H. Josef Hebert
CBO: Climate bill costs to be modest.
WASHINGTON — A nonpartisan congressional study projects only modest household cost increases as a result of a Democratic proposal to limit carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, contradicting claims by many Republican lawmakers that the climate legislation amounts to a huge energy tax on average Americans.
The Congressional Budget Office report estimates that the proposed limits on greenhouse gases required by the House bill would produce a net additional cost to the economy of $22 billion a year by 2020, or an average cost per household of $175 after various cost-saving measures included in the bill are taken into account.
The poorest households actually would save $40 a year while those in the highest income category would face a net increase of $245 a year, the report estimates.
The findings contrast sharply with cost projections — some as high as $3,100 per household — use by many Republicans including House Republican leader John Boehner of Ohio who repeatedly has blasted the Democrat’s climate legislation as economically devastating to average Americans.
“This analysis underscores that this legislation is effective and affordable,” Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., one of the climate bill’s chief sponsors, said Monday.
Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass., also a leading co-sponsor, compared the cost to “a postage stamp a day” and not the economic catastrophe suggested by the bill’s opponents.
The CBO study was released as House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., struggled to get broader support for the bill from farm-state Democrats, who have been trying to get changes in the legislation to ease the cost burden on farmers and people in rural areas of the country who under the bill may face higher electricity costs than those in urban centers.
These essential compromises have yet to be worked out, leaving in doubt Pelosi’s goal to bring the climate legislation up for a vote by week’s end before lawmakers depart for the July 4 holiday recess.
The bill, covering nearly 1,000 pages, calls for a 17 percent reduction in carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases by 2020 from 2005 levels, and an 83 percent reduction by mid-century. Carbon dioxide, produced from burning fossil fuels, especially coal, is the leading manmade greenhouse gas linked to global warming.
The reductions would be made by capping emissions on key polluting sources — coal burning power plants, refineries, factories and from motor vehicles, forcing a shift to cleaner energy and more conservation. The polluters would be provided emission permits with the cap declining each year. Some 85 percent of the permits would be given away, especially to energy intensive sectors of the economy. But others would be sold by the government and proceeds used to help people meet higher energy costs.
The CBO study focuses on costs that would occur in 2020 when the economy would be expected to have adjusted to the change imposed by putting a price on carbon pollution.
Republicans, responding to the study, said the report acknowledges that people will face higher energy costs.
“This analysis shows average American household would pay $770 more per year with costs reaching as high as $1,380 per year,” said Rep. Dave Camp of Michigan, the ranking Republican on the Ways and Means Committee who had requested the report. He referred in a statement to “gross” cost figures in the report that do not take into account what the CBO analysis said the bill provides for cost savings and offsets.
Camp’s spokesman, Sage Eastman, said the report also “ignores the transitional costs, the negative impact of jobs and earnings during the transitional period” before 2020.
The CBO study said the aggregate most of the costs of the cap on greenhouse gases “would be offset by income and other benefits provided to households” under the bill.
The overall annual cost of compliance with the emissions reductions before any offsets, credits or rebates was projected by CBO to be $110 billion in 2020, or about $890 per household. But the report said $85 billion “would flow back to U.S. households in the form of direct relief and indirectly through allocations to businesses and governments” with an additional net benefit of $2.7 billion as a result of other provisions.
On the Net:
Congressional Budget Office: www.cbo.gov
| - Texas oil, chemical industries worry EPA crackdown on pollution permits could get costly
- Calif. considers strict energy standards for TVs, while manufacturers say it will limit choice
- Key US senator says it's possible Congress will pass bill to slow global warming by December
- Plan to shift businesses away from coal, fossil fuel stirs Rust Belt debate on energy, jobs
- Climate plan to shift businesses away from coal, fossil stirs Rust Belt debate on energy, jobs
- California lawmakers, meeting through weekend, fail again to reach deal on water
- In sunny southwestern Colorado, natural gas industry feels burned by shift to solar power
- Analysis: Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize, but some wonder why
|
Related News
Obama's top energy adviser says no way Congress can pass climate change bill this yearOctober 2nd, 2009 Obama adviser says no climate change law this yearWASHINGTON — President Barack Obama's top energy adviser says there is no way Congress will be able to pass a bill on climate change this year. "That's not going to happen," the adviser, Carol Browner, said Friday.
Modest long-term economic costs projected in climate bill compared to overall growthSeptember 18th, 2009 Report: Climate bill costs could be modestWASHINGTON — The long-term economic costs of a climate bill being considered in Congress would be "comparatively modest" in light of expected overall economic growth over the next 40 years, according to a congressional report released Friday. The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office estimated that the bill, which would impose a "cap and trade" system to reduce greenhouse gases, would cause the economy, or GDP, to be a quarter to three-quarters of 1 percent lower in 2020 than it otherwise would be.
Report says early costs of climate bill will be modest, with prices rising 20 percent by 2030August 5th, 2009 Report: Early costs of climate bill will be modestWASHINGTON — Climate change legislation before Congress would boost electricity prices by about 20 percent by 2030, although most of the increases wouldn't begin until after 2020, a government analysis concluded Tuesday. The Energy Information Administration said the ability to contain the cost to consumers depends largely on whether the country is successful in a "large scale" expansion of nuclear power and renewable energy sources that do not emit greenhouse gases and the deployment of carbon-capture technology at coal plants.
Report concludes only broad action on climate will achieve required pollution cutsAugust 3rd, 2009 Broad action on climate needed to achieve cutsWASHINGTON — If global warming is to be addressed without breaking people's pocketbooks, no single answer will do the job, a research group tied to the electric utility industry says in a new study that concludes the problem must be attacked from many directions. The report released Monday says that needed greenhouse gas reductions can be achieved at a reasonable cost to electricity consumers if the problem is broadly addressed, including building new nuclear power plants, requiring coal plants to capture their carbon dioxide, expanding use of renewable energy, improving energy efficiency, and putting more electric cars on the road.
Sen. Voinovich places hold on EPA nominee in spat over climate bill studyJuly 16th, 2009 Senator holds up EPA nominee over climate studyWASHINGTON — A Republican senator is blocking the nomination of a top Environmental Protection Agency official over what he calls a flawed study of the climate bill recently passed in the House. Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, said the hold is unrelated to the qualifications of Robert Perciasepe, nominated to become the EPA's deputy administrator.
UK government presents plan to cut carbon emissions, add 'green' jobs in renewable energyJuly 15th, 2009 Britain presents plans to cut emissions, add jobsLONDON — The British government detailed ambitious plans Wednesday to cut carbon emissions substantially by 2020, and said 40 percent of the country's electricity by then would come from renewable sources. The proposal on fighting climate change envisions expansions in wind energy as well as continued use of nuclear power and clean coal.
Why do taller guys end up earning more?July 14th, 2009 SYDNEY - Taller men are able to earn more than their shorter counterparts simply because they are perceived as being more intelligent and powerful, according to a new study. The study 'Does size matter' used newly available data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) survey to estimate the relationship between hourly wages and two aspects of body size: height and body mass index (BMI).
Climate change: developed countries unwilling to commit to 2020 targetsJuly 9th, 2009 L'AQUILA - Developed countries comprising the G8 are unwilling to commit themselves to reducing greenhouse gas emissions drastically by 2020, despite scientists across the world and developing countries urging them to do so. With the issue of climate change becoming significant during the G8-G5 summit here, especially in the run-up to the UN climate change summit to be held in Copenhagen this December, emerging economies of the G5 are exerting pressure on the G8 to commit to earlier targets on reducing emissions.
Obama officials urge Senate to follow House and pass bill limiting greenhouse gasesJuly 7th, 2009 Obama officials urge Senate to act on climateWASHINGTON — Saying global warming poses unprecedented threats to Americans' way of life, four of President Barack Obama's top environmental and energy officials urged the Senate on Tuesday to pass legislation to reduce the pollution linked to the planet's rising temperature. The heads of the Energy Department, Agriculture Department, Interior Department and Environmental Protection Agency told a Senate panel it should pass a bill similar to one the House narrowly cleared late last month.
Democrats scrambling to find enough vote to pass historic climate change legislationJune 26th, 2009 Democrats hunting for enough climate bill votesWASHINGTON — Democrats scrambled for votes Friday to push through a historic and hotly contested bill to combat global warming and usher in an era of cleaner but more expensive energy. To Republican opponents, it's the largest tax increase ever.
House Democrats clear the way for floor vote on climate change bill, vote expected to be closeJune 26th, 2009 Wide-ranging energy measure ready for floor voteWASHINGTON — The House has set the stage for a historic vote on hotly contested legislation to combat global warming and overhaul U.S. energy policy.
Handful of undecided Democrats hold key to whether House passes historic global warming billJune 26th, 2009 Handful of Democrats hold key to climate billWASHINGTON — A handful of undecided Democrats hold the key to whether the House will confront global warming and begin a shift away from fossil fuels to cleaner sources of energy. House Democratic leaders were scrambling to round up additional votes to pass the climate legislation Friday before lawmakers depart for a weeklong July 4 holiday recess.
Republicans call for more time on climate bill as House launches days of hearingsApril 21st, 2009 Republicans say climate bill not ready for debateWASHINGTON — As Congress begins to debate climate change in earnest, the science is taking a back seat to economics: How much will it cost to slow the earth's warming because of man-made pollution — and what's the cost of doing nothing?
A key House committee begins four days of hearings on climate legislation Tuesday, but the challenge of getting bipartisan support immediately became apparent. Even before the hearings, Republican members of the Energy and Commerce Committee argued that the panel's Democratic leaders are moving too quickly to try to push the legislation through.
Study argues energy efficiency can offset cost of addressing climate changeApril 21st, 2009 High cost of addressing climate change challengedWASHINGTON — An environmental group is challenging claims that major reductions in greenhouse gases would lead to soaring energy costs. The Union of Concerned Scientists says its analysis, using Energy Department computer models, show that higher electric and gasoline costs will be offset by improvements in energy and automobile efficiency.
Pelosi vows to pass legislation addressing climate change this year as House begins hearingsApril 21st, 2009 Pelosi vows climate bill this yearWASHINGTON — House Speaker Nancy Pelosi says she's determined to pass legislation addressing climate change this year. Pelosi noted that Wednesday will be celebrated as Earth Day.
June 24th, 2009 at 12:24 am
The article fails to mention that the CBO study recognizes that there would at least be an average $1400 tax per household. It assumes that funds will be restributed by the government to provide relief. This is nothing but an expensive energy welfare program that has neglible environmental benefits.