compete” obligation. It is appropriate for the first trial to judge a board director’s violation of the “non-compete” obligation or not by considering the existence of competitive relationship.
To sum up, the Liaoning Provincial High Court affirms that the judgment of the first trial was made based on “ascertained facts and correct legal standing”, thus rejecting the appeal and sustaining the original judgment.
News link:
The following is a news report from a China leading news portal: en.china.cn/content/d554584,78b830,d2098_18772.html
Source: Wahaha Group
Baoxiu Ye at +86-10-8886-5353 x8832 or bx.ye at insightpr.com.cn
Related Press Releases
i4i Case Heard in Court of AppealsSeptember 22nd, 2009 WASHINGTON - Today, in the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, in Washington D.C., a panel of three judges heard the appeal of i4i v. Microsoft. This was an appeal from the August 11, 2009 Final Judgment that ruled in favor of i4i and found that Microsoft had willfully infringed i4i's U.S.
Occlutech and IZASA Obtains Favourable Ruling in Proceeding Initiated by AGA Medical in SpainSeptember 20th, 2009 ZURICH - Occlutech AG, the leading European developer of products for septal closure, today announced that, together with its partner in Spain IZASA SA, it defeated a request for an injunction against sales and marketing activities in Spain, launched at the Commercial Court I of Barcelona, Spain by its U.S. competitor AGA Medical.
Northern Rock Appeal Process ContinuesJuly 27th, 2009 LONDON - Although the appeal by SRM Global and other former shareholders in the Northern Rock case was today rejected by the Court of Appeal, the litigation continues and may ultimately go to Europe. The shareholders were appealing against the Divisional Court's decision to refuse a judicial review of the fairness of the Government's scheme to compensate former shareholders.
KPMG Issues Apology Statement Regarding Wahaha CaseJune 29th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China -
On June 27, 2009, a statement was issued by KPMG Huazhen and its Guangzhou branch regarding a public apology to Suqian Wahaha Beverage Co.Ltd. and two other companies.
KPMG's Appeal Rejected by Jiangsu Higher People's Court, Marking Danone's Seventh Loss to Wahaha in Three MonthsJune 24th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China -
The Higher People's Court of Jiangsu Province recently rejected the appeal lodged by KPMG and its branch firm in Guangzhou and ruled that the original verdict shall be upheld, which marks the end of the hot "KPMG Case" -- Danone vs Wahaha, as well as Danone's 7th loss to Wahaha in three months, considering the same verdicts made for the previous "Henan Case", "Liaoning Case" and "Trade Mark Case". About the KPMG Case
The case dates back to Nov., 2007, when Danone filed a lawsuit in the British Virgin Islands (hereinafter referred to as "BVI") and Samoa, against Wahaha's foreign shareholders of non-Wahaha joint ventures that have nothing to do with the "Danone - Wahaha" dispute, claiming these shareholders had conducted a "co-conspiracy" with Wahaha to conduct fraud against Danone.
Final Judgment of Hangzhou Intermediate Court: Rejects the Application From DanoneJune 17th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China - Ownership of "Wahaha" Trademark Belongs to Wahaha Group After Danone Suffers 38th Defeat
May 21st, 2009, Hangzhou Intermediate People's Court of Zhejiang Province made the Final judgment to reject the application from Danone on the revocation of No. 207 ruling of Hangzhou Arbitration Commission (2007).
Court in Rotterdam Confirms NMA FineJune 11th, 2009 NIEUWEGEIN, The Netherlands - In the appeal procedure the court in Rotterdam has confirmed the fine of 7,9 million euros for Ballast Nedam as imposed by the NMA (Netherlands Competition Authority). Subject of the appeal procedure was the amount of the fine for summary offences of the competition laws in the period 1998-2000.
An International Litigation Draws Attention From China and Europe - Danone-Wahaha Feud: The Cornerstone of World EqualityMay 28th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China - Following the successful completion of the China-EU high-level economic and trade dialogue, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao recently went to Prague for the China-EU summit, marking that Sino-EU cooperation has returned to the right place after suffering a temporary setback last year. In China, however, the two-year-long lawsuit between the country's largest food and beverage giant, Wahaha Group, and famous European-based Groupe Danone is still continuing.
Henan Provincial High Court Dismisses Danone's AppealApril 28th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China - Wahaha Defeats Danone by 23:0
On 10 April 2009, the Henan Provincial High Court in the second instance decision rejected the claim against Zong Qinghou, Chairman of Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co, Ltd., brought by two subsidiaries of Danone, Myen Pte. Ltd. and Festine Pte.
Wahaha Reviews 21:0 Whitewash Against DanoneApril 12th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China - The 3-year dispute which resulted in a series of worldwide lawsuits between two beverage giants, China's Wahaha and Danone, the biggest international war in scale since China's reform and opening up, is expected to come to a close with the final verdict from the arbitration court in Sweden, of which both parties are quietly awaiting. Among numerous court cases worldwide, Wahaha had so far taken the upper hand by winning 21-0 of the Wahaha VS Danone cases.
Related News
Mexico's Supreme Court dismisses appeal of military jurisdiction in crimes against civiliansAugust 11th, 2009 In Mexico, challenge of military courts failsMEXICO CITY — Mexico's Supreme Court has dismissed an appeal against the practice of allowing military courts to judge soldiers involved in crimes against civilians. The court says it rejected an appeal by a woman whose husband was shot by soldiers in northern Sinaloa state in 2008 because she lacks legal standing to file the appeal.
Malaysian Court dismisses HINDRAF leader's petition for releaseMarch 12th, 2009 PUTRAJAYA - Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) leader P. Uthayakumar's appeal on his second habeas corpus application to secure his release from detention under the Internal Security Act has been dismissed by a federal court.
Arbitrator dismisses cyclist Rasmussen's appeal against doping banJanuary 22nd, 2009 LAUSANNE - The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) dismissed cyclist Michael Rasmussen's appeal against the two-year ban he received for doping from the Monegasque Cycling Federation (FMC) last June. 'Consequently, Michael Rasmussen is suspended for a period of two years, starting on 26 July 2007,' said CAS in a statement Thursday.
UK court dismisses requests against US extradition in connection with '98 embassy bombingsAugust 7th, 2009 Terror suspects lose case against US extraditionLONDON — A British court has dismissed motions by two terror suspects asking not to be extradited to the United States. Khalid al-Fawwaz and Abel Abdel-Bary are wanted in the U.S.
Asia's largest iron ore deposit discovered in ChinaJune 25th, 2009 NEW DELHI - Geologists have discovered 'Asia's largest' iron ore deposit in northeast China's Liaoning province, with an estimated reserve of more than 3 billion tons. The newly-found deposit, mainly between 1,200 meters and 1,860 meters underground and spanning a four-km-long, three-km-wide area, is at the Qiaotou Township, Pingshan District, Benxi city, according to Yu Wenli, head of the Liaoning Provincial Bureau of Geology and Mineral Resources Exploration.
Vancouver Canucks owner scores victory in Supreme Court of CanadaJuly 16th, 2009 Canucks ownership dispute settled in top courtOTTAWA — The owner of the Vancouver Canucks scored a victory in Canada's top court regarding his hold on the team. The Supreme Court of Canada has sided with Francesco Aquilini, dismissing an appeal from two Vancouver businessmen.
China executes former airport chief for embezzlement of state fundsAugust 7th, 2009 JINAN - The former chairman and general manager of the Capital Airports Holding Company (CAH) Li Peiying, who was convicted for taking bribes and embezzlement of state funds, was executed on Friday in Jinan, China. Earlier, the Shandong Provincial Higher People's Court had upheld Li's death sentence.
China declares drought emergency as crops threatenedAugust 15th, 2009 BEIJING - A severe drought threatens 8.3 million hectares of crops in northern China, which produces 30 percent of the country's autumn grain output, the agriculture ministry said Saturday. The ministry Saturday declared a third-level emergency in response to the drought.
Supreme Court refuses to hear appeal from man convicted of raping 15-year-old girlJune 1st, 2009 Court won't hear appeal from man convicted of rapeWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court won't hear the latest appeal from a man convicted in the rape and killing of a 15-year-old Kansas City girl. The high court on Monday refused to hear an appeal from Michael A.
Supreme Court to decide whether to limit 'business method' patentsJune 1st, 2009 Court to decide whether to limit patentsWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has decided to take on an appeal that could decide whether someone can get a patent for a complex business idea. The high court on Monday decided to hear an appeal from Bernard Bilski and Rand Warsaw, who attempted to patent a method for managing weather-related risk having to do with trading in commodities.
