NEW DELHI - Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL) told the Supreme Court Thursday that Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) had the full marketing freedom for Krishna-Godavari gas and accused it of influencing oil ministry officials in getting the price hiked for state-run NTPC.
The company also sought to drive home the point that the government’s contract with RIL was to share the production of gas from Krishna-Godavari basin with the option to take such a share either in cash or kind.
“NTPC floated an international tender and because RIL bid for $2.34 per unit, it won the contract. Then it persuaded some corrupt secretary in the ministry to raise it,” RNRL counsel Ram Jethmalani said.
“This makes nonsense of the whole bidding process — another saga of corruption,” the counsel told the three-member bench of Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, Justice B. Sudershan Reddy and Justice P. Sathasivam.
“When a price has been discovered through a transparent bidding process, nothing further needs to be done, there is no need for the government to intervene,” he said.
The court is hearing the dispute over the supply of 28 million units of gas for 17 years at $2.34 per unit to Anil Ambani-led RNRL from the gas fields off the Andhra Pradesh coast, awarded to Mukesh Ambani’s RIL.
The price, tenure and quantity were based on a family re-organisation pact of 2005, but RIL subsequently said it could only sell the gas for $4.20 per unit, as this was the price, the company claimed, fixed by the government.
During his arguments, Jethmalani also refuted the oil ministry’s contention that it was entitled to approve or disapprove the price of gas between two private parties, using public interest as a reason.
“Today, the law is that the state is not entitled to exercise even its contractual agreement in an arbitrary manner, he said, adding: “Nothing is relevant, if the terms of the contract is clear.
The RNRL counsel also sought to draw the court’s attention to finer nuances of the contract between the government and RIL and said the same was to share production and not revenues.
Thus, he added, valuation had nothing to do with the price of gas and the oil ministry had the option of either taking the proceeds in cash or kind after notifying the contractor — which, in this case, is RIL.
Jethmalani also added an emotional touch to his arguments and told the court: “See, what the younger brother is asking from the elder brother — an amount less than 0.1 percent of the wealth.”
He elaborated further adding that RIL was left with exploration rights of 400,000 sq km of territorial waters along various coastal states, while the area of the disputed Krishna-Godavari basin is merely 7,000 sq km.
The RNRL counsel said the younger Ambani sibling has been left fighting for his share of 28 million units per day, while the older Mukesh has got a find of 120 million units a day in various wells.
He went on to add that the higher price of gas, as being sought by RIL, will seek to further enrich the already profitable company by a windfall additional profit of Rs.50,000 crore at the cost of the common man who will end up paying a higher price for power.
Earlier, minutes before Additional Solicitor General Vivek Tankha was to wind up his argument on behalf of the oil ministry, Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium sought to contradict the perception that the government has jettisoned NTPC’s interest in its legal battle with RIL.
“The government in its application has clarified that it has not jettisoned the interest of NTPC. The NTPC suit in the Bombay High Court, seeking supply of gas at $2.34 per unit, should not be prejudiced in any manner,” said Subramanium.
Responding to the solicitor general’s statement, RIL counsel Harish Salve said that if NTPC proved it has a concluded contract for the gas supply, “I am bound to supply the gas at whatever price”.
RNRL counsel Mukul Rohatgi reacted, saying: “I know the solicitor general is a fair person. Till he made the statement, it was the perception that the government believes the price of $2.34 is suspect.”
Related News
RNRL's conditional nod for oil ministry as party in gas disputeNovember 19th, 2009 NEW DELHI - Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL) Thursday gave its consent in the Supreme Court to the oil ministry becoming a party in the dispute over supply of gas from Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) but without giving up the right to cross-examine its officials. RNRL counsel Ram Jethmalani gave the consent when Solicitor General Gopal Subramanium, appearing for the ministry, sought to remove the perception that "the government was jettisoning" state-run power utility NTPC's interest in another lawsuit with RIL.
RIL can't enter private pacts for gas supply: Oil ministryNovember 18th, 2009 NEW DELHI - The oil ministry Wednesday asserted before the Supreme Court that the government's production-sharing contract with the Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) bars the company from private arrangements to supply gas. The government has exclusive rights over all minerals underlying the ocean and in the country's territorial waters, Additional Solicitor General Mohan Parasaran, appearing for the oil ministry, told the three-member bench of the apex court.
Oil ministry claims burden will be heavy if gas sold as per family pactNovember 18th, 2009 NEW DELHI - The oil ministry argued in the Supreme Court Wednesday that the government would face a heavy burden if natural gas was supplied to Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL) by Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) based on a family pact. "The private arrangement envisages distribution of natural gas among the two parties for present and future reserves in the Krishna-Godavari basin as well as new discoveries in perpetuity," said Additional Solicitor General Vivek Tankha.
Court can't impose family pact on shareholders: RILNovember 17th, 2009 NEW DELHI - Mukesh Ambani-led Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) Tuesday argued before the Supreme Court that the judiciary cannot impose a private family pact between a company's promoters on its shareholders. "The court has to act as an umpire rather than as a bowler or as a fielder, Rohington Nariman, counsel for RIL, told a three-member bench of the apex court that is hearing the Krishna-Godavari gas dispute.
RNRL objects to oil ministry being party to gas disputeNovember 17th, 2009 NEW DELHI - Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL) Tuesday opposed the oil ministry's plea to the Supreme Court to join the Krishna-Godavari gas dispute as a party and said cross-examination of officials must be allowed if the request is granted. RNRL counsel Ram Jethmalani, who began his arguments on the lawsuit before a three-judge bench, also questioned the maintainability of the special leave petition filed by the oil ministry and said it was against the rules.
RIL offers to withdraw affidavits of directors on Ambani pactNovember 13th, 2009 NEW DELHI - Reliance Industries Ltd Friday made a conditional offer in the Supreme Court to withdraw the affidavits of seven directors who claimed no knowledge of the contents of a family pact between the two Ambani brothers. Arguing before a three-month bench hearing the Krishna-Godavari gas dispute, RIL counsel Harish Salve made the offer if Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL) deletes a paragraph from its petition, or averment, that the directors had approved and acted on the family pact.
Didn't Mukesh know of Ambani family pact, asks apex courtNovember 12th, 2009 NEW DELHI - Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) can't say it had no knowledge of the Ambani family pact between brothers Mukesh and Anil, which was brokered by their mother Kokilaben, the Supreme Court observed Thursday. "Mukesh Ambani had a copy of the MOU (memorandum of understanding, or the family business reorganisation pact)," asked the three-member apex court bench of Chief Justice K.G.
Didn't Mukesh know of Ambani family pact, queries apex courtNovember 12th, 2009 NEW DELHI - Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL) can't say it had no knowledge of the Ambani family pact between brothers Mukesh and Anil, which was brokered by their mother Kokilaben, the Supreme Court observed Thursday. As arguments continued on the Krishna-Godavari gas dispute, Ram Jethmalani, counsel for Anil Ambani's Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL), wanted to question seven directors of RIL whose affidavits claim they had no knowledge of the contents of the family pact.
Government's stand in gas row dishonest: Anil Ambani GroupNovember 10th, 2009 NEW DELHI - The Anil Ambani group Tuesday opposed a move initiated by the government to become a party to the dispute over natural gas with Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries and termed the attempt "dishonest and collusive". "Reliance Natural Resources objects to the leave to appeal to be granted to the ministry of petroleum and natural gas," the group said in an affidavit filed in the Supreme Court to counter the government's petition.
Sri Lankan trade unions protest delay in pay hikeNovember 10th, 2009 COLOMBO - Sri Lankan trade unions Tuesday decided to go ahead with their planned three-day strike to protest against the delay in pay hike. The trade unions of port, fuel, electricity and water sectors have jointly called for the strike despite government's promise to raise the salaries of workers, Xinhua reported.
Oil ministry's stand on gas row dishonest: RNRL (Second Lead)November 10th, 2009 NEW DELHI - Anil Ambani-led Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL) Tuesday opposed a move initiated by the oil ministry to become a party to the dispute over natural gas with Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries and termed the attempt "dishonest and collusive". "Reliance Natural Resources objects to the leave to appeal to be granted to the ministry of petroleum and natural gas," the group said in an affidavit filed in the Supreme Court to counter the government's petition.
Supreme Court to hear Ambani case againNovember 5th, 2009 NEW DELHI - The court battle between the Ambani brothers will begin afresh today, after two judges of the Supreme Court rescued themselves from two separate cases on Wednesday, citing possible conflict of interest. Justice B Sudarshan Reddy has replaced Justice Raveendran.
Anil Ambani group says oil ministry favouring Reliance IndustriesOctober 28th, 2009 NEW DELHI - Anil Ambani-led Reliance Natural Resources Wednesday told the Supreme Court that the oil ministry was siding with Mukesh Ambani's Reliance Industries to scuttle their pact for natural gas from the Krishna-Godavari basin at $2.34 per unit. The allegation was made by Ram Jethmalani, senior counsel for Reliance Natural, before a three-member bench of the apex court headed by Chief Justice K.G.
SC asks Ambanis to settle gas row through 'suitable arrangement'October 21st, 2009 NEW DELHI - The Supreme Court on Wednesday asked why the Ambani brothers cannot settle their gas supply row through a "suitable arrangement."
During a hearing of the dispute over supply of gas by RIL to RNRL at 2.34 dollars per mmBtu, the bench headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan said the two parties could arrive at a "suitable arrangement" through arbitration. The case between Reliance Industries, headed by Mukesh, and the Reliance Natural Resources Ltd, led by Anil, is over a deal to sell gas from the Krishna Basin Reserve to the Reliance Natural Resource Limited (RNRL) at below-market rates as per a family settlement.
Reliance Industries bound to supply gas to us: Anil Ambani firmSeptember 9th, 2009 NEW DELHI - Anil Ambani group firm Reliance Natural Resources Ltd (RNRL) Wednesday told the Supreme Court that Reliance Industries Ltd (RIL), belonging to elder brother Mukesh Ambani, was under a binding obligation to supply gas to it. In an affidavit filed in the apex court registry, RNRL also contended that the government had no role to play either in the utilisation or the fixing of gas price as per its contract with RIL.