New damages trial for Wyeth in Ark. hormones case
LITTLE ROCK, Ark. — Wyeth Pharmaceuticals will get a new trial to determine if the drugmaker should pay punitive damages to a woman who got breast cancer after taking hormone replacement therapy, a federal appeals court ruled Monday.
The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis ruled on an appeal by the woman, who sued Wyeth and drugmaker Upjohn Co., and an appeal by the two companies.
An Arkansas jury had sided with Donna Scroggin in her lawsuit against Wyeth and Upjohn, awarding her $2.75 million in compensatory damages and $27 million in punitive damages in February 2008. Jurors concluded Wyeth inadequately warned the Little Rock woman that its drugs Premarin and Prempro carried an increased risk of breast cancer. The suit also involved Upjohn’s Provera, an estrogen-only drug.
U.S. District Judge Bill Wilson struck down the punitive damages award in July 2008, saying certain testimony from former Food and Drug Administration official Dr. Suzanne Parisian, who was the plaintiff’s regulatory expert, shouldn’t have been allowed at trial.
Monday’s ruling by a three-judge panel of the appeals court upheld the jury’s compensatory damage award, but also upheld Wilson’s decision that Upjohn should not have to pay punitive damages. However, the appeals court said a new trial must be held to determine if Wyeth should pay them.
“Scroggin presented sufficient evidence to submit the question of punitive damages (against Wyeth) to the jury, even without” the testimony from Scroggin’s expert, the appeals decision said.
The appeals court said Wilson analyzed the punitive-damages evidence against Wyeth on a piece-by-piece basis, “explaining that each piece failed to present clear and convincing evidence of reckless indifference.”
“This individualized treatment of the evidence may inadvertently have obscured the full scope of Wyeth’s conduct that the evidence collectively portrayed,” the appeals court decision said. “A jury could reasonably construe Wyeth’s documents as repeated efforts over many years to undermine information and studies that attempted to show a breast-cancer link.”
Both Wyeth, based at Madison, N.J., and Upjohn are now part of New York-based pharmaceutical giant Pfizer Inc. A man who answered the telephone at Wyeth after business hours Monday said no one was available to comment on the appeals court’s ruling.
A telephone number was not listed for Scroggin in Little Rock.
Related News
Jury deliberations continue in civil trial over New Orleans crime camera programOctober 29th, 2009 Deliberations continue in New Orleans camera caseNEW ORLEANS — Jury deliberations continue in a civil case over the New Orleans crime camera program. Trial began Sept.
Arkansas Supreme Court says it will review SWEPCO case about the proposed $1.6B power plantOctober 22nd, 2009 Arkansas high court to review SWEPCO plant caseLITTLE ROCK, Ark. — The Arkansas Supreme Court said Thursday it will review a case involving Southwestern Electric Power Company's planned coal-fired power plant in south Arkansas.
Federal judge awards $3 million to 2 teens who sued evangelist Alamo's alleged enforcerOctober 22nd, 2009 $3M awarded in suit against alleged Alamo enforcerLITTLE ROCK, Ark. — A fugitive accused of beating two teenagers on evangelist Tony Alamo's orders must pay $3 million in restitution, a federal judge ruled Thursday.
ExxonMobil appeals $150 million judgment given to Md. families whose wells were contaminatedOctober 9th, 2009 ExxonMobil appeals judgment in Md. leak caseTOWSON, Md.
Joe Frazier has to take his casino fight to tribal court, NY federal appeals court rulesOctober 8th, 2009 Court in NY: Joe Frazier can't sue tribe hereNEW YORK — A federal appeals court ruled Thursday that former heavyweight boxing champion Joe Frazier cannot sue the Oneida Indian Nation over the use of his picture to promote a fight at a casino because of the tribe's sovereign status. The 2nd U.S.
Mass. court upholds $2M award to Wal-Mart pharmacist who claimed male co-workers got more payOctober 5th, 2009 Court upholds $2M award to Wal-Mart pharmacistBOSTON — A former pharmacist at Wal-Mart Stores Inc. who claimed she was fired after asking to be paid the same as her male colleagues is entitled to $2 million in damages awarded by a jury, the state's highest court ruled Monday.
Supreme Court to decide if federal medical officials can be sued for damagesSeptember 30th, 2009 Court to decide if feds liable for cancer mistakeWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court will decide whether the family of a now-deceased immigrant who was denied medical care for cancer while in custody can sue federal medical officials for damages. The case could have far-reaching implications for doctors, nurses and other medical personnel working for governments.
Judge denies temporary restraining order Wyeth sought to block rival's generic antibioticSeptember 24th, 2009 Wyeth denied order to block rival's generic drugTRENTON, N.J. — A federal judge on Thursday rejected drugmaker Wyeth's request for a temporary restraining order to block a rival from selling a generic version of a lucrative Wyeth antibiotic.
Judge: Okla. can't pursue damages against Ark. poultry firms in pollution lawsuitJuly 23rd, 2009 Judge: Okla. can't seek damages in poultry suitTULSA, Okla.
Appeals court in Va. orders new arguments in case of Sept. 11 conspirator MoussaouiJuly 14th, 2009 New arguments ordered in 9/11 conspirator's caseRICHMOND, Va. — A federal appeals court ordered new arguments Tuesday in the case of Sept.
Exxon says it won't appeal, will pay $470M interest on Valdez oil spill punitive damagesJune 30th, 2009 Exxon to pay interest on Valdez oil spill damagesANCHORAGE, Alaska — Oil giant Exxon Mobil Corp. has decided not to appeal hundreds of millions of dollars in interest on punitive damages resulting from the 1989 Exxon Valdez oil spill.
High court rules for injured seaman in dispute with ship owner; OK to sue for punitive damagesJune 25th, 2009 Court rules for seaman in dispute with ship ownerWASHINGTON — The Supreme Court has ruled that seamen injured on the job may sue for punitive damages when employers refuse to pay for medical care and time off. The court, by a 5-4 vote Thursday, decided in favor of Edgar L.
Federal court orders Exxon to pay $500 million in interest on settlement for 1989 oil spillJune 16th, 2009 Exxon told to pay interest on Alaska spill awardANCHORAGE, Alaska — Exxon Mobil Corp. was ordered Monday to pay about $500 million in interest on punitive damages for the Exxon Valdez oil spill off Alaska, nearly doubling the payout to Alaska Natives, fishermen, business owners and others harmed by the 1989 disaster.
Federal court orders Exxon Mobil to pay $507.5 million, plus interest, for 1989 oil spillJune 15th, 2009 Exxon ordered to pay $507.5M for 1989 Alaska spillSAN FRANCISCO — Exxon Mobil Corp. has been ordered to pay $507.5 million in punitive damages to Alaska natives, fishermen, business owners and others harmed by the massive 1989 oil spill off Alaska.
Appeals panel throws out class action status in age discrimination lawsuit against 3MApril 28th, 2009 Appeals panel: Court erred in 3M age bias caseST. PAUL, Minn. — The Minnesota Court of Appeals says a trial court erred when it granted class action status to an age discrimination lawsuit against 3M Co.