Questions, answers on requiring health insurance
BOSTON — Should the federal government require virtually all Americans to be insured or face thousands of dollars in fines? Proponents say this requirement is crucial to extending coverage and reining in costs as Massachusetts has done. Critics say it would impose an unfair burden on individuals and families already struggling in harsh economic times.
A look at the issue in question-and-answer form:
Q: What’s being proposed?
A: Democratic Sen. Max Baucus of Montana, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, is proposing that, as part of any overhaul, insurance be mandatory for all Americans, much the way car owners are required to have auto coverage. People making up to three times the federal poverty level — about $66,000 for a family of four and $32,000 for an individual — would be eligible for tax credits to help cover the cost of premiums. Those who fail to get insurance would face stiff fines, from $750 a year for an individual to $1,500 for families. The maximum penalty on individuals would be $950, while families could face maximum fines of $3,800.
Q: What is the proposal based on?
A: The plan is based in part on an element of Massachusetts’ sweeping health care law, known as an “individual mandate.” When Massachusetts passed the 2006 law, it became the first state to require that virtually all residents have health insurance or face a series of steadily increasing fines. To help soften the penalty, Massachusetts first created state subsidized insurance plans for those earning up three times the federal poverty level, with the poorest residents getting essentially free care and those earning more paying increasingly higher premiums and copays. The state also created a Health Care Connector — similar to the “health care exchange” being proposed on a federal level — to help those ineligible for subsidized care connect with lower-cost private health plans. Finally, Massachusetts decided to exempt from fines for anyone who doesn’t qualify for the subsidized plans but still can’t find any affordable private plan based upon state affordability standards.
Q: Who has been fined in Massachusetts?
A: Massachusetts decided to phase in its fines. During 2007, the first full year of the health care law, those who refused to get insurance lost the personal exemption on their state tax returns — equivalent to a $219 fine. In subsequent years, the fines were scheduled to increase dramatically. In 2008, a fine for an individual who could afford insurance but refused was $76 for each uninsured month or $912 for the entire year. For couples, the maximum fine for the entire year would be $1,824. In 2009, the fines increased again, to $89 a month or $1,068 for an entire year for an individual. For couples, the maximum fine was $2,136.
Q: So how many people have actually been fined in Massachusetts?
A: The state has so far only released numbers for the first year. In 2007, nearly 3 percent of state’s taxpayers — about 97,000 filers — were uninsured even though they could have afforded health care and were stripped of the $219 exemption. An additional 2 percent — or about 62,000 filers — were found not to earn enough for health care and weren’t fined. The state allows taxpayers to appeal the fines. Numbers for 2008 are expected later this year.
Q: Why have fines at all?
A: There are a few basic arguments for requiring health care for as many people as possible. One argument is that it spreads risk among as wide a group as possible, which helps lower overall costs. Another argument is that insuring the largest number of Americans will take some of the pressure off premiums for those who are already insured. President Barack Obama has said insured Americans pay what amounts to a hidden fee to help pay hospitals for the cost of covering the uninsured. Without fines, advocates say, there would be no way of enforcing the mandate.
Q: What has Obama said about an individual mandate?
A: During the presidential campaign, Obama criticized the idea of fining individuals for not having health insurance. During a Democratic debate in February 2008, Obama warned that fines could lead to a situation like that in Massachusetts, where, he said, some residents were choosing to accept a fine because it was less expensive than health care premiums. “We don’t want to put adults in a situation in which, on the front end, we are mandating them, we are forcing them to purchase insurance, and if the subsidies are inadequate, the burden is on them, and they will be penalized,” he said.
Related News
Health care issues: What about a government-run single payer national health system?October 13th, 2009 Health care issues: A single-payer system?A look at key issues in the health care debate:
THE ISSUE: Should there be a government-run, single-payer national health care system?
THE POLITICS: A government-run health care system is attractive to many Democrats, who want access to health insurance for all, including about 45 million uninsured Americans. One proposal in Congress would establish a program to provide all people in the United States with free health care through a publicly financed but privately delivered system.
Health care issues: Medicare cutsOctober 6th, 2009 Health care issues: Medicare cutsA look at key issues in the health care debate:
THE ISSUE: Will seniors' Medicare benefits be slashed to pay for health care overhaul?
THE POLITICS: Democrats are proposing to reduce the ballooning costs of Medicare to keep the program solvent. They want to root out waste to find the savings, and to reduce payments to some providers.
Venezuela to fine broadcasters of 'Family Guy'; official says show promotes marijuana useSeptember 24th, 2009 Venezuela to fine networks that air 'Family Guy'CARACAS, Venezuela — Venezuelan authorities plan to impose fines on cable television companies that refuse to stop airing the animated television series "Family Guy."
Justice Minister Tareck El Aissami says the program should be pulled from the airwaves because it promotes the use of marijuana. El Aissami was outraged by a recent episode in which the show's characters started a campaign to legalize marijuana.
Gibbs: Public option just 1 way to achieve goal of health insurance for millions without itSeptember 13th, 2009 Gibbs: Public option 1 way to meet coverage goalWASHINGTON — White House spokesman Robert Gibbs says it's not true that a health care overhaul will affect people who already have insurance. He says President Barack Obama is determined that health care legislation provides Americans with a choice of insurers and competition for the companies that now dominate the market.
Obama cites new data in making case for health care overhaul, pushes plan at Minneapolis rallySeptember 12th, 2009 Obama to push health care plan at Minnesota rallyWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama, citing new government data showing that nearly half of all Americans live without health insurance in a 10-year period, says the situation will only worsen without the overhaul legislation he wants Congress to send him. Obama was testing his message — that losing health insurance can happen to anyone — at a rally Saturday in Minneapolis.
Obama includes required coverage for all as part of health care overhaul proposalSeptember 9th, 2009 Individuals would have to carry health insuranceWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama says individuals would be required to carry basic health insurance under his overhaul plan and businesses would have to offer workers health care or pay for part of insurance cost for their workers. Obama said those who could not afford coverage would have a hardship waiver, and 95 percent of all small businesses would be exempt because of their size and narrow profit margin.
Facing questions on cost, Obama defends push for health care overhaulAugust 14th, 2009 Obama defends health care plan amid cost questionsBELGRADE, Mont. — At a town hall style meeting, a Montana man bluntly challenged President Barack Obama's contention that he can overhaul health care without raising Americans' taxes to pay for it.
In pitch for health care overhaul, Obama says insurance companies holding Americans hostageAugust 14th, 2009 Obama assails health insurance companiesBELGRADE, Mont. — President Barack Obama says Americans are being held hostage by health insurance companies that deny coverage based on pre-existing conditions or cancel coverage when people get sick.
Senators say finding middle ground on a public insurance plan is a key to health care overhaulJuly 5th, 2009 Senators say compromise key to health care billWASHINGTON — It will take a compromise on a government option for insurance if the Senate is to agree on a health care overall before next month's break, two senators said Sunday. President Barack Obama is pushing for an Aug.
Under a Senate health care plan, you pay your own medical insurance premium or pay a fineJuly 3rd, 2009 Under Senate health care plan, either way you payWASHINGTON — First you paid to insure your car. Soon you may have to add health insurance premiums to that stack of monthly bills as well.
Health overhaul in Senate bill imposes penalty on those refusing affordable medical coverageJuly 2nd, 2009 Senate bill fines people refusing health coverageWASHINGTON — Americans who refuse to buy affordable medical coverage could be hit with fines of more than $1,000 under a health care overhaul bill unveiled Thursday by key Senate Democrats looking to fulfill President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. The Congressional Budget Office estimated the fines will raise around $36 billion over 10 years.
Health overhaul would impose stiff penalty on those who refuse to get medical coverageJuly 2nd, 2009 Uninsured face stiff penalty in Senate health billWASHINGTON — Americans who refuse to buy affordable medical coverage could be hit with fines of more than $1,000 under a health care overhaul bill unveiled Thursday by key Senate Democrats looking to fulfill President Barack Obama's top domestic priority. The Congressional Budget Office estimated the fines will raise around $36 billion over 10 years.
A measure of private health insurance coverage of Americans shows a 50-year-low, CDC saysJuly 1st, 2009 CDC: Private health care coverage at 50-year-lowATLANTA — The percentage of Americans with private health insurance has hit its lowest mark in 50 years, according to two new government reports. About 65 percent of non-elderly Americans had private insurance in 2008, down from 67 percent the year before, according to preliminary data released Wednesday by the U.S.
Dodd says taxing benefits to pay for health care overhaul is a bad idea and unnecessaryJune 14th, 2009 Senator says tax on health benefits is unnecessaryWASHINGTON — A leading Democratic senator says the idea of taxing health benefits is a bad one and unnecessary. Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut says that people are struggling economically at the moment and don't need a new tax on the health care benefits they receive.
Obama health fine after trip to Mexico, which is struggling with swine flu outbreakApril 25th, 2009 Obama health fine after trip to MexicoWASHINGTON — The White House says President Barack Obama's health is fine a little more than a week after he traveled to Mexico, where an outbreak of swine flu has killed at least 68 people and sickened more than 1,000. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Saturday that "the Presidents trip to Mexico has not put his health in any danger."
The top international health official says the new swine flu strain that has hit Mexico has "pandemic potential." Obama was in Mexico last week to meet with top government officials and talk about the growing problem with drug smuggling and border violence.
Loading ...
September 9th, 2009 at 9:58 am
It really is an amazing idea. Crazy amazing. I thought about the analogy made to auto insurance someone else made. They made the point about those not needing auto insurance because they don’t have a car. Totally valid. But the argument government will return with is that everyone has life so needs health insurance.
Of course what that implies is that they are now going to regulate life.
And that is a scary proposition and one that flies in the face of the Declaration of Independence but it is in my opinion where we find ourselves today.