AP sources: Commander frets over Afghan corruption
WASHINGTON — Rampant government corruption may derail the fight against the Taliban and al-Qaida in Afghanistan even if as many as 80,000 additional U.S. troops are sent to the war, the top military commander there has concluded, according to U.S. officials briefed on his recommendations.
The conclusion by Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal is part of a still-secret document that requests more troops even as he warns that they ultimately may not prevent terrorists from turning Afghanistan back into a haven.
McChrystal has outlined three options for additional troops — from as many as 80,000 to as few as 10,000 to 15,000, according to officials at the Pentagon and White House.
Each option carries a high risk of failing, according to U.S. officials, although they said McChrystal concluded that fewer troops will bring the highest risks.
McChrystal favors a compromise of 40,000 additional troops, said the officials, who described his request to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss it publicly.
President Barack Obama said Tuesday that he will decide on a war strategy and the troops needed to carry it out in “the coming weeks.” Though he said weighing military and security concerns are key parts of his decision, “another element is making sure we’re doing a good job in building capacity on the civilian side.”
“Our principal goal remains: Root out al-Qaida and its extremist allies that can launch attacks against the United States or its allies,” the president said.
There are 67,000 American troops in Afghanistan, and 1,000 more are headed there by the end of December.
Allegations of widespread fraud in Afghanistan’s Aug. 20 presidential election threaten to scuttle the international strategy to combat the burgeoning Taliban insurgency. The elections were marred by claims of ballot box stuffing and voter coercion.
On Tuesday, one U.S. military official said discussions within the Obama administration are ongoing about whether it is even possible to “surge” enough troops to overcome the corruption and how crucial a legitimate government in Afghanistan is to the overall war strategy. The official requested anonymity to describe the confidential discussions.
A decision on whether to hold a runoff election between Afghanistan President Hamid Karzai and chief challenger Abdullah Abdullah, a former Afghan foreign minister, could come as early as Saturday.
Corruption can lead to citizens rejecting their government and, in some cases, aligning with rebel or insurgent groups. That in turn creates chaos that can lead to security problems and long-term instability.
Sending in additional troops would help secure Afghanistan, but only in the short term, said Jay Parker, a Georgetown University foreign service professor and retired Army colonel. Troops alone can’t fix the corruption, the root of the problem, he said.
Now in its ninth year, the war in Afghanistan has been increasingly deadly for NATO forces and faces waning public support in the United States and allied nations. Obama has vowed to disrupt al-Qaida, the terrorist group behind the Sept. 11 attacks, whose leaders are believed to be hiding in Pakistan’s mountainous border region with Afghanistan.
Some of Obama’s top advisers, chief among them Vice President Joe Biden, want to target al-Qaida with missile-carrying unmanned spy planes and U.S. special forces strikes in Pakistan. But military officials and some diplomats argue that U.S. troops must continue to curb the extremist Taliban’s influence in Afghanistan to prevent future alliances with al-Qaida.
McChrystal last month delivered his request for troops to top military leaders who handed it off to Defense Secretary Robert Gates. Gates gave it to Obama days later.
The additional forces would not be deployed until early next year at the soonest, and it is not clear how they would be compiled. Two U.S. officials cited a range of sending between four and eight military brigades, which would mean a mix of Army and Marine units.
An Army brigade generally has between 3,500 and 5,000 soldiers, while a Marine expeditionary brigade could be built up to about 17,000 troops. However, sending a high number of forces would put more stress on troops who are already stretched thin from fighting in Afghanistan and Iraq, and likely would reduce the time they would get at home between deployments.
Associated Press writer Julie Pace contributed to this report.
(This version CORRECTS that the war is now in its ninth year.)
Related News
AP sources: Afghan commander concerned corruption could derail US, NATO missionOctober 13th, 2009 AP sources: Afghan commander frets over corruptionWASHINGTON — Rampant government corruption may derail the fight against the Taliban and al-Qaida in Afghanistan even if as many as 80,000 additional U.S. troops are sent to the war, the top military commander there has concluded, according to U.S.
NATO chief: weak support from US allies in Afghanistan risks gutting trans-Atlantic relationsOctober 7th, 2009 NATO chief: US allies must do more in AfghanistanBRUSSELS — America's allies risk eroding NATO's trans-Altantic defense pact if they do not contribute more to the Afghan mission, Anders Fogh Rasmussen, the alliance secretary general, said Wednesday. Fogh Rasmussen said there must be a "fair balance" between what the United States does to stabilize Afghanistan and what its allies do, but that Washington currently sees no such balance.
US commander in Afghanistan says success against the Taliban cannot be taken for grantedOctober 1st, 2009 US general says Afghan violence increasingLONDON — The top U.S. and NATO commander in Afghanistan says success there will take time, patience and resolve.
NATO: 2 NATO service members, 1 from the US, killed in AfghanistanSeptember 11th, 2009 NATO: 2 service members killed in AfghanistanKABUL — NATO says two of its troops have been killed in eastern Afghanistan. NATO said a U.S.
Polish soldier killed, five wounded in AfghanistanSeptember 4th, 2009 WARSAW - One Polish soldier was killed and five others were wounded Friday after a bomb exploded near a Polish convoy in eastern Afghanistan, local media reported. This was the 11th Polish soldier to die in the NATO mission, and the first to die in a KTO Rosomak (Wolverine) armoured vehicle.
Pentagon, NATO receive assessment by Gen. McChrystal of strategy in AfghanistanAugust 31st, 2009 NATO gets report of top commander in AfghanistanBRUSSELS — The strategic review of the war in Afghanistan prepared by the top commander of U.S. and NATO forces there has been received by commands on both sides of the ocean, officials in Brussels said Monday.
US commander in Afghanistan sends strategic war review to Pentagon, NATOAugust 31st, 2009 US general sends Afghan war review to PentagonKABUL — NATO says the top commander of U.S. and NATO troops in Afghanistan has finished his 60-day strategic review of the war and that it is now being sent up the chain of command to the Pentagon and NATO headquarters.
NATO chief says Afghanistan mission to last 'as long as it takes'August 28th, 2009 NATO chief: mission to last 'as long as it takes'ANKARA, Turkey — NATO's mission in Afghanistan will last "as long as it takes" to ensure that the country is secure, the alliance's new leader said Friday during a visit to the Turkish capital. Thanks in part to an increase in the number of troops, the mission is making a difference in the war-ravaged and poverty stricken country, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen said.
New NATO secretary-general Fogh Rasmussen chairs meeting on AfghanistanAugust 4th, 2009 New NATO chief chairs 1st meeting on AfghanistanBRUSSELS — NATO's new civilian and military leaders briefed top members Tuesday on command changes in Afghanistan and other matters affecting the escalating war, a spokesman said. Both NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and supreme allied commander U.S.
New NATO secretary-general chairs meeting on AfghanistanAugust 4th, 2009 New NATO chief chairs meeting on AfghanistanBRUSSELS — NATO's new civilian and military leaders are briefing members of the alliance's decision-making North Atlantic Council on recent command changes in Afghanistan and other matters affecting the war. NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and supreme allied commander U.S.
US: 4 US troops die in Afghanistan; British jet crashesJuly 20th, 2009 US: 4 US troops die in AfghanistanKABUL — NATO says four more Americans have been killed in Afghanistan, making July the deadliest month ever for U.S. troops in this war.
Help Afghan police, NATO chief urges membersJune 12th, 2009 BRUSSELS - NATO members states must give the Afghan police more training and better equipment to help them fight off insurgent attacks, the alliance's top official said Friday. Two-thirds of all the uniformed personnel killed in Afghanistan are police officers, and there is an "urgent need to provide them with better training, infrastructure and equipment", NATO Secretary General Jaap de Hoop Scheffer told alliance defence ministers.
Senate unanimously approves nominations of new US commanders for Afghanistan and NATOJune 11th, 2009 Senate confirms commanders for Afghanistan, NATOWASHINGTON — The Senate on Wednesday confirmed the nominations of Army Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal to be the next commander of U.S.
Senate panel votes to approve nominations of new US commanders for Afghanistan and NATOJune 10th, 2009 Panel OKs new commanders for Afghanistan and NATOWASHINGTON — A Senate panel on Tuesday approved the nominations of Army Lt. Gen. Stanley McChrystal to be the next commander of U.S.
US replacing top commander in AfghanistanMay 12th, 2009 WASHINGTON - US Defence Secretary Robert Gates announced Monday that he is replacing the commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan to bring a fresh approach to the conflict. Gates told reporters at the Pentagon he has asked General David McKiernan to submit his resignation and nominated Lieutenant General Stanley McChrystal to become the next commander.