House votes strict ban on abortion subsidies
WASHINGTON — A bipartisan House coalition voted Saturday to prohibit coverage of abortions in a new government-run health care plan that Democrats would establish to compete with private insurers.
The 240-194 vote on an amendment by Rep. Bart Stupak, D-Mich., was a blow to liberals, who would have allowed the Obama administration and its successors to decide whether abortions would be covered by the government plan. Sixty-four Democrats joined 176 Republicans in favor of the prohibition.
Stupak’s measure also would bar anyone getting federal health subsidies from purchasing private insurance polices that included abortion coverage.
“Let us stand together on principle — no public funding for abortions, no public funding for insurance policies that pay for abortions,” Stupak urged fellow lawmakers before the vote.
The amendment would bar the new government insurance plan from covering abortions, except in cases of rape, incest, or where the life of the mother is in danger. The Democrats’ original legislation would have allowed the government plan to cover abortions, if the Health and Human Services secretary decided it should.
The amendment also would prohibit people who receive new federal health subsidies from buying insurance plans that include abortion coverage.
The Democrats’ original bill would have allowed people getting federal subsidies to pay for abortion coverage with their own money. Abortion opponents dismissed that as an accounting gimmick.
Abortion rights advocates called the measure the biggest setback to women’s reproductive rights in decades. Anti-abortion Democrats forced House leaders to bring it up for a vote by threatening to oppose the underlying bill, and efforts to reach a compromise fell apart Friday night.
“Like it or not, this is a legal medical procedure and we should respect those who need to make this very personal decision,” said Rep. Diana DeGette, D-Colo.
Some Republicans considered voting “present” in hopes that might unravel support for the underlying health care bill among anti-abortion Democrats, but only one did, Rep. John Shadegg, R-Ariz.
“If I felt that the (health overhaul) bill could be killed by not advancing the Stupak amendment then it seems it would be prudent to vote in such a way that wouldn’t advance the bill, but it doesn’t appear that that’s a possibility,” Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., said before the vote.
The National Right to Life Committee and the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops lobbied lawmakers in both parties on the abortion measure. The bishops said they would oppose the bill if it lacked a strict prohibition on any federal funding for abortions.
Stupak’s language applies to policies sold in a federally regulated insurance exchange that would be set up in 2013. The overhaul bill envisions both private companies and the government offering policies in the exchange.
Under the Stupak amendment, people who do not receive federal insurance subsidies could buy private insurance plans in the exchange that include abortion coverage. People who receive federal subsidies could buy separate policies covering only abortions if they use only their own money to do it.
Companies selling insurance policies covering abortions would be required to offer identical policies without the abortion coverage.
Abortion-rights supporters say private insurers will not likely offer policies with abortion coverage in the exchange because many potential buyers will be getting federal subsidies and therefore wouldn’t be able to purchase them.
Around 21 million people are expected to get coverage through the exchange by 2019, according to the Congressional Budget Office. The majority of Americans who get their insurance coverage from their employers would not be affected.
Abortion-rights supporters say the restrictions in the amendment go further than current law.
A law called the Hyde amendment — which must be renewed annually — bars federal funding for abortion except in cases of rape, incest or if the mother’s life is in danger. The restrictions apply to Medicaid, forcing states that cover abortions for low-income women to pay for them with state revenues. Separate laws apply the restrictions to the federal employee health plan and the military.
Currently abortion coverage is widely available in the private market. A Guttmacher Institute study found that 87 percent of typical employer plans covered abortion in 2002. A Kaiser Family Foundation survey in 2003 found that 46 percent of workers in employer plans had abortion coverage. The studies asked different questions, which might help explain the disparity in the results.
Abortions in the first trimester typically cost between $350-$900, according to Planned Parenthood.
A health overhaul bill pending in the Senate also bars federal funding for abortion, but the language is less stringent. Discrepancies between the House and Senate measures would have to be reconciled before any final bill is passed.
(This version corrects the third paragraph to correct the description of the amendment — people getting subsidies could not buy insurance packages covering abortion, instead of people could not get subsidies to buy abortion coverage.)
Related News
Obama health care plan moves toward decisive debate in House; GOP united in oppositionNovember 7th, 2009 more images
more images
House opens debate on health care overhaul bill
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's landmark health care overhaul moved toward a vote in the House Saturday after anti-abortion lawmakers won a chance to knock out language that would let people who get federal subsidies buy insurance plans that include abortion coverage. Democratic leaders were hopeful they could pass the bill, giving Obama his biggest victory since last November's historic election, no matter how the abortion issue is decided.
Key details of House Democrats' health care overhaul legislationNovember 7th, 2009 Key details of Democrats' health overhaul billThe House health care bill passed Saturday would:
—Require most Americans to purchase health insurance or pay a fine. —Expand health care coverage to 36 million more people over the next decade.
Amendment would bar federal funding for abortion under health bill, except in extreme casesNovember 7th, 2009 Amendment blocks federal funding for abortionsWASHINGTON — A bipartisan coalition sought to impose stricter abortion limits on insurance sold under a new health care bill Saturday, hoping to leave their imprint on legislation otherwise crafted largely by more liberal lawmakers. Here is how coverage of abortion would work under their proposal, which applies to policies sold in a federally regulated insurance exchange that would be set up in 2013.
Budget Office: Gov't insurance plan would attract only 6m; charge more than private plansOctober 29th, 2009 Gov't insurance plan wouldn't draw the massesWASHINGTON — Congressional budget umpires say a government health insurance plan that's been a rallying cry for Democrats would not be a big draw with the public. The Congressional Budget Office estimated Thursday that only about 6 million people would sign up and that premiums for the government plan could be higher than for private coverage.
Abortion proving to be major hurdle as House Democrats try to shape health care overhaul billOctober 23rd, 2009 Abortion divides House Dems in health care debateWASHINGTON — House Democrats are at an impasse over whether their remake of the nation's health care system would effectively allow federal funding of abortion. More than two dozen anti-abortion Democrats believe it would, and while their opposition is unlikely to stall the legislation in the end, they are at odds with Democratic leaders just weeks ahead of anticipated floor action on the bill.
Health care issues: Paying for abortionsOctober 9th, 2009 Health care issues: Paying for abortionsA look at key issues in the health care debate:
THE ISSUE: Would new health care legislation allow abortions to be funded with tax money?
THE POLITICS: Abortion opponents say proposed government-sponsored health insurance plans would change federal policy by paying for abortions in many cases. For years, a restriction in the law that governs Medicaid — health insurance for the poor — has barred federal funding of abortions except in cases of rape, incest and danger to the mother's life.
Senate health negotiators cut the cost of their 10-year health overhaul plan to under $880BSeptember 14th, 2009 Senate negotiators pare costs of health care planWASHINGTON — Senate health care negotiators said Monday they've cut the cost of their 10-year coverage plan to under $880 billion, but they're not ready to shake hands yet on a bipartisan deal. Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., said he'll have a formal proposal by midweek — maybe as early as Tuesday — to meet a deadline for moving ahead on President Barack Obama's top domestic priority with or without Republican support.
Health care issues: The public insurance planSeptember 8th, 2009 Health care issues: The public insurance planA look at key issues in the health care debate:
THE ISSUE: Should Americans have the option of getting health insurance from a government plan that competes with private companies?
THE POLITICS: Many Democrats want to do away with private insurance and replace it with something resembling Medicare coverage for all, but that's not politically feasible. Offering the choice of a government insurance plan was a compromise within the Democratic Party.
FACT CHECK: Poll finds health overhaul myths gaining traction, fabled 'death panels' includedAugust 19th, 2009 FACT CHECK: Health overhaul myths taking rootWASHINGTON — The judgment is harsh in a new poll that finds Americans worried about the government taking over health insurance, cutting off treatment to the elderly and giving coverage to illegal immigrants. Harsh, but not based on facts.
Health care overhaul renews battle over federal funds for abortionsAugust 5th, 2009 Gov't insurance would allow coverage for abortionWASHINGTON — Health care legislation before Congress would allow a new government-sponsored insurance plan to cover abortions, a decision that would affect millions of women and recast federal policy on the divisive issue. Federal funds for abortions are now restricted to cases involving rape, incest or danger to the life of the mother.
Health overhaul legislation amended to bar requirements for abortion coverageJuly 31st, 2009 House lawmakers endorse measure opposing abortionWASHINGTON — Lawmakers have amended a sweeping health overhaul bill to ensure it does not require coverage of abortions. The anti-abortion measure was approved late Thursday in the House Energy and Commerce Committee as conservative Democrats banded with Republicans to support it.
Democratic abortion opponents say House bill could allow for govt money to end pregnanciesJuly 21st, 2009 Abortion is latest controversy in health overhaulWASHINGTON — Democratic lawmakers opposed to federal funding for abortions said Tuesday the House leadership's health care bill contains a "hidden mandate" that would allow taxpayer dollars to be used to end pregnancies. It's the latest controversy to hit the health care overhaul in a week that has seen Republicans sharpen their attacks and some Democrats start to waver on President Barack Obama's top domestic priority.
Dems want to let people who lose jobs keep employer-covered care until they find new coverageJuly 17th, 2009 House committee agrees to longer COBRA benefitsWASHINGTON — Lawmakers have amended a far-reaching health care overhaul bill to allow workers who lose their jobs to hang onto their employer-provided care until they get new coverage. The measure agreed to by voice vote in the House Education and Labor Committee affects the program known as COBRA.
House health plan would require individuals and employers to get insurance coverageJuly 14th, 2009 House health plan requires insurance coverageWASHINGTON — House Democrats want to require individuals and employers to get health insurance — or pay a penalty. For individuals, the penalty would be 2.5 percent of income — but it could go no higher than the average cost of health insurance.
Senate budget chairman doubts there are enough votes to back Obama's gov't insurance optionJune 14th, 2009 Conrad says gov't insurance plan short of supportWASHINGTON — The Democrat who heads the Senate Budget Committee says he doubts there are enough votes in the Senate to support President Barack Obama's plan for a government health insurance option. Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota says that there are good arguments for the proposal but probably not the votes it needs in the Senate.
Loading ...