Health insurance from Uncle Sam gets a look
WASHINGTON — Look out Aetna, Humana and UnitedHealthcare. Senators are meeting behind closed doors to consider whether the federal government should jump into the health insurance business.
The government already covers medical care for seniors, disabled people, poor families and many children. But coverage in those programs is restricted to people who meet certain qualifications, including age and income.
The issue now is whether middle-class workers and their families should be offered the choice of joining a government-sponsored plan similar to what they get through their employers.
If Congress agrees, a public plan would be part of the health overhaul legislation that lawmakers want to put on President Barack Obama’s desk later this year.
Senators on the Finance Committee on Thursday are weighing several designs for a public plan. They also will be given the option of having no public plan at all.
That last option is the outcome the insurance industry is hoping for.
The companies say a government plan could put them out of business, and they’ve offered to submit to new consumer protections and help find $2 trillion in health care savings over 10 years in the hopes of warding off any government-sponsored plan. Business groups also are leery of the idea. Republicans already are saying a public plan would put bureaucrats, not doctors and patients, in control of life-and-death decisions.
But Democrats think the idea would be a political winner. Since Medicare — a government-run plan — is popular with seniors, they figure a public plan for the middle class would also find acceptance.
Two of the designs that senators will consider call for a plan that’s like Medicare, except it would pay doctors and hospitals a little more generously. In one version, the public plan would be run directly by the government. The alternative would be to have it administered by regional middlemen under contract to the government.
A third idea would leave it up to each state to set up and run their own public insurance plans.
A fourth option, promoted by Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., would try to address concerns about unfair competition from a public plan.
Schumer’s proposal would require the public plan to be financed by premiums, not tax dollars. It would have to follow the same solvency rules as private insurers, maintaining a reserve fund to cover liabilities. Doctors and hospitals would be free to participate in the plan, or opt out. And the public plan would have to operate under the same consumer protection rules as private insurers.
Schumer says he believes the public plan would set a high standard for quality. Since it wouldn’t have to turn a profit, it could invest in prevention and wellness.
His idea is getting a close look also from a group of fiscally conservative Democrats in the House, known as the Blue Dogs.
On the Net:
Senate Finance Committee: www.finance.senate.gov
Related News
Health care issues: The pros, cons and politics of health insurance cooperatives, in briefSeptember 30th, 2009 Health care issues: Insurance cooperativesA look at key issues in the health care debate:
THE ISSUE: Are consumer-run co-ops a realistic alternative to a new government-run insurance option?
THE POLITICS: The Democratic push for a government-run insurance plan to compete in the marketplace is running into brisk resistance in Congress. As a possible compromise, some lawmakers have proposed establishing nonprofit insurance co-ops instead of a public plan.
Proposed tax on high-value insurance plans sparking concerns among Capitol Hill DemocratsSeptember 17th, 2009 Dems attack proposed new tax on insurance plansWASHINGTON — A proposed tax on high-value health insurance policies is sparking widespread opposition from congressional Democrats who fear it would hit middle-class workers like coal miners in West Virginia. The opposition sprang up Thursday, a day after Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus proposed the tax to pay for his health overhaul bill.
Kerry says Kennedy would compromise on health care overhaul, but not yetAugust 30th, 2009 Kerry: Kennedy would compromise if necessaryWASHINGTON — A leading Democratic senator says the late Sen. Edward M. Kennedy would have been ready to compromise on overhauling health care, but negotiations had not yet reached that point.
Kerry says compromise on health care overhaul's public option may be necessary, but not yetAugust 30th, 2009 Kerry: Compromise may be necessary but not yetWASHINGTON — A leading Democratic senator says backers of a public option in President Barack Obama's attempt to overhaul health care may need to compromise on the issue but adds that such a point hasn't been reached yet. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts suggested that compromise on the public option could become necessary if and when Democrats get to the point where they are not going to get there.
Sebelius: Obama OK with insurance co-ops to offer choice, competition to private plansAugust 16th, 2009 Sebelius: Public insurance option not essentialWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's health secretary is suggesting the White House is ready to accept nonprofit insurance cooperatives instead of a government-run public option in a health overhaul plan. A Republican senator says that is worth looking at.
Reid: Democratic senators united on need for health care bill this, aiming for bipartisanshipAugust 4th, 2009 Reid: Democratic senators united on health careWASHINGTON — Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says his party's caucus has "absolute unity" on the need to pass health care reform this year. The Nevadan, joined by other lawmakers, spoke to reporters Tuesday afternoon on a White House driveway after Senate Democrats met over lunch with President Barack Obama.
House Dems seek to speed up health bill ban on denying coverage due to pre-existing conditionsJuly 16th, 2009 Democrats push quicker access to health coverageWASHINGTON — House Democrats want to guarantee people with pre-existing health conditions faster access to insurance coverage. Democrats on the Education and Labor Committee passed the amendment as they got to work Thursday on their portion of a sweeping health overhaul bill.
Senators say finding middle ground on a public insurance plan is a key to health care overhaulJuly 5th, 2009 Senators say compromise key to health care billWASHINGTON — It will take a compromise on a government option for insurance if the Senate is to agree on a health care overall before next month's break, two senators said Sunday. President Barack Obama is pushing for an Aug.
Obama-industry confrontation looms over what role government should play in health careJune 24th, 2009 Lawmaker: White House wants bipartisan health planWASHINGTON — Even as President Barack Obama and the insurance industry move toward open confrontation over the role of government in health care, his administration is telling lawmakers to keep pushing for a bipartisan deal. Obama on Tuesday dismissed as "not logical" the insurance lobby's assertion that a new government health plan he backs would dismantle the employer-sponsored coverage most Americans now have.
GOP senators on key committee underscore opposition to public planJune 8th, 2009 GOP senators respond to Obama on health careWASHINGTON — Republicans on a key Senate committee are warning President Barack Obama that he's making a mistake on health care by supporting a government insurance option for the middle class. In a letter to Obama released Monday, all but one of the Republican senators on the Finance Committee reaffirmed their opposition to a public plan, suggesting that differences on the issue could doom chances for a bipartisan bill.
GOP senators on key committee underscore their opposition to public planJune 8th, 2009 GOP senators warn Obama on health careWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is making a mistake on health care by insisting on a government insurance option for the middle class, influential Republicans said in a letter to the White House released Monday. It could cost him chances for broad support across the political divide, the nine lawmakers, all members of the Senate Finance Committee, warned.
House Democrats weigh subsidies for families earning up to $88k and insurance mandatesMay 14th, 2009 House Democrats weigh major health care changesWASHINGTON — House Democrats are looking at big health care changes, including federal aid to help families earning up to $88,000 pay for insurance and a requirement that all must carry coverage. A document obtained by The Associated Press shows the plan being written by the House Energy and Commerce Committee would also require employers to offer coverage to their full-time workers, or pay a percentage of their payroll to the government.
Senators weigh 3 different designs for a new government health insurance plan, officials sayMay 9th, 2009 Sources: Senators weigh 3 government health plansWASHINGTON — Senators are considering three different designs for a new government health insurance plan that middle-income Americans could buy into for the first time, congressional officials said Friday. Officials familiar with the proposals said senators plan to debate them in a closed meeting next week.
AP sources: Senators to weigh 3 options for gov't health plan for middle-income AmericansMay 9th, 2009 AP sources: 3 options mulled for gov't health planWASHINGTON — Senators are considering three different designs for a new government health insurance plan that middle-income Americans could buy into for the first time, congressional officials said Friday. Officials familiar with the proposals said senators plan to debate them in a closed meeting next week.
Health insurers offer to stop charging more to women if all Americans required to get careMay 5th, 2009 Health insurers try to head off public planWASHINGTON — The health insurance industry offered Tuesday to end its practice of charging higher premiums to women. It was the latest concession from health insurers as Congress works to overhaul the nation's $2.5 trillion health care system.
Loading ...