McCain tries to kill additional C-17 cargo jets
WASHINGTON — While ceding some ground to President Obama on high-profile weapons cuts, lawmakers are cutting money for training and spare parts to pay for other weapons Obama doesn’t want and their own pet projects.
The push-and-pull is playing out within a massive, $626 billion funding bill for the Pentagon that is being debated on the Senate floor. All told, the bill denies Obama about $4 billion he sought for operations and maintenance accounts while providing $2.5 billion for C-17 cargo jets and $2.7 billion worth of pet projects sought by lawmakers.
On Tuesday, Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., launched a withering but probably futile assault on the decision by the Senate Appropriations Committee, led by Sen. Daniel Inouye, D-Hawaii, to add 10 unrequested C-17s to the U.S. fleet of the planes, raising its size to 223. McCain and the Pentagon say the Air Force already has plenty.
A vote on a bid by McCain to kill the additional C-17s is likely on Wednesday.
Critics say curbs to operations and maintenance accounts mean less money is available for fuel, spare parts, training and military exercises or to repair and replace equipment damaged in arduous conditions overseas. Cuts affect the readiness of U.S. troops.
“The (operations and maintenance) account is the operational lifeblood of our military forces,” said Winslow Wheeler of the Center for Defense Information think tank. “Without it, the planes don’t fly, the troops don’t train, and the forces can’t fight.”
McCain has offered an amendment to the measure to cut out the 10 C-17s, but he faces uphill odds in a chamber filled with senators eager to preserve jobs in their states.
“What we would do in this bill is effectively fund the purchase of new aircraft that we neither need nor can afford with critical sustainment money,” he said. “That would have a significant impact on our ability to provide the day-to-day operational funding that our servicemen and women and their families deserve.”
Supporters of the C-17, which is assembled in Long Beach, Calif., though its parts are made across the country, have an overwhelming edge and are virtually certain to defeat McCain’s amendment to cut the planes from the bill. And they say that unlike the much-criticized F-22 fighter, the C-17 is being used in ongoing military operations.
“The C-17 is a proven, combat-tested airlift capability that is essential to the fight we are in right now and has been a workhorse in Iraq and Afghanistan,” said Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo. “With the war in Afghanistan heating up and the war in Iraq continuing, our airlift needs are only growing.”
Bond is also a key supporter of using $512 million in war funds to purchase nine unrequested F-18/A Navy fighters at the same time $655 million is being cut from an operations and maintenance accounts for request for operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. They would be assembled in St. Louis.
Obama is on course to prevail in a battle to cease production of the ultramodern F-22 fighter jet and the VH-71 presidential helicopter, both of which are way over budget. But it took explicit veto threats to keep those out of the Senate measure.
Obama wasn’t willing to threaten a veto over the C-17, however, which lawmakers appear to have read as a green light to provide for the planes.
Obama and McCain, rivals in last year’s race for the White House, are both critics of pet projects, or earmarks. McCain, however, is a far more strident critic of the Senate’s pork-barrel ways. On Tuesday, McCain said Obama has not be stern enough in his dealings with Congress on earmarks. An early White House request to strip earmarks from an omnibus spending bill for the current year was firmly rebuffed by Democratic leaders.
“One thing I know about egregious practices, if you don’t stop them early in an administration, you never will,” McCain said.
At a Veterans of Foreign Wars meeting in Phoenix in August, Obama promised to fight “the special interests and their exotic projects that are years behind schedule and billions over budget,” such as the F-22 fighter, an alternative engine for the F-35 joint strike fighter, and the presidential helicopter.
“If Congress sends me a defense bill loaded with this kind of waste, I will veto it,” Obama promised.
But Obama has had far less luck in his promise to get Congress to cut the number of home-state pet projects in appropriations bills like the defense measure. The pending legislation discloses 778 earmarks totaling $2.7 billion.
However, the C-17 money doesn’t count as an earmark, nor does money for the F-18/A fighter or a new $1.7 billion DDG-51 destroyer to be built in Pascagoula, Miss., home to Republican Sen. Thad Cochran, a top member of the Appropriations Committee and its defense subcommittee.
Related News
Senate passes Pentagon budget, war funding bill as tally for Afghanistan and Iraq hits $1TOctober 6th, 2009 Senate passes Pentagon budget, war fundingWASHINGTON — As President Barack Obama weighs major shifts in strategy in the deteriorating mission in Afghanistan, the Senate on Tuesday passed a bill bringing the total U.S. tab for that war to about $300 billion.
Senate rebuffs Obama, McCain in bipartisan embrace of additional C-17 cargo jetsSeptember 30th, 2009 Senate rebuffs Obama, McCain in backing cargo jetsWASHINGTON — In a rebuff to both President Barack Obama and his former presidential opponent, Republican Sen. John McCain, the Senate on Wednesday rejected an effort to kill $2.5 billion for 10 new C-17 cargo jets and devote the money to military readiness accounts.
McCain: Obama should not delay sending more US troops to AfghanistanSeptember 23rd, 2009 McCain: More troops needed in AfghanistanWASHINGTON — Sen. John McCain says more U.S.
McCain: Raising taxes not needed to reduce ballooning deficit; gov't can cut spending insteadAugust 23rd, 2009 McCain refuses to consider taxes to reduce deficitWASHINGTON — Sen. John McCain is refusing to consider raising taxes to reduce the ballooning deficit.
US lawmakers scrap plans to buy fancy jetsAugust 11th, 2009 WASHINGTON - House Democratic leaders have said they will not force the Pentagon to buy four new passenger jets for ferrying senior government officials after the reported 330 million dollar move invited all round criticism. Two of the four planes were to be C-37s - the military equivalent of the fancy Gulfstream 550.
McCain says additional troops may be needed in Afghanistan, waits for commanders' assessmentAugust 2nd, 2009 McCain says US may need more troops in AfghanistanWASHINGTON — Sen. John McCain says it appears that the U.S.
House rejects most Obama weapons cuts, retreats on F-22 fighterJuly 30th, 2009 House rejects most Obama weapons cutsWASHINGTON — The Democratic-controlled House went along with Defense Secretary Robert Gates' plans to kill the over-budget F-22 fighter jet, but has rejected his efforts to cut off several other big ticket items. Despite objections and veto threats from the White House, a $636 billion Pentagon spending bill passed by a 400-30 vote Thursday contains money for a much-criticized new presidential helicopter fleet, cargo jets that Gates says aren't needed, and an alternative engine for the next-generation F-35 Joint Strike Fighter that the Pentagon says is a waste of money.
House kills funding for the over-budget F-22 fighter, but rejects efferts to cut other weaponsJuly 30th, 2009 House cuts F-22 funding, nixes other weapons cutsWASHINGTON — The Democratic-controlled House went along with Defense Secretary Robert Gates' plans to kill the over-budget F-22 fighter jet, but has rejected his efforts to cut off several other big ticket items. Despite objections and veto threats from the White House, a $636 billion Pentagon spending bill passed by a 400-30 vote Thursday contains money for a much-criticized new presidential helicopter fleet, cargo jets that Gates says aren't needed, and an alternative engine for the next-generation F-35 Joint Strike Fighter that the Pentagon says is a waste of money.
Panel approves $128 billion for Iraq, Afghanistan operations; tally tops $1 trillionJuly 22nd, 2009 Panel approves $128 billion for Iraq, AfghanistanWASHINGTON — The total cost of the U.S. response to the Sept.
Vote postponed on Senate bid to remove $1.75 billion in funding for Lockheed F-22 fighter jetsJuly 16th, 2009 Vote postponed on bid to remove F-22 jet fundingWASHINGTON — A bid to cut $1.75 billion recently added to the defense spending bill for more Lockheed Martin fighter jets has stalled in the Senate despite repeated veto threats by the White House. Bowing to pressure from Majority Leader Harry Reid, Sen.
Key Senate vote postponed to eliminate $1.75 billion in funding for Lockheed F-22 fighter jetsJuly 15th, 2009 Levin says vote postponed on F-22 jet fundingWASHINGTON — A key Senate vote that would eliminate $1.75 billion added to the defense spending bill for more fighter jets from Lockheed Martin has been postponed again. Sen. Carl Levin on Wednesday withdrew the F-22 amendment so the Senate can first address a controversial hate crimes bill.
McCain works to remove $1.75 billion from spending bill for Lockheed Martin F-22 fighter jetsJuly 13th, 2009 McCain looks to cut funding for more F-22 jetsWASHINGTON — Sen. John McCain, in an unusual alliance with the Obama administration, moved Monday to eliminate $1.75 billion recently inserted into the proposed 2010 defense budget for more fighter jets from Lockheed Martin.
McCain says US should board NKorean ship if evidence points to a cargo of elicit materialsJune 21st, 2009 McCain favors boarding NKorean shipWASHINGTON — Sen. John McCain says the U.S.
Boeing to discuss possible order for new aircraft with United AirlinesJune 4th, 2009 Boeing to negotiate with United over new airplanesPITTSBURGH — Airplane maker Boeing Co. said Thursday it will hold discussions with United Airlines over a possible order for new aircraft, after a newspaper reported the carrier had sought bids from Boeing and rival Airbus for up to 150 new jets.
McCain criticises Obama, says sending more troops 'not enough'March 28th, 2009 WASHINGTON - Senator John McCain has denounced President Barack Obama's new plan for sending additional troops to Afghanistan, saying it was "not enough" and suggested the President ought to have been clearer that there will be more troop casualties. The Arizona Republican, who contested against Obama last year, said he was glad the President put the issue "front and center," but is worried that Obama hadn't offered a realistic enough picture of the likely increase in casualties that can be expected with the surge of troops.
Loading ...