Frustration over Obama’s Afghanistan war policy
WASHINGTON — Military officials voiced frustration and congressional leaders urged caution Tuesday over what they described as President Barack Obama’s shifting strategy in Afghanistan, six months after he committed thousands more U.S. troops to the stalemated war there.
Administration officials maintained they were looking at all options to protect the U.S. and its allies by shutting down al-Qaida leaders who are believed to be hiding in areas of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan.
Critics at the Pentagon and on Capitol Hill said the White House was in danger of taking its eye off the fight that has turned increasingly deadly for American forces in recent months. They called on Obama to fulfill an anticipated request for more troops from the top U.S. commander in Afghanistan, Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal.
“This leads me to urge you to waste no time in providing a clear direction to our commanders and civilian leaders, along with the resources necessary to achieve their mission,” House Armed Services Chairman Ike Skelton, D-Mo., wrote to Obama in a letter dated Tuesday, a copy of which was obtained by The Associated Press. Skelton is the highest-ranking Democrat so far to support sending more troops to Afghanistan.
Warning of what he called the lessons of history, Skelton added: “The last administration allowed itself to be distracted from the fight forced on us in Afghanistan by the fight it chose in Iraq. I believe that this was a strategic mistake, robbing the war in Afghanistan of the necessary resources and resulting in an approach of ‘half-ass it and hope.’ We cannot afford to continue that policy.”
He was referring to then-President George W. Bush’s decision to invade Iraq in 2003 after largely abandoning the hunt for Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaida leaders in Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Military officials who thought the debate over strategy and troop levels had been settled when Obama outlined his mission for the region in March expressed concern Tuesday that seesawing politics could stall decisions and leave commanders in Afghanistan with no clear policy or strategy to follow. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss the debate publicly.
Arizona Sen. John McCain, who has urged Obama to send more troops to Afghanistan, said Tuesday, “I’ve never seen a disconnect like this between the military leadership and the White House on an issue.” McCain, who was Obama’s opponent in the 2008 presidential election, spoke at a conference hosted by the Washington-based organization, Foreign Policy Initiative.
At the White House, top Obama advisers insist the administration remains committed to its long-stated goal for the war in Afghanistan — disrupting al-Qaida and denying the terrorist organization safe haven on either side of the nation’s porous border with Pakistan.
But they remain unconvinced that sending many more U.S. troops to Afghanistan is the way to do it.
“We have an open mind to any argument that is made,” Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton said in an interview late Monday on PBS’ “The NewsHour With Jim Lehrer.”
She added: “Our goal is to protect the United States of America, our allies, our friends around the world from what is the epicenter of terrorism — namely, the Afghanistan-Pakistan border.”
In recent days, the Obama administration has signaled it is narrowing its focus to Pakistan, since military and White House officials alike agree that very few al-Qaida extremists are believed to still be in Afghanistan.
Benchmarks outlined last week for measuring success in the war against insurgents describe the top American goal for the region as disrupting terrorist networks in Afghanistan “and especially Pakistan.” White House aides are considering launching more missile strikes against al-Qaida targets inside Pakistan from unmanned spy planes.
And in a rash of television interviews that aired Sunday, Obama himself did not focus on saving Afghanistan. In at least four of the interviews, he did not even mention the Taliban, which is allied with al-Qaida and is seeking to reinstate its rule over Afghanistan after being deposed in a U.S.-led invasion following the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Obama also said it’s premature to decide whether to send more U.S. troops to Afghanistan to join the 68,000 who will be there by the end of the year. Fifty-one American troops died there in August, making it the bloodiest month for the U.S. since the war began in October 2001.
One senior military official said stepping up airstrikes might be difficult and more risky to do without additional forces. Without more troops, coalition forces will be able to secure fewer regions, and the insurgents will only have to move to the areas troops vacate.
The confusion led Republicans and some Democrats to renew demands for McChrystal to testify in front of Congress to personally outline the situation in Afghanistan and his request for more troops and how best to go after al-Qaida.
“It now appears President Obama has buyer’s remorse,” said Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo. “Congress needs to hear directly from Gen. McChrystal to ensure political motivations here in Washington don’t override the needs of our commanders on the ground.”
Countering, Senate Armed Services Chairman Carl Levin, D-Mich., said it would be premature for McChrystal to testify until the troop request is delivered to Washington.
Associated Press writers Pauline Jelinek and Lolita C. Baldor contributed to this report.
Related News
Obama to travel to Counterterrorism Center, meet with lawmakers on Afghanistan and PakistanOctober 6th, 2009 President meets with lawmakers on Afghan policyWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama keeps his attention on global terror and security matters on Tuesday, as he continues a series of meetings with advisers and others on Afghanistan. In the morning, he'll visit the National Counterterrorism Center in Washington and meet with top officials there.
Despite debate, Pentagon chief vows no second-guessing of Obama's decision on AfghanistanOctober 5th, 2009 Gates: Military will fall in line on AfghanistanWASHINGTON — Defense Secretary Robert Gates says the U.S. military will not hesitate in carrying out whatever mission President Barack Obama decides on in Afghanistan.
Obama inviting bipartisan group of lawmakers to White House to confer on AfghanistanOctober 5th, 2009 Obama to meet with lawmakers on AfghanistanWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama has invited a bipartisan group of congressional leaders to the White House on Tuesday to confer about the eroding war in Afghanistan. The meeting comes at a pivotal time as the war is about to roll into its ninth year.
Amb. Rice: US must weigh political, economic and military conditions on ground in AfghanistanSeptember 23rd, 2009 US Amb. Rice says Afghanistan situation is complexNEW YORK — U.S. Ambassador Susan Rice says the Obama administration's fresh assessment of American policy in Afghanistan is appropriate and necessary in light of an evolving and uncertain political landscape there.
To tighten policy, military requiring earlier notification about detainees to Red CrossAugust 23rd, 2009 Military: Red Cross should get early detainee infoWASHINGTON — The U.S. military has quietly tightened its detention policy to require that the International Committee of the Red Cross be notified promptly of terror suspects held at a special camp in Iraq and another in Afghanistan, a senior military officer said Saturday.
Defense Secretary Gates says US will be in Afghanistan for 'a few years'August 14th, 2009 WASHINGTON - U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said there is a possibility of an increased American military presence in Afghanistan, but warned that such a move would stretch military resources and could lead to a possible Afghan backlash.
Obama says US has no intention of permanent Afghanistan basesJune 4th, 2009 Obama: no permanent US presence in AfghanistanCAIRO — President Barack Obama says the United States has no intention of keeping its troops in Afghanistan and America seeks no permanent military bases there. Obama calls it costly and politically difficult to continue the conflict.
White House says the only path for gays to serve openly in military is through legislationMay 13th, 2009 White House: Legislation key for gays in militaryWASHINGTON — The White House says it won't stop gays and lesbians from being dismissed from the military while the Obama administration works to repeal a decade-old policy banning openly gay people from serving in uniform. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Tuesday that President Barack Obama does not plan to intervene in current cases against men and women who announce their homosexuality.
White House says the only path for gays to serve openly in military is through legislationMay 12th, 2009 White House: Law only answer for gays in militaryWASHINGTON — The White House says it won't stop gays and lesbians from being dismissed from the military while the Obama administration works to repeal a decade-old policy banning openly gay people from serving in uniform. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Tuesday that President Barack Obama does not plan to intervene in current cases against men and women who announce their homosexuality.
White House says 'don't ask' policy on gays in military is in early stages of reviewMay 10th, 2009 Obama aide: Gays in military policy under reviewWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's national security adviser says allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the military is in the early discussions. But retired Marine Gen.
Obama seeks $83.4 bn for Iraq, Afghanistan missionsApril 10th, 2009 WASHINGTON - US President Barack Obama Thursday asked Congress to authorise $83.4 billion in additional funding for the military missions in Iraq and Afghanistan. In a letter to Nancy Pelosi, speaker of the House of Representatives, he said that nearly 95 percent of the military request for the current fiscal year, which ends Sep 30, would go toward military operations in either Iraq or the conflict in Afghanistan, which has increasingly spilled into neighbouring Pakistan.
Gates announces major shift in US defence prioritiesApril 7th, 2009 WASHINGTON - US Defence Secretary Robert Gates Monday announced a major shift in the Pentagon's spending priorities, cutting some expensive Cold War-era weapons programmes and boosting spending that would aid the country's battle against terrorism. Gates said the decisions drew heavily on lessons learned from the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and represented a shift away from conventional warfare, as well as futuristic military projects where the technology was not yet proven.
Revamped Afghan policy indicates US' increased concern for the region: Lisa CurtisMarch 28th, 2009 WASHINGTON - The new US policy for Afghanistan and Pakistan clearly indicates that Washington is more concerned than before about the impending crisis in the region, and wants to root out insurgency from its core by adopting a more 'regional approach'. According to Senior Research Fellow for South Asia at the Heritage Foundation's Asian Studies Center, Lisa Curtis, President Barack Obama has sent a strong signal that U.S.
US adding troops to fight Taliban in Pakistan safe-havenFebruary 17th, 2009 WASHINGTON - President Barack Obama has approved adding some 17,000 US troops to its forces in Afghanistan to fight a resurgent Taliban saying 'the situation in Afghanistan and Pakistan demands urgent attention and swift action.'
'The Taliban is resurgent in Afghanistan, and Al Qaeda supports the insurgency and threatens America from its safe-haven along the Pakistani border,' Obama said in a statement released by the White House Tuesday. The troops increase 'is necessary to stabilise a deteriorating situation in Afghanistan, which has not received the strategic attention, direction, and resources it urgently requires,' he said.
Obama mulls decision on more troops to Afghanistan: OfficialFebruary 16th, 2009 WASHINGTON - US President Barack Obama will soon announce his decision on the deployment of more troops in Afghanistan, the White House has said. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs, who travelled with the president from Chicago to Washington, told reporters Monday that the government was reviewing the US policy towards Afghanistan and may take a decision soon to send additional troops to the war-torn country.
Loading ...