Health care debate could derail over gov’t plan
WASHINGTON — President Barack Obama started his health care push by reaching out to all sides. Now it’s stuck in a partisan mess over his idea of a government insurance plan that would compete with private companies.
The idea got little attention when Obama proposed it as a candidate. Now, however, it’s jeopardizing his effort to win broad political support for changes that would guarantee coverage for all and try to rein in medical costs.
Supporters of a government plan say it would pressure private insurers to keep premiums reasonable. But experts say Obama may not need a full-blown federal program to achieve that.
For example, nonprofit cooperatives — independent of the government — could be set up to offer affordable coverage.
Or maybe a government plan could be used only as a last resort, entering a state or local market if private insurers fail to keep coverage affordable.
“There are lots of ways to fulfill those functions,” said economist Len Nichols of the nonpartisan New America Foundation. Nichols, who directs the foundation’s health care program, is working with lawmakers trying to find a compromise on the contentious issue.
“There are ways to finesse this,” said Robert Reischauer, president of the Urban Institute public policy center. “One way is to design the authority for a public plan and lock it up in a closet. If the private sector fails to bend the cost curve, then we unlock the closet and let the public plan out.”
Such suggestions may be of no avail. The partisan battle lines are hardening.
Republicans, almost unanimously, say a government plan would lead to a Washington takeover of the health care system.
“A public plan is a nonstarter,” said Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah. “They are trying several ways to come up with a public plan without calling it that. I just don’t see that as working.”
Sen. Tom Harkin, D-Iowa, answered “no” when asked if Democrats could live with legislation that guaranteed coverage for all, but did not include a public plan.
“I think that’s the essential part of health reform, and that is to have one public plan that is portable. No matter where you live, no matter where you move, you know you can get this plan,” Harkin said.
The impasse is rooted in ideological divisions that doomed former President Bill Clinton’s health care plan in the 1990s. “The public option discussion is a mirror of the debate we’ve been having for 60 years about the government’s role in health care,” said Sen. Ron Wyden, D-Ore.
Part of the problem seems to be that Obama hasn’t spelled out what he wants in a public plan, even as he expresses strong support for the idea.
The government already has a public plan for the elderly — Medicare. And there’s Medicaid for the poor.
But a government plan for middle-class workers and their families would be new.
Under some scenarios, a government plan could undermine one of Obama’s central health care promises: that people can keep the coverage they have if they like it.
A recent analysis by the Lewin Group consulting firm found that if the new government plan was modeled on Medicare and open to all employers and individuals, it would swamp the private insurance industry. Employers and individuals would flock to the public plan because of its lower premiums. Private insurance enrollment would plummet by about two-thirds.
But the analysis also found that a public plan that was only open to individuals and small businesses would have much more limited consequences for private insurers, and could reduce significantly the number of uninsured.
Obama’s campaign proposal suggested the latter option, a public plan offered to individuals and small businesses having a hard time finding and keeping insurance. It would be a choice, along with private insurance plans, through a new kind of purchasing pool called an exchange. Studies have found that in most states a single insurer currently dominates the small business market.
As president, Obama hasn’t publicly revisited the issue in any detail.
Insurers are determined to avoid any kind of government plan, even as they have pledged to work with Obama to try to lower costs. Employer groups, hospitals and doctors have also expressed concerns. But the public plan is hugely popular with the Democratic activists Obama is counting on for grass-roots support in getting the health care bill through Congress.
The bill expected to emerge in the House this summer probably will have a strong government plan. In the Senate, where a key committee begins work on the legislation this coming week, it’s unclear whether a public plan can pass because some moderate Democrats also have concerns. The debate could keep going into the fall.
At a town hall meeting Thursday in Green Bay, Wis., Obama addressed public plan critics.
Speaking of Republican opposition, Obama said: “It’s not clear that it’s based on any evidence, as much as it is their thinking, their fear, that … once you have a public plan, that government will take over the entire health care system.”
Associated Press writer Ken Thomas contributed to this report.
Related News
Senate Finance Committee votes down creation of public insurance planSeptember 30th, 2009 Public plan goes down in Senate Finance CommitteeWASHINGTON — The Senate Finance Committee has voted against creating a new government health insurance plan to compete with the private market. The 15-to-8 vote could forecast the fate of the public option in the Senate as a whole.
Health care issues: The pros, cons and politics of health insurance cooperatives, in briefSeptember 30th, 2009 Health care issues: Insurance cooperativesA look at key issues in the health care debate:
THE ISSUE: Are consumer-run co-ops a realistic alternative to a new government-run insurance option?
THE POLITICS: The Democratic push for a government-run insurance plan to compete in the marketplace is running into brisk resistance in Congress. As a possible compromise, some lawmakers have proposed establishing nonprofit insurance co-ops instead of a public plan.
Proposed tax on high-value insurance plans sparking concerns among Capitol Hill DemocratsSeptember 17th, 2009 Dems attack proposed new tax on insurance plansWASHINGTON — A proposed tax on high-value health insurance policies is sparking widespread opposition from congressional Democrats who fear it would hit middle-class workers like coal miners in West Virginia. The opposition sprang up Thursday, a day after Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus proposed the tax to pay for his health overhaul bill.
GOP Chairman Steele wary of health care cooperatives, calls them 'back door' to public optionSeptember 17th, 2009 GOP head calls co-ops 'backdoor' to public optionWASHINGTON — Republican Party Chairman Michael Steele says he fears the health insurance cooperatives envisioned in the bill the Senate Finance Committee is promoting amounts to a "back door to a public option."
Interviewed Thursday on CBS's "The Early Show," Steele also said he doubts Republicans will embrace the legislation produced by committee Chairman Max Baucus and the "Gang of Six," — Baucus, two other Democrats and three Republicans. Steele said he believes that the "co-ops in this bill represent government control.
Obama pitches public option on health care overhauls, says he's open on 'how to set this up'September 12th, 2009 Obama: Public option helps health care competitionMINNEAPOLIS — President Barack Obama says he wants to see a government-run option in the health care overhaul and remains open on "how to set this up."
Speaking at a rally Saturday in Minneapolis, Obama was responding to growing concerns that the government could squeeze out private insurers and lead to a federal takeover of health care. Obama stressed that a government-run plan would be one of many options for people seeking affordable care.
Health care overhaul would include not-for-profit option, give insurance companies competitionSeptember 9th, 2009 Not-for-profit public option part of health planWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama says a not-for-profit public option needs to be available as part of any health care overhaul. He says it would keep insurance companies honest.
Health care issues: The public insurance planSeptember 8th, 2009 Health care issues: The public insurance planA look at key issues in the health care debate:
THE ISSUE: Should Americans have the option of getting health insurance from a government plan that competes with private companies?
THE POLITICS: Many Democrats want to do away with private insurance and replace it with something resembling Medicare coverage for all, but that's not politically feasible. Offering the choice of a government insurance plan was a compromise within the Democratic Party.
Top House Democrat says he could support health care bill without a public optionSeptember 8th, 2009 Prospects dimming for gov't insurance planWASHINGTON — Prospects for a government insurance plan appeared to be sinking fast Tuesday as lawmakers returned to Capitol Hill a day ahead of a major health care speech by President Barack Obama. House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, D-Md., told reporters a Medicare-like plan for middle-class Americans and their families isn't essential for him to back legislation.
Kerry says compromise on health care overhaul's public option may be necessary, but not yetAugust 30th, 2009 Kerry: Compromise may be necessary but not yetWASHINGTON — A leading Democratic senator says backers of a public option in President Barack Obama's attempt to overhaul health care may need to compromise on the issue but adds that such a point hasn't been reached yet. Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts suggested that compromise on the public option could become necessary if and when Democrats get to the point where they are not going to get there.
Congressional liberals press for government-run health insurance optionAugust 18th, 2009 Liberals push for public health insurance planWASHINGTON — Congressional liberals are telling the Obama administration that a health overhaul bill cannot pass unless it includes a new government-run insurance option. The Congressional Progressive Caucus, made up of more than 80 liberal House members, wrote to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius expressing opposition to her weekend comments suggesting a public option was not essential to a health overhaul.
Republican lawmakers fail to strip government-run option from health care billJuly 16th, 2009 GOP fails to strip public option from health billWASHINGTON — Republicans have failed to strip a government-run benefits plan from the House bill overhauling health care. The House Ways and Means Committee voted 25-15 on Thursday to keep the government-run option in the bill, rejecting an amendment by Wisconsin Republican Rep.
Senators say finding middle ground on a public insurance plan is a key to health care overhaulJuly 5th, 2009 Senators say compromise key to health care billWASHINGTON — It will take a compromise on a government option for insurance if the Senate is to agree on a health care overall before next month's break, two senators said Sunday. President Barack Obama is pushing for an Aug.
Senate health committee Democrats put finishing touches on public insurance optionJune 30th, 2009 Senate health panel readies gov't insurance optionWASHINGTON — Senators on a key committee are putting the finishing touches on a government health insurance option that they hope will win broad support among Democrats and the public. According to a draft summary circulating Tuesday, the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee proposal calls for a nationwide plan to be run by the federal government.
Senate budget chairman doubts there are enough votes to back Obama's gov't insurance optionJune 14th, 2009 Conrad says gov't insurance plan short of supportWASHINGTON — The Democrat who heads the Senate Budget Committee says he doubts there are enough votes in the Senate to support President Barack Obama's plan for a government health insurance option. Sen. Kent Conrad of North Dakota says that there are good arguments for the proposal but probably not the votes it needs in the Senate.
Senators to weigh Democrats' plans to offer government health insurance to middle classMay 14th, 2009 Health insurance from Uncle Sam gets a lookWASHINGTON — Look out Aetna, Humana and UnitedHealthcare. Senators are meeting behind closed doors to consider whether the federal government should jump into the health insurance business.
June 25th, 2009 at 7:49 pm
What is the point being against Obamas new health care plan? I dont know about you but I am sick and tired of paying blue cross blue shield 320 a month. Our insurance compaines are jokes, what I pay now is more than most car payments each month. As far as people being afraid of the the government stepping in and taking over, SO WHAT!!!! What dont they have their hands in? All of the crazy laws we have that dont make sense, and alot of people are worried about some help. The only people that hurting America are us Americans. This is the land of the proud and free not the broke and help every other country. This last year is the first in a long time where I have seen support to our country. Just sit back and enjoy the ride. If we do not band together and fix this problem all of our lives will be worse. Just to break it down one more time I pay 4000 a year in healt insurance, that does not include eye and dental which is only 360 more a year? what could you do with that much? Maybe pay most of your utilities for a year, or five months of house payments? Or maybe even food for your family for a year? From a angry husband, father, and American.