I am very annoyed when people decides to abuse some contextually correct phrase to try to justify something stupid.我很恼火当人们决定将滥用的一些内容正确的短语，设法自圆其说一些愚蠢的。


We do offer Struts developers a choice, but, hey, choice is good.我们提供的Struts开发一个选择，但是，嘿，选择是好的。 ： ）

People who want to create and maintain Struts Classic are welcome to do so.人谁不想创造和保持Struts的经典欢迎这样做。

People who want to create and maintain Struts Shale are equally welcome.人谁不想创造和保持Struts的页岩也同样欢迎。

Source: http://www.apachenews.org/archives/000552.html 资料来源： http://www.apachenews.org/archives/000552.html

Right on Sir!有权对主席先生！ Choice is good.选择是好的。 So offer hundreds of Open Source choices each of which are architecturally short-sighted (reflecting badly on the designers) and/or poorly implemented and force the user to plough through them wasting hundreds of hours or till he loses his sanity.因此，提供数以百计的开放源代码的选择，其中每建筑是短视的（反映不良影响的设计者）和/或不佳的实施，并迫使用户投入，通过他们浪费了好几百个小时，或直至他失去了理智。 Look at the choices for Open Sores CMS.看看在选择开放性溃疡细胞质雄性不育。 There are over hundreds of them.有超过数百人。 Who needs hundreds of equally inane choices (with few good ones) and with no objective analysis lying around?谁需要数百名同样inane选择（与几个好的） ，并没有客观的分析，倒卧在靠近？ Same with Java Frameworks (yeah, everyone thinks he can design his own framework and sourceforge and apache are always eager to help them) and scripting languages.同时与Java框架（是啊，大家都认为他可以设计自己的框架和SourceForge和阿帕奇总是热衷于帮助他们）和脚本语言。
I am not singling out struts here.我不是挑出来的Struts在这里。 In fact struts is a decent framework though shortsighted and complicated.事实上， Struts的是一个体面的框架内，虽然是短视的和复杂性。

Choice is good but in moderation.选择是好的，但在放缓。 Anything in excess is bad including choice.任何在过剩是不好的，包括选择。 You are forcing yet another choice on the user without any justification and without admitting your failures with struts experiment.你是强迫的又一选择，对用户没有任何理由和没有承认你的失败与Struts的实验。

As a volunteer organization, we are not constrained by the economics of competition.作为一个志愿组织，我们不会限制经济的竞争。 All we need are volunteers who are ready, willing, and able to do the work.所有我们需要的是义工，谁是准备，愿意，而且能够做这项工作。 So long as we have volunteers, we have work for them to do.因此，只要我们有志愿者，我们已为他们工作做的。 ： ）

Right on Sir again!有权对主席先生再次！ Sure volunteers are infinite in number and so competition doesn’t exist!肯定是无限的志愿人员在数量和竞争，所以不存在！ That not being the reality why don’t you admit that you are effectively shelving struts for good.这不是现实，你为什么不承认你是有效地搁置Struts的为好。 And would you Sir please come out with the proper reasons like very painful to use and manage, steep learning curve, short-sighted in handling complex web sites, tries to do too many things at once etc.和你会主席先生，请出来与正当理由一样，是很痛苦的使用和管理，陡峭的学习曲线，短视的，在处理复杂的网站，尝试做的东西太多了一次等。

I hope Groovy will get a reality-check soon or it will join the same league!我希望Groovy是会得到一个现实检查或尽快将加入相同的联赛！