Prne
June 17th, 2009
HANGZHOU, China - Ownership of “Wahaha” Trademark Belongs to Wahaha Group After Danone Suffers 38th Defeat
May 21st, 2009, Hangzhou Intermediate People’s Court of Zhejiang Province made the Final judgment to reject the application from Danone on the revocation of No. 207 ruling of Hangzhou Arbitration Commission (2007). At this point, the dispute over ownership of trademark “Wahaha” between Danone and Wahaha is finally settled, adding a new defeat to Danone’s history.
Dispute over “Trademark Transfer Agreement” and Danone’s first application was rejected.
After the Danone-Wahaha disputes occurred, the ownership of trademark “Wahaha” was a focus of the contention between the two sides. Danone considered that the “Trademark Transfer Agreement” signed between the two sides in 1996 was still valid, and requested Wahaha to perform the agreement and transfer the trademark to the joint venture company. However, Wahaha thought that the National Trademark Office did not approve the transfer and the two sides had terminated the “transfer agreement” through signing the “trademark use license contract”. Thus, Wahaha was not obliged to transfer the trademark. To clear this point, shortly after the dispute, Wahaha submitted an application to Hangzhou Arbitration Commission for arbitration, requesting to confirm that the “Trademark Transfer Agreement” had been terminated. On December 2007, Hangzhou Arbitration Commission made a ruling that the “Trademark Transfer Agreement” was terminated on December 6, 1999. Danone defied the decision and applied to Hangzhou Intermediate Court for revocation. On July 30th, 2008, Hangzhou Intermediate Court ruled that the grounds of the application made by Danone were false and that the original decision was valid.
Sophistry “home” and “abroad”, Danone took the initiative to apply for arbitration
Shortly after Wahaha filed the above-mentioned case for arbitration, Danone claimed as follows: Even if, as said by Wahaha, the National Trademark Office did not approve the transfer, which caused termination of the “transfer agreement”, the “transfer agreement” not only stipulated that Wahaha should transfer the trademark “Wahaha” registered in China to the joint venture, but also stipulated that Wahaha is obliged to transfer the trademark “Wahaha” registered overseas, while transfer outside China did not require approval of the National Trademark Office, so Wahaha is obliged to transfer the trademark registered abroad. Hereby Danone took the initiative to bring the arbitration up to Hangzhou Arbitration Commission, requesting Wahaha to transfer the trademarks registered abroad. This formed the strange situation of “one contract, two cases”.
Regarding the case Danone filed for arbitration, Hangzhou Arbitration Commission made a ruling in September 2008, which rejected the request of Danone. The arbitral tribunal indicated in the verdict that the rights and obligations on the transfer of trademark involved in the “Trademark Transfer Agreement” were stipulated in the same contract, and the arbitral tribunal confirmed on December 6th, 2007 that the agreement had been terminated from December 6th, 1999. Therefore all the rights and obligations in the “Trademark Transfer Agreement” have been terminated. Thus, the basis of the legal relationship requested by Danone has been lost.
Refused to accept the arbitral decision, Danone re-applied to cancel the ruling
Danone was dissatisfied with the arbitral decision, and applied to Hangzhou Intermediate Court for revocation of the ruling. Hangzhou Intermediate Court accepted and registered the case on April 7th, 2009. After inspection, Hangzhou Intermediate Court believed that the application of Wahaha Food Company (i.e. the joint venture under control of Danone, and the litigation representative was Fan Yimou) for revocation of the arbitral decision is based on the provisions of Article 58.1.6 of the “Arbitration Law of People’s Republic of China”: “the arbitrator accepted bribes or done malpractice for personal benefits or perverted the law in the arbitration of the case”, but Danone simply provided no facts on the perverting of law on ruling. Hangzhou Arbitration Court affirmed the legitimacy and impartiality of the arbitration and maintained the original ruling.
Legal Adviser of Wahaha Group, lawyer Yang, said that the ruling was a final judgment of the ownership of trademark “Wahaha”. Whether the trademark “Wahaha” is registered in China or abroad, it belongs to Hangzhou Wahaha Group. At this point, the disputes over the “Trademark Transfer Agreement” between the two sides are settled.
Source: Wahaha Group
Baoxiu Ye at +86-10-8886-5353 x8832 or bx.ye at insightpr.com.cn
Filed under Consumer Products, Food / Beverages, Government and Policy, Law, Non-Alcoholic Beverages | Tags: China, Hangzhou, Scandinavia, Wahaha Group, Western Europe | Comment Below
Related Press Releases i4i Case Heard in Court of AppealsSeptember 22nd, 2009 WASHINGTON - Today, in the United States Federal Circuit Court of Appeals, in Washington D.C., a panel of three judges heard the appeal of i4i v. Microsoft. This was an appeal from the August 11, 2009 Final Judgment that ruled in favor of i4i and found that Microsoft had willfully infringed i4i's U.S. Microsoft Willfully Infringed i4i Patent Permanent Injunction Against WordSeptember 14th, 2009 TORONTO -
- (i4i v Microsoft - Case Summary)
On August 11, 2009, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Tyler Division, the Honorable Leonard Davis issued a Final Judgment in i4i v. Microsoft Corporation. Northern Rock Appeal Process ContinuesJuly 27th, 2009 LONDON - Although the appeal by SRM Global and other former shareholders in the Northern Rock case was today rejected by the Court of Appeal, the litigation continues and may ultimately go to Europe. The shareholders were appealing against the Divisional Court's decision to refuse a judicial review of the fairness of the Government's scheme to compensate former shareholders. Johal Dairies Refused Permission to Appeal in Case Against J.N.DairiesJuly 20th, 2009 WOLVERHAMPTON, England -
- In relation to the High Court case of J.N.Dairies Ltd (Claimant) v Johal Dairies Ltd (1st Defendant) & Gurbir Singh (2nd Defendant)
- Judgment Laid Down on 12 June 2009, 10:30am at the Royal Courts of Justice (High Court), London
Johal Dairies were yesterday refused permission to appeal against a High Court judgment which found that they had paid an illegal immigrant GBP40,000 to steal confidential customer information from rival dairy supplier J.N.Dairies. Today's hearing followed an extraordinary 8 day trial at Birmingham Civil Justice Centre between 10 and 19 March 2009 at which the Court found that Wolverhampton and Leicester based Johal Dairies had paid an illegal immigrant, Gurbir Singh, GBP40,000 to steal information from J.N.Dairies that contained the volumes, addresses and prices that it was supplying its customers, which Johal Dairies then used in price negotiations to unlawfully win J.N.Dairies' business. KPMG's Appeal Rejected by Jiangsu Higher People's Court, Marking Danone's Seventh Loss to Wahaha in Three MonthsJune 24th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China -
The Higher People's Court of Jiangsu Province recently rejected the appeal lodged by KPMG and its branch firm in Guangzhou and ruled that the original verdict shall be upheld, which marks the end of the hot "KPMG Case" -- Danone vs Wahaha, as well as Danone's 7th loss to Wahaha in three months, considering the same verdicts made for the previous "Henan Case", "Liaoning Case" and "Trade Mark Case". About the KPMG Case
The case dates back to Nov., 2007, when Danone filed a lawsuit in the British Virgin Islands (hereinafter referred to as "BVI") and Samoa, against Wahaha's foreign shareholders of non-Wahaha joint ventures that have nothing to do with the "Danone - Wahaha" dispute, claiming these shareholders had conducted a "co-conspiracy" with Wahaha to conduct fraud against Danone. An International Litigation Draws Attention From China and Europe - Danone-Wahaha Feud: The Cornerstone of World EqualityMay 28th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China - Following the successful completion of the China-EU high-level economic and trade dialogue, Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao recently went to Prague for the China-EU summit, marking that Sino-EU cooperation has returned to the right place after suffering a temporary setback last year. In China, however, the two-year-long lawsuit between the country's largest food and beverage giant, Wahaha Group, and famous European-based Groupe Danone is still continuing. Liaoning Provincial High Court Dismisses Danone's Appeal, Wahaha Defeats Danone 24:0May 17th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China - Since the claim against Zong Qinghou, Chairman of Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co, Ltd., brought by two subsidiaries of Danone, Myen Pte. Ltd. and Festine Pte. Court of Appeal Upholds Landmark Ruling on Age Discrimination Against Rolls RoyceMay 13th, 2009 LONDON - Unite the Union, Britain's biggest union, has today (14 May 2009) succeeded in securing a landmark judgment from the Court of Appeal against Rolls Royce in one of the first cases on age discrimination to be considered by the higher courts. The Court of Appeal handed down its landmark judgment upholding Unite's resistance to an appeal by Rolls Royce against the decision of the High Court which declared that the use of length of service as one of a number of redundancy selection criteria was not age discrimination. Henan Provincial High Court Dismisses Danone's AppealApril 28th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China - Wahaha Defeats Danone by 23:0
On 10 April 2009, the Henan Provincial High Court in the second instance decision rejected the claim against Zong Qinghou, Chairman of Hangzhou Wahaha Group Co, Ltd., brought by two subsidiaries of Danone, Myen Pte. Ltd. and Festine Pte. Wahaha Reviews 21:0 Whitewash Against DanoneApril 12th, 2009 HANGZHOU, China - The 3-year dispute which resulted in a series of worldwide lawsuits between two beverage giants, China's Wahaha and Danone, the biggest international war in scale since China's reform and opening up, is expected to come to a close with the final verdict from the arbitration court in Sweden, of which both parties are quietly awaiting. Among numerous court cases worldwide, Wahaha had so far taken the upper hand by winning 21-0 of the Wahaha VS Danone cases.
Related News Pakistan court rejects ex-cricketer Ahmed's bail application againApril 22nd, 2009 Court rejects Ahmed's bail applicationLAHORE, Pakistan — A Pakistani court on Wednesday rejected a bail application by former test cricketer Ijaz Ahmed. "We have not received the detailed judgment, but yes our (bail) application was today rejected," Ahmed's lawyer, Kashif Javed, told The Associated Press. Court rejects Ansals' plea to get back Uphaar cinema hallMarch 22nd, 2009 NEW DELHI - The Delhi High Court has rejected the plea of Uphaar Cinema owners and real estate tycoons the Ansal brothers for handing over to them the cinema hall, which was sealed after a fire tragedy that killed 59 people in 1997. In their plea, the Ansals stated that they wanted the cinema hall for its productive use. German court rejects Demjanjuk appeal over deportationMay 11th, 2009 Berlin court rejects Demjanjuk appealBERLIN — A Berlin court has rejected an appeal by suspected Nazi death camp guard John Demjanjuk aimed at preventing his deportation to Germany. An administrative court says Monday that it rejected Demjanjuk's argument that Germany should be compelled to withdraw its agreement to take him in. Zardari urges Chinese entrepreneurs to invest in PakistanAugust 23rd, 2009 HANGZHOU - Visiting Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari has urged Chinese entrepreneurs to set up business ventures in that country in a bid to boost foreign investment. Zardari made the call during his visit to Hangzhou, capital of China's Zhejiang Province, Saturday. Malaysian court rejects HINDRAF leader's plea to drop sedition chargeMay 1st, 2009 KUALA LUMPUR - A Malaysian Sessions Court has dismissed Hindu Rights Action Force (HINDRAF) legal adviser P. Uthayakumar's application to drop the sedition charge against him. Head examiner suspended in Pak after bread found wrapped in exam answer sheetsJuly 5th, 2009 ISLAMABAD - Following the bizarre incident of intermediate examination answer sheets being used as bread wrappers coming to light, the Balochistan Education Department has suspended the head examiner and examiner. The Balochistan Intermediate and Secondary Education (BISE) chairman, Dr Ghulam Hussain said that both the officials have also been served show-cause notices for the scandal. Pak student reveals his "mental torture" during detention in BritainJune 11th, 2009 ISLAMABAD - Tariqur Rehman, one of the 10 Pakistan students arrested by British officials in a country wide terror crackdown has returned to Pakistan. Talking to media persons upon his arrival in Islamabad, Rehman charged the British officials with treating the students as hardcore criminals during detention. Chinese student gets life sentence for killing teacherJanuary 13th, 2009 TAIYUAN - A 17-year-old student was sentenced to life in prison for fatally stabbing a teacher last year in north China's Shanxi Province, a court announced Wednesday. The student, identified only by his surname of Li, was dissatisfied with the work of head teacher Hao Xudong, according to evidence heard by the Intermediate People's Court of Shuozhou City during the initial trial. Two wrongly jailed Chinese get justice after 13 yearsJanuary 10th, 2009 ZHENGZHOU - Two men who were wrongly jailed on alleged robbery charges have finally found justice when a central China court corrected its 13-year-old mistake and declared they were innocent. A village post office in Biyang County of the central Henan Province was robbed of 8,200 yuan ($1,170) on the night of Nov 21, 1995. Under Right to Information Act, Scarlett's mother questions murder probeMarch 13th, 2009 PANAJI - Fiona Mackeown, the mother of slain British teenager Scarlett Keeling, has filed a Right to Information (RTI) application seeking details of the Goa police's investigation into her daughter's mysterious death February last year. The application was received by the police early this week.
|
|
