Agency that insures bank deposits may need help
NEW YORK — The coffers of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. have been so depleted by the epidemic of collapsing financial institutions that analysts warn it could sink into the red by the end of this year.
That has happened only once before — during the savings-and-loan crisis of the early 1990s, when the FDIC was forced to borrow $15 billion from the Treasury and repay it later with interest. The government agency that guarantees depositors against the loss of their money in a bank failure may need its own lifeline.
The FDIC on Thursday will disclose how much is left in its insurance fund, and update the number of banks on its list of troubled institutions. That number shot up to 305 in the first quarter — the highest since 1994 and up from 252 late last year. FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair may also use the quarterly briefing to discuss how the agency plans to shore up its accounts.
Small and midsize banks across the country have been hurt by rising loan defaults in the recession. When they fail, the FDIC is responsible for making sure depositors don’t lose a cent.
It has two options to replenish its insurance fund in the short run: It can charge banks higher fees or it can take the more radical step of borrowing from the U.S. Treasury.
None of this means bank customers have anything to worry about. The FDIC is fully backed by the government, which means depositors’ accounts are guaranteed up to $250,000 per account. And it still has billions in loss reserves apart from the insurance fund.
Because of the surging bank failures, the FDIC’s board voted Wednesday to make it easier for private investors to buy failed financial institutions.
Private equity funds have been criticized for taking too many risks and paying managers too much. But these days fewer healthy banks are willing to buy ailing banks, and the depth of the banking crisis appears to have softened the FDIC’s resistance to private buyers.
Under the new rules, a buyer would need to maintain the failed bank’s reserves at levels equal to 10 percent of its assets. An earlier proposal set the requirement at 15 percent.
The new policy also eases the rules on when private investors must maintain minimum levels of capital that might be needed to bolster banks they own.
But the FDIC sought to guard against private equity funds that might want to quickly buy and sell at a profit: It required the investors to maintain a bank’s minimum capital levels for three years.
At least in theory, allowing private investors to buy failing banks would mean the FDIC could charge a higher price, shrinking the amount of losses the agency would have to cover.
Bair has not ruled out hiking premiums on banks for the second time this year or asking the Treasury for a short-term loan. She has said taking the longer-term step of drawing on the Treasury credit line is only for emergencies.
So far this year, 81 banks have failed, compared with just 25 last year — and only three in 2007. Hundreds more banks are expected to fall in coming years because of souring loans for commercial real estate. That threatens to deplete the FDIC’s fund.
“I think the public should expect the fund to go negative at some point,” said Gerard Cassidy, a banking analyst at RBC Capital Markets, which has predicted that up to 1,000 banks — or one in eight — could disappear within three years.
Either lifeline for the FDIC carries risks. Borrowing from the Treasury could be seen as another taxpayer bailout. But charging more in premiums would shrink profits at healthy banks, squeeze troubled ones and make lending even tighter.
“The more you levy these assessments on banks, the less money they have to lend to the general population,” said Camden Fine, president of the Independent Community Bankers of America, an industry group that represents 5,000 banks.
Last week’s failure of Guaranty Bank in Texas, the second-largest this year, is expected to cost the FDIC $3 billion. The FDIC recorded more than $19 billion in losses just through March.
The agency figures it will need $70 billion to cover bank failures through 2013, more than five times the $13 billion that was in the fund in March. The last time it was that low was during the S&L crisis in 1992, when the fund was down to $178 million.
Some critics say regulators have taken too long to shut down troubled banks. Chicago’s Corus Bankshares, for example, has staggered for weeks under the weight of bad real estate loans.
FDIC spokesman Andrew Gray said the agency seeks to strike a balance between helping troubled banks work through their problems “so there’s zero cost to the deposit fund,” and intervening quickly if there are no other options.
AP Business Writer Marcy Gordon contributed to this report from Washington.
Related News
Regulators close Warren Bank in Michigan; 96th US bank closed this yearOctober 2nd, 2009 Regulators close Mich. bank; 96th failure in '09NEW YORK — Regulators have shut down Warren Bank in Warren, Mich., the 96th U.S.
FDIC: bank failures to cost deposit fund $100 billion, seeks prepayment of $45 billion in feesSeptember 30th, 2009 FDIC says bank failures to cost around $100BWASHINGTON — Federal regulators expect bank failures to cost the deposit insurance fund about $100 billion in the next four years and the fund to be running at a deficit Wednesday. That is higher than an earlier estimate of $70 billion in failure costs through 2013.
Summary Box: FDIC weighs steps, including loans from banks, to shore up insurance fundSeptember 22nd, 2009 Summary Box: FDIC weighs steps to shore up fundTHE PROBLEM: The fund to insure deposits has been depleted by bank failures since the financial crisis struck. THE OPTIONS: Regulators could borrow billions from healthy banks, levy an extra fee on the industry, borrow from Treasury or collect banks' insurance premiums early.
Regulators take over 2 banking units of Irwin Financial; 94 bank failures so far this yearSeptember 18th, 2009 Regulators seize 2 banks; 94 failures this yearNEW YORK — Regulators shut down two banking units of Irwin Financial Corp. Friday, marking the 93rd and 94th failures this year of federally insured banks.
Regulators shut down bank in Missouri; makes 85 US bank failures this yearSeptember 4th, 2009 Regulators shut down bank in MissouriNEW YORK — Regulators on Friday shut down First Bank of Kansas City in Missouri, pushing to 85 the number of banks that have failed this year under the weight of the soured economy and rising loan defaults. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Regulators shut small banks in Maryland, Minnesota; makes 83 US bank failures this yearAugust 29th, 2009 Regulators shut banks in Maryland, MinnesotaWASHINGTON — Regulators on Friday shut down small banks in Maryland and Minnesota, pushing to 83 the number of bank failures this year amid the soured economy and rising loan defaults. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
FDIC lengthens tougher capital, exam requirements for newer banks to 7 yearsAugust 28th, 2009 FDIC lengthens requirements for newer banksWASHINGTON — Federal banking officials worried about rising bank failures will require new banks to meet stricter regulatory standards for seven years rather than the previous three-year requirement. The new rules, outlined in a letter Friday from the U.S.
Summary Box: FDIC says bank deposit insurance fund down 20 percent in second quarterAugust 27th, 2009 Summary Box: Bank insurance fund down 20 percentDWINDLING INSURANCE FUND: The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. says the fund that guarantees bank deposits (up to $250,000 for regular accounts) dropped 20 percent in the second quarter to $10.4 billion, its lowest point since 1992.
Regulators shut Dwelling House S&L in Pittsburgh; 73rd US bank failure this yearAugust 14th, 2009 Small thrift in Pennsylvania shut by regulatorsWASHINGTON — Regulators on Friday shut down Dwelling House Savings and Loan Association, a small bank in Pennsylvania, boosting to 73 the number of federally insured banks that have failed this year. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Regulators close 2 banks in Florida, marking 71 US bank failures this yearAugust 8th, 2009 Regulators close 2 banks in FloridaNEW YORK — Regulators on Friday shut down two banks in Florida, bringing to 71 the number of federally insured banks to fail this year under the weight of the weak economy and rising loan losses. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Regulators close 2 banks in Florida, 1 in Oregon, marking 72 US bank failures this yearAugust 8th, 2009 Regulators close 3 banks in Fla., Ore.; total 72NEW YORK — Regulators on Friday shut down two banks in Florida and one in Oregon, bringing to 72 the number of federally insured banks to fail this year under the weight of the weak economy and rising loan losses. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Regulators shut First Piedmont Bank in Georgia; 54th US bank to fail this yearJuly 18th, 2009 Regulators shut small Georgia bank; 54th this yearWASHINGTON — Regulators have shut down First Piedmont Bank in Georgia, the 54th federally insured bank to fail this year. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.
Regulators shut down 3 small banks, bringing this year's failed bank tally to 40June 20th, 2009 US regulators close 3 small banksNEW YORK — Regulators have shut down three more small banks, pushing this year's tally of failed banks to 40. One bank closed Friday was in North Carolina, another in Georgia, and the third was in Kansas.
Regulators shut down 2 small Southern banks, bringing this year's failed bank tally to 39June 20th, 2009 Regulators close 2 small Southern banksNEW YORK — Regulators on Friday shut down a small bank in Wilmington, N.C. and another small bank in Fayetteville, Ga., pushing this year's tally of failed banks up to 39.
Regulators shut failed American Southern Bank in Ga.; 26th failure this year beats 2008 totalApril 24th, 2009 Regulators shut American Southern Bank in GeorgiaCHARLOTTE, N.C. — Regulators on Friday shut down American Southern Bank in Georgia, boosting the number of failures this year to 26 — more bank closures than in all of last year.
Loading ...
August 27th, 2009 at 6:07 pm
Kind of hard for me to look at all this and not think that we’re running up into another Great Depressionary period. Which is one of the reasons I’m doing all I can to get out of debt asap. Looking too at precious metals.