Meltdown 101: How will executive pay curbs work?
WASHINGTON — Seven companies on government life support — bailout recipients like General Motors and Citigroup — face a deadline Thursday to propose compensation packages for their highest-paid employees, which will have to get the thumbs-up from the Obama administration’s “pay czar.”
It’s the first time a federal official will have veto power over the how much private-sector executives are compensated. Some fear this new power encroaches on the free market, but Congress decided the government should have a say when it comes to the companies relying most heavily on taxpayer money.
How will the pay restrictions work? Here are some questions and answers.
Q: Who’s running the show?
A: The administration’s pay czar — technically called the Special Master for TARP Executive Compensation — is Kenneth Feinberg, 64, a high-profile lawyer and mediator. Feinberg is best known for running the government’s fund for families of 9/11 victims.
Q: How did that go?
A: That job got off to a bumpy start. Initially, some 9/11 victims’ relatives accused Feinberg of being arrogant and distant.
As the program continued, Feinberg won over many of his critics and garnered praise as a pragmatic mediator. He personally heard appeals from families who felt the original payment offered was too small. He earned the respect of some families simply by sitting in a room and listening for hours as they described their lost loved ones.
Q: What has Feinberg done so far?
A: Feinberg has been consulting with the seven companies that have received “exceptional assistance” from the government. They are: American International Group Inc., Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., General Motors, GMAC, Chrysler and Chrysler Financial.
Q: So what happens Thursday?
A: Thursday is the last day the companies can submit proposed pay packages for the 25 highest earners at each one. At least one company, General Motors, said Tuesday it already had submitted its plan.
Q: What’s next?
A: Feinberg has 60 days to review the proposals, then accept or reject them. He is expected to meet and negotiate with the companies during this period. He also will approve broader compensation formulas that will apply to the 75 next-highest-paid workers at each company.
Q: Why can’t he just set a very low cap on all the executives’ salaries, to protect taxpayer money?
A: The companies argue that if they can’t pay competitive wages to their best employees, they will lose them to other employers.
A bank’s best-paid employees are compensated based on the revenue they produce, and many make millions for their companies. If banks lose their best people, that could put a major dent in their profits, making it harder for them to recover and repay the government’s money.
Q: Why are they so worried about losing employees to competitors? Aren’t there thousands of bankers out there already looking for work?
A: It’s true that the financial services industry has seen massive layoffs. But an employee valuable enough to rank in the top 25 probably makes a lot of money for the company. That’s an employee any bank would be happy to have — including healthier competitors and foreign banks not subject to the government rules.
Q: Then why not just let the companies set their own compensation packages?
A: Outsize bonuses at AIG and other firms with government money have sparked public and congressional outrage. Feinberg has to walk a careful line — being tough enough to satisfy Congress and the public but not so tough that he undermines the companies’ competitiveness.
House Financial Services Committee chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., said “the public has a right to be angry” about the huge pay packages at companies that depend on taxpayer dollars, and that it is a “legitimate part of the function of government to respond to that anger.”
Q: So what is Congress’s role?
A: Feinberg’s was appointed to carry out rules Congress passed as part of the $787 billion stimulus package. The House passed legislation last month that would apply the same pay standards to all financial businesses, which Frank said would address the concern about burdening only the most troubled companies.
Q: Are there any limits to Feinberg’s power over the pay packages?
A: He can’t tear up pay contracts or retroactively claw back compensation already paid out. But he has a very strong voice in how much elite employees will make in 2009.
Q: What sorts of things might he insist on?
A: Compensation experts expect Feinberg to push for changes that would align pay packages with executives’ performance. These could include disbursing their pay over years so that the long-term results of their decisions become clear, allowing banks to revoke some of that pay if the bankers’ bets go bad, or having them pay more compensation in restricted stock — which can rise and fall in value based on a company’s performance — and less in cash.
Q: How much will Feinberg make to tell others how much they can earn?
A: As with his work on the 9/11 fund, Feinberg is serving as pay czar pro bono.
Associated Press Writers Stevenson Jacobs and Devlin Barrett contributed to this report.
Related News
Obama administration pay czar says negotiations with 7 companies have been largely consensualSeptember 30th, 2009 Pay czar: Talks with 7 companies are consensualCHICAGO — The Obama administration's pay czar said Wednesday his negotiations over executive compensation with the seven companies that received the biggest helpings from the federal bailout pot have been "a consensual process" and not a matter of forcing decisions on them. "I'm hoping I won't be required to simply make a determination over company objections," veteran Washington attorney Kenneth Feinberg told the Chicago Bar Association in a speech delivered over a television link.
MELTDOWN FLASHBACK: Sunday, Sept. 7, 2008September 6th, 2009 MELTDOWN FLASHBACK: Sunday, Sept. 7, 2008The U.S.
Bailed-out banks tried to follow pay rules but got little guidance from Treasury, audit findsAugust 19th, 2009 Audit: Little guidance for banks facing pay rulesWASHINGTON — Bailed-out banks were scrambling to comply with executive compensation rules months before the regulations were finalized, according to an inspector general report released Wednesday. Treasury did not issue its most recent set of rules limiting executive compensation until June 15, but companies that took money from the $700 billion financial bailout earlier this year already had hired consultants and started assessing the risks of the rules months earlier.
White House OK with $7 million yearly salary for new CEO of bailed-out insurer AIGAugust 18th, 2009 White House OK with $7 million salary for AIG CEOWASHINGTON — The White House is fine with bailed-out insurer AIG's decision to pay its new CEO $7 million a year. Presidential spokesman Robert Gibbs says that's the price of competent leadership to make the company profitable again.
Madhya Pradesh bans use of air conditioners in government officesAugust 13th, 2009 BHOPAL - Hit by a severe power crisis, the Madhya Pradesh government has decided to stop using air conditioners in its offices across the state from Thursday. The decision was taken at a meeting of senior government officials and top executives of power distribution companies Wednesday.
GM provides Obama administration with executive compensation proposalAugust 11th, 2009 GM submits executive compensation planWASHINGTON — General Motors Co. said Tuesday it had submitted its executive compensation proposal to the Obama administration, complying with a requirement for companies bailed out by the federal government.
UK Treasury chief to call on banks to improve lending to small businesses to boost economyJuly 27th, 2009 UK calls on banks to improve lendingLONDON — Britain's Treasury chief Alistair Darling will call on banks to reduce the costs of loans to small businesses as he attempts to halt the country's slide further into recession when he meets with banking executives later Monday. Darling is expected to tell executives from banks including Barclays PLC and the bailed out Royal Bank of Scotland PLC that they must do more to improve lending in return for massive taxpayer support.
Correction: Meltdown-Selling MakeupJune 19th, 2009 Correction: Meltdown-Selling MakeupNASHVILLE, Tenn. — In a June 12 story about professionals who have taken a second job in direct sales amid the recession, The Associated Press reported erroneously how companies compensate for recruiting others to sales jobs.
Citigroup seeks Treasury approval to pay out special bonuses, lift pay restrictions, says WSJApril 29th, 2009 WSJ: Citi asks Treasury if it can pay bonusesNEW YORK — Citigroup Inc., which has received $45 billion in federal bailout funds and potentially could have to raise more capital based on "stress test" results, is requesting permission from the Treasury Department to pay out special bonuses to certain workers, The Wall Street Journal said late Tuesday. Banks that have accepted federal bailout funds are subject to greater government scrutiny and limits on how much they pay their top executives.
Survey: companies freezing salaries, limiting bonuses say cost cuts may stay as recession ebbsApril 21st, 2009 Survey: cost cuts to remain after recession easesNEW YORK — Salary freezes, bonus reductions and unpaid furloughs have surged in recent months as companies try to survive without layoffs, and a new survey found many businesses intend to keep the cost-cutting measures after the recession eases. Nearly 60 percent of the companies say they are freezing salaries, while another 41 percent have or will tighten bonus criteria for executives.
Gordon Brown wants results from G20 summitMarch 26th, 2009 LONDON - Lashing out at the corporate greed, the British Prime Minister Gordon Brown has said that he would work to set global principles and standards for salaries in the finance sector at next week's G20 summit in London. On Wednesday, Brown promised "detailed results" from the summit as he stopped in New York during a three-continent tour intended to drum up support for a coordinated international response to the global economic crisis.
Obama caps executive salaries of firms seeking federal aidFebruary 4th, 2009 WASHINGTON - US President Barack Obama Wednesday announced tough restrictions on the salaries of Wall Street executives seeking government aid and slammed financial firms for shirking their responsibilities as the country suffers a severe recession. The new rule will limit executives from companies getting 'exceptional assistance' from the government to a salary of $500,000 per year.
Obama limits bailed-out bank CEOs payFebruary 4th, 2009 WASHINGTON - With the government expected to give ailing US financial institutions billions more in aid, President Barack Obama has moved to rein in firms with new restrictions including $500,000 a year cap on the pay of top executives. 'We're going to be demanding some restraint in exchange for federal aid - so that when firms seek new federal dollars, we won't find them up to the same old tricks,' Obama said while announcing the new limits at the White House Wednesday.
Kerala IT industry seeks sops from governmentFebruary 3rd, 2009 THIRUVANANTHAPURAM - Chief executives of Technopark companies here Wednesday asked the Kerala government to announce a stimulus package for the state's IT industry, which has been hit hard by the economic slowdown. The Group of Technopark Companies (GTECH), a body representing the CEOs of the companies in Technopark, expected hope that the government would come up with some sops for the industry in the next state budget, to be presented later this month.
Obama getting tough on 'Wall Street idiots'January 30th, 2009 WASHINGTON - A day after President Barack Obama bashed bailed-out banks for giving huge bonuses, the White House pledged action against such 'irresponsible' behaviour and a Democratic senator proposed capping executive salaries at companies accepting government funds. 'We must have our financial institutions survive but not with a culture that thinks it's all right to kick the taxpayer in the shins,' Senator Claire McCaskill said proposing a law that would prevent executives from making more than the $400,000 salary of the US president.
Loading ...
August 14th, 2009 at 7:59 pm
I think putting a cap on bonuses on companies who have received taxpayer monies is just part of the problem. Any company or individual who is paid by the taxpayers should be held accountable for any questionable expenditures.
What amazes me is the expense of Obummer’s czar’s and their staff. Last I heard he is up to 40. How can the taxpayers and administration not understand how many more millions this adds to the “cost” of government. I think we should demand an accounting of the cost of these czars, who are not accountable to Congress or the American people.
Obeyme just keeps spending our money like it is water.