EPA moves to regulate smokestack greenhouse gases
WASHINGTON — Proposed regulations would require power plants, factories and refineries to reduce greenhouse gases by installing the best available technology and improving energy efficiency whenever a facility is significantly changed or built.
The Environmental Protection Agency proposal announced Wednesday applies to any industrial plant that emits at least 25,000 tons of greenhouse gases a year.
These large sources are responsible for 70 percent of the greenhouse gas emissions — mainly carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels — that are released in the U.S., the EPA said.
“By using the power and authority of the Clean Air Act, we can begin reducing emissions from the nation’s largest greenhouse gas-emitting facilities without placing an undue burden on the businesses that make up the vast majority of our economy,” EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said. “We know the corner coffee shop is no place to look for meaningful carbon reductions.”
Earlier this year, the Obama administration announced it would start developing the first-ever greenhouse gas emissions standards for cars and trucks. Those regulations, which would take effect in 2010, compel the EPA to control greenhouse gases from large smokestacks as well, the agency said.
Industry groups immediately questioned the agency’s argument. They charged that the EPA was skirting the law, since the Clean Air Act typically covers any facility releasing more than 250 tons a year of a recognized pollutant. That threshold would require more facilities to fall under the new regulations.
“This proposal incorrectly assumes that one industry’s greenhouse gas emissions are worse than another’s,” said Charles T. Drevna, president of the National Petrochemical and Refiners Association.
Jeff Holmstead, a former top EPA air pollution official who is now a lobbyist for the energy industry, said the agency was trying to “fit a square peg into a round hole.”
“Normally, it takes an act of Congress to change the words of a statute enacted by Congress, and many of us are very curious to see EPA’s legal justification for today’s proposal,” Holmstead said.
Jackson, speaking at a news conference at a climate change summit being hosted by California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, said the rule was legally defensible.
“The EPA would not propose a rule that we didn’t believe … made good legal sense,” she said.
The EPA’s announcement came hours after Senate Democrats unveiled legislation that would set limits on the amount of greenhouse gases from large industrial sources. The Senate bill, unlike the House-passed version, preserves the EPA’s authority to regulate under the Clean Air Act.
Environmentalists said Wednesday the two efforts go hand-in-hand.
“You can’t have one without the other if we’re going to be successful in moving America to clean energy,” said Emily Figdor, director of the global warming program at Environment America, an advocacy group.
The move will probably increase pressure on Congress to pass a bill to avoid less flexible, and what Republicans said would be more costly, regulations. Supporters of the legislation have already used pending EPA rules as leverage to get Congress to act.
Senate Republicans have already attempted to block the EPA from issuing regulations to buy more time for Congress to work on a bill. At least one Republican leader, Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, said Wednesday that Congress would try to stop the EPA again.
On the Net:
Environmental Protection Agency: www.epa.gov
Related News
Texas activists sue state over lack of greenhouse gas restrictions for new power plantsOctober 6th, 2009 Activists sue Texas to restrict greenhouse gasesDALLAS — Environmental activists sued the Texas environmental agency Tuesday in an effort to force the state to regulate greenhouse gases, asking that coal-fired power plant projects be halted until that happens. The Texas Commission on Environmental Quality issues air pollution permits that set limits on toxic releases, but the agency says there is no need to regulate carbon dioxide.
Obama directs government to lead by example on global warming, oil useOctober 6th, 2009 Obama: Government to set global warming exampleWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama wants the federal government to set the example when it comes to global warming. In an executive order signed Monday, Obama required all agencies to do what he wants companies operating power plants, running refineries and making automobiles to do: reduce heat-trapping gases.
Obama directs federal agencies to set targets to reduce their global warming pollutionOctober 5th, 2009 Obama puts government on greenhouse-gas dietWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama is putting the federal government on a greenhouse-gas diet. In an executive order signed Monday, Obama directed all agencies to set the first-ever targets for reducing climate-altering pollution from government buildings, fleets and federal workers' commutes.
Poll: Most Americans approve of Obama's efforts on energy policy, including cap-and-trade planAugust 28th, 2009 Poll: Americans support Obama on energy issuesWASHINGTON — A new poll says most Americans support the way President Barack Obama is dealing with energy issues, including his plan to limit greenhouse gases with a controversial cap-and-trade approach. A Washington Post-ABC News poll published Friday finds that while support is slipping for the president's heath-care proposals, support for his changes in energy policy remains firm.
New process can remove sulfur components and CO2 from power plant emissionsAugust 19th, 2009 WASHINGTON - Scientists at the US Department of Energy's Pacific Northwest National Laboratory have developed a reusable organic liquid that can pull harmful gases such as carbon dioxide or sulfur dioxide out of industrial emissions from power plants. The process could directly replace current methods and allow power plants to capture double the amount of harmful gases in a way that uses no water, less energy and saves money.
Greenpeace: China's top 3 energy suppliers emit more greenhouse gases than BritainJuly 28th, 2009 Greenpeace: China power companies hurting climateBEIJING — China's three largest energy suppliers emitted more greenhouse gases than all of Britain last year, environmental watchdog Greenpeace China said in a report issued Tuesday. The report reflects the heavy reliance on coal that is hampering China's efforts to tackle climate change.
Climate campaigners say EU carbon trading program may allow polluters avoid emissions cutsJuly 20th, 2009 Campaigners say EU carbon trading is flawedBRUSSELS — Climate change campaigners claimed Monday that flaws in the European Union's carbon trading program could allow major polluters avoid any real reduction in greenhouse gas emissions during the economic downturn. Cap-and-trade forms the main plank of EU efforts to slash carbon dioxide output by a fifth by 2020.
Major provisions of House Democrats' climate and energy billJune 25th, 2009 Major provisions of House climate and energy billHighlights of climate bill approved passed by the House:
— Reducing greenhouse gases by 17 percent from 2005 levels by 2020 and 83 percent by 2050 through a cap-and-trade program that allows pollution permits to be bought and sold. — Limiting emissions from major industrial sources, including power plants, factories, refineries and electricity and natural gas distributors.
THE INFLUENCE GAME: After 'cow tax' campaign, Congress and EPA steer clear of cattle burpsJune 20th, 2009 THE INFLUENCE GAME: Excuse me! Lobby wins on burpsWASHINGTON — One contributor to global warming — bigger than coal mines, landfills and sewage treatment plants — is being left out of efforts by the Obama administration and House Democrats to limit greenhouse gas emissions. Cow burps. Belching from the nation's 170 million cattle, sheep and pigs produces about one-quarter of the methane released in the U.S.
World Bank offers India $180-mn loan to upgrade power plantsJune 19th, 2009 NEW DELHI - The World Bank will extend a $180-million (Rs.900-crore) loan to India for upgrading its polluting coal-fired power plants and bringing down carbon emission, it said Friday. "The project, which is expected to lower carbon emissions and boost power production at these plants, is co-financed with a $45.4-million grant from the Global Environment Facility (GEF)," World Bank said in a statement.
Study: US carbon capture technology key to getting China to cut greenhouse gases.June 19th, 2009 Study: US technology key to China and climateWASHINGTON — Finding an economical way to capture carbon dioxide from existing coal burning power plants is key to getting China to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions as well as for U.S. efforts to combat global warming, says a study being released Friday.
3.6 trillion metric tons and rising: NYers can now track greenhouse gases on big billboardJune 18th, 2009 NYC billboard monitors rising greenhouse gasesNEW YORK — New Yorkers have long been able to keep tabs on the national debt, but they now have a highly visible counter to track greenhouse gas emissions. A 70-foot-high billboard outside Madison Square Garden and Pennsylvania Station, not far from the Empire State Building, features a carbon counter.
New York City billboard, Internet widget help the public monitor greenhouse gasesJune 18th, 2009 New York City billboard monitors greenhouse gasesNEW YORK — How are those greenhouse gases doing?
New York City residents and visitors will be able to monitor the situation, thanks to a giant billboard in Manhattan. A widget also will be provided to Web sites and blogs around the world.
Poor families could receive hundreds of dollars from climate bill to offset energy costsJune 8th, 2009 Climate bill to pay hundreds of dollars in rebatesWASHINGTON — Low-income families will receive hundreds of dollars a year to help pay higher energy bills if Congress enacts the first-ever limits on the gases blamed for global warming, according to a new analysis. But it is unclear just how much more those families will have to pay for energy.
White House document says EPA regulation of greenhouse gases will have serious economic costsMay 12th, 2009 White House memo challenges EPA finding on warmingWASHINGTON — An Environmental Protection Agency proposal that could lead to regulating the gases blamed for global warming will prove costly for factories, small businesses and other institutions, according to a White House document. The nine-page memo is a compilation of opinions made by a dozen federal agencies and departments during an internal review before the EPA issued a finding in April that greenhouse gases pose dangers to public health and welfare.
Loading ...