SYDNEY - Australian scientists have developed new theory about the ‘Hobbit’ species in the Indonesian island of Flores, that they existed alongside humans.
Archaeologists found the ‘hobbit’ in 2003, while excavating in a cave on the Indonesian island of Flores.
They reported the discovery of a new species of human, one that lived as recently as 12,000 years ago, at the same time as modern humans.
But others disagreed, arguing the one-metre-high skeleton was a modern human that suffered from a deformity known as microcephaly.
The debate has raged ever since.
But, according to a report by ABC News, Debbie Argue, a PhD student from the ANU’s Department of Archaeology and Anthropology, believes she has settled the question by comparing bone fragments from the hobbits to other hominids.
“We compared them to almost every species in our genus, as well as Australopithecine, which was a genus before Homo evolved,” argue said. “Of course, we included Homo sapiens,” she added.
“We discovered that Homo floresiensis ranged off the family tree almost at the beginning of the evolution of our genus, Homo. So, that would have been over two million years ago, and as such a very, very primitive being,” she explained.
Argue describes the work as a paradigm shift in archaeology, overturning the notion that Homo sapiens were the only hominids on the planet after the extinction of Homo erectus and the Neanderthals.
“This is science, so maybe (it’s) not the definitive proof but a very, very solid hypothesis,” she said.
“This is the first time such a huge and comprehensive set of characteristics about the whole of the body of Homo floresiensis has been but into one analysis,” she added.
Argue said that her work challenges another major cornerstone in the theory of human evolution.
“This means that something very, very primitive came out of Africa,” she said. “Previous to this, we thought that what came out of Africa had modern body proportions and an expanded brain case, but this is a much more primitive being,” she added.
“We know that Homo floresiensis was, in Flores at least, from 100,000 years ago to about 12,000 years ago. And at that time, or at least from 40,000 years ago, we had modern humans in Asia and New Guinea and Australia,” she said.
“So, here we were sharing the planet where we thought we’d been the only people that survived after the end of the Neanderthals,” she added. (ANI)
Related News
Links between modern humans, Neanderthals probedSeptember 20th, 2009 WASHINGTON - A team of researchers is probing the links between modern humans and Neanderthals. Homo neanderthalensis nearly made it through two Ice Ages in Europe, and disappeared roughly 30,000 years ago.
Robot that mimics humans from the inside outSeptember 17th, 2009 LONDON - Boffins have developed an amazing skeleton robot that moves just like humans. The creation is known as an "anthropomimetic robot".
Robot replicas may replace humans within next 10 yearsSeptember 15th, 2009 LONDON - Leaked reports from a top secret agency indicate that government scientists are planning for UK citizens to be replaced entirely by perfect robot replicas within the next 10 years. According to a report in The Sun, the leaked report says that the MIT (Ministry of Information Technology) will soon see the development and sale to the public of mechanical representations of humans, called 'surrogates', which are operated through mind control.
Machines can't recognise images like humans as yetSeptember 10th, 2009 WASHINGTON - Computers might have reached a point where they can replicate many aspects of human behaviour, but still they cannot recognize distorted images like humans do, says a team of Penn State researchers. James Z. Wang, along with Ritendra Datta and Jia Li at Penn State, explored the difference in human and machine recognition of visual concepts under various image distortions.
Like humans, chimps too close a dealAugust 21st, 2009 LONDON - Lower-ranking chimpanzees know how to bargain with their superiors to achieve a fairer split of food, concludes a new study. The study, published in Evolution and Human Behavior, suggests that an aptitude for deal-making may have existed millions of years before phrases like "you've got a deal."
"It looks like you can have a quite successful way of dealing with conflicting interests without any language or any very sophisticated communication," says Alicia Melis, a psychologist at the Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology in Leipzig, Germany, who led the study.
Key feature of immune system survived in humans for 60 million yearsAugust 19th, 2009 WASHINGTON - A new study has concluded that one key part of the immune system survived in the humans and other primates for almost 60 million years. Researchers at the Oregon State University (OSU) and the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in the US carried out the study.
Human species could have killed Neanderthal manJuly 21st, 2009 WASHINGTON - The wound that killed a Neanderthal man between 50,000 and 75,000 years was most likely caused by a thrown spear, the kind modern humans used but Neanderthals did not, according to the latest research. "What we've got is a rib injury, with any number of scenarios that could explain it," said Steven Churchill, professor at Duke University.
Monkeys, humans recognise faces the same wayJuly 13th, 2009 WASHINGTON - Rhesus monkeys and humans recognise faces the same way, according to the latest research. The study provides insight into the evolution of the critical human social skill of facial recognition, which enables us to form relationships and interact appropriately with others.
Illness carried by humans may have killed the Neanderthals 30,000 years agoJuly 8th, 2009 COPENHAGEN - A new theory has suggested that an infectious disease carried by Homo sapiens migrating out of Africa was responsible for the demise of the Neanderthal 30,000 years ago. According to a report in The Copenhagen Post, Professor emeritus Bent Sorensen of the University of Roskilde said that disease carried by Homo sapiens migrating out of Africa was responsible for the gradual extinction of our prehistoric cousins in the same way that European illnesses ravaged Native American populations in the sixteenth century.
Humans first ate fish 40,000 years agoJuly 7th, 2009 WASHINGTON - Freshwater fish remains a staple in many regions of the world, but it remains unclear when it became a year-round diet for early humans. A new study led by Erik Trinkaus, anthropology professor at Washington University, St.
Humans may have started feasting on fish about 40,000 years agoJuly 7th, 2009 WASHINGTON - A new study by an international team of researchers has suggested that fish may have become an important part of the year-round diet for early humans in China as far back as 40,000 years ago. Freshwater fish are an important part of the diet of many peoples around the world, but it has been unclear when fish became an important part of the year-round diet for early humans.
Want something? Then talk to my right earJune 24th, 2009 LONDON - Humans prefer to be addressed in their right ear rather than their left. Current research suggests that we are more likely to perform a task when we receive the request in our right ear.
Bow and arrow may have been used for hunting before modern humansJune 19th, 2009 LONDON - In a new research, a pair of scientists has suggested that weapons like spears, and a bow and arrow, go back as far back as 100,000 years ago, predating modern humans. According to a report in New Scientist, the research was done by Matthew Sisk and John Shea from Stony Brook University in New York.
Humans related to orangutans, not chimps or gorillasJune 18th, 2009 WASHINGTON - In a new research, a team of scientists has suggested that humans most likely share a common ancestor with orangutans, not chimpanzees and gorillas. The research, done by scientists from the University of Pittsburgh and the Buffalo Museum of Science, reject as "problematic" the popular suggestion, based on DNA analysis, that humans are most closely related to chimpanzees, which they maintain is not supported by fossil evidence.
Darwin's belief that animals don't pick their mates by pure chance is correct, says expertJune 16th, 2009 WASHINGTON - About 150 years after Charles Darwin wrote defined 'mate selection' among animals as a deliberate process involving numerous factors, a Texas A and M University biologist has lent support to his beliefs that the choice of mates and sexual selection are beyond mere chance. Adam Jones, who has studied Darwin's work for years, says that the English naturalist's work has withstood decades of analysis and scrutiny.
Loading ...