Why Microsoft Vista is Bad & BadVista Good (But FSF Bad) �Ȃ��}�C�N���\�t�gVista�������� badvista�ǂ��i�������A FSF�̈����j
I morally support BadVista campaign in as much as it helps educate people that:�����I�ɃL�����y�[�����T�|�[�gbadvista���Ƃ��Ăł��邾�������̐l�X�����炷��̂ɖ𗧂��܂��F
1. 1 �B Windows Vista is actually a downgrade (from Windows XP or Windows 2000) wherein you are forced to support DRM (for content producers) at your expense (CPU & Memory) forcing you to upgrade your hardware just to get reasonable performance out of Windows Vista ( Windows Vista�ɂ́A���ۂɂ̓_�E���O���[�h�i Windows XP�܂���Windows 2000 �j���T�|�[�g����DRM���������Ȃ��������i�R���e���c����j�����Ĕ�p���i CPU ���������j�ւ̃A�b�v�O���[�h���������Ă���n�[�h�E�F�A�����鍇���I�Ȑ��\����o����Windows Vista �i cost analysis�������� ). �j �B
2. 2 �B Microsoft Vista software is not owned by you even after you buy it.�}�C�N���\�t�g���B�X�^�ł͂Ȃ��\�t�g�E�F�A���w���ɏ��L����Ă��܂��B You enjoy only a restricted license to use the software.���y���݂݂̂��g�p���ă\�t�g�E�F�A�̃��C�Z���X�𐧌����܂��B You are literally at the mercy of Microsoft.���Ȃ��������ʂ�́A���߂̐��i�ł��B
3. 3 �B Microsoft Vista operating system doesn't provide significant improvement over Windows XP to even think about upgrading.�}�C�N���\�t�gVista�I�y���[�e�B���O�V�X�e����啝�ɉ�P����Ȃ�Windows XP�̒��l���Ă��A�b�v�O���[�h���܂��B
4. 4 �B Linux today Linux�̍��� presents a�v���[���g���� much more compelling case�͂邩�ɐ����͂̂���P�[�X as all-round operating system over Windows Vista and even Windows XP and should be strongly considered as the first choice operating system and also for (upgrade)�I�[�����E���h�̃I�y���[�e�B���O�V�X�e���Ƃ��Ĉȏ�A Windows XP�����Windows Vista�Ƃ����Ȃ����K�v�������I�y���[�e�B���O�V�X�e���Ƃ̍ŏ��̑I�������i�A�b�v�O���[�h�j migration�ڍs .�ł��B
However I do not support FSF (or Richard Stallman) for its hardcore stance against commercial software, which I personally think preaches a thinly veiled communist agenda; but that is a topic for another day.�����������T�|�[�g���Ă��Ȃ���FSF �i�܂��́A���`���[�h�X�g�[���}���j�̃n�[�h�R�A�̏��p�\�t�g�E�F�A�ɔ��̗�����l���鎄�͌l�I�ɔ��������ċ��Y��`�̐������c��;�������A�ʂ̓�ɂ́A�g�s�b�N���Q�Ƃ��Ă��������B So I think linking BadVista campaign with FSF (to support BadVista campaign you have to join FSF which I refuse to do) is a bad move.����Ǝv��badvista�L�����y�[����FSF�̃����N�i badvista���T�|�[�g����L�����y�[���ɎQ������K�v��������s����FSF�̂��������ۂ��� �j�́A�s�ǂɈړ����܂��B I support BadVista campaign but not FSF.���̃T�|�[�gbadvista FSF�̃L�����y�[���͂ł��܂���B
Filed under��o����� Computer Security�R���s���[�^�Z�L�����e�B , �A Enterprise Software�G���^�[�v���C�Y�\�t�g�E�F�A , �A Fedora 7 7�\�t�g�X , �A Fedora Core 6 Fedora Core��6 , �A Headline News�j���[�X�̌��o�� , �A Linux���i�b�N�X , �A Linux Migration Linux�ւ̈ڍs , �A Microsoft�}�C�N���\�t�g , �A Open Source Software�I�[�v���\�[�X�̃\�t�g�E�F�A , �A Vista�r�X�^ , �A Windows Windows�� | |
| |
RSS 2.0 RSS 2.0�� | |
Trackback�g���b�N�o�b�N this Article |���̋L��|
Email this Article�d�q���[�����̋L��
You may also like to read��ǂނ悤�ɂ��邱�Ƃ��\ |





































September 14th, 2007 at 1:48 pm 2007�N9��14���1:48 pm��
I also disagree with some of Richard Stallman�fs absolutist position, but to call it a �gthinly veiled communist agenda�h is beneath idiocy.�����٘_�����邢�����̃��`���[�h�X�g�[���}���̐ꐧ��`�̈ʒu�A���������Ăяo���ɂ�"���������ċ��Y��`�̃A�W�F���_"�͔��s�̉��ɂ��܂��B His ideas of freedom are the polar opposite of communism�fs state control.�ނ̃A�C�f�A�̎��R�́A�����̋��Y��`�̏�Ԃ𐧌䂵�܂��B
September 16th, 2007 at 8:39 pm 2007�N9��16��͌ߌ�8��39��
Actually they aren�ft much different.���ۂɔނ�͂��܂�ς��Ȃ��B Communism wants equality for all and undermines individual enterprise in favor of state.���Y��`�͕����Ȃ��̂��ׂĂ̌X�̊�ƂɗL���ȏ�ԂɂȂ�܂��B
Richard actively propagates against profit-making corporations and hopes that all software will eventually be free.���`���[�h��ϋɓI�ɓ`�d����c����ƂƊ�҂��čŏI�I�ɂ��ׂẴ\�t�g�E�F�A�͖����ł��B Unfortunately Richard has enough of nest egg to last him a lifetime, most of us don�ft.�c�O�Ȃ��烊�`���[�h�̑��ɗ����Ō�ɂ͏\���Ȕނ͐��U�A�قƂ�ǂ̖₢���킹�͂���܂���B
Both of them are against individual entrepreneurship and drive.�����ɔ��̗���̌X�̋N�ƉƂ�h���C�u�ɑ}��܂��B Communism wants to achieve equality by sharing the wealth by force.���Y��`�̕�����B�����邽�߂ɖ]��ŕx�������I�ɋ��L���Ă��܂��B Richard believes only in free software which in turn forces corporations out of business and can achieve equality of poor people globally.���`���[�h�́A�t���[�\�t�g�E�F�A�����ŃA�E�g�ɂȂ��Ƃ̃r�W�l�X��R�́A���E�̕n�����l�X�̕�����B�����邽�߂ł��B
Both of the mindset forgets that human beings will by nature strive to be different ..�Y��邱�Ƃ̗���̐l�Ԃ̍l����́A���R�ɓw�͂������قȂ�.. to be better than others, that is what drives them forward everyday.���̑��ȏ�ɁA����͂ǂ̂悤�ȃh���C�u���Đi�ޖ���ł��B
From where I am standing both ideas share the same fundamental flaw.�ǂ�����A�C�f�B�A�����L���Ď��͗����ė���̍��{�I�Ȍ��ׂƓ����ł��B Forced equality can never be a solution.�����I�����ɂ͐�ɂ���\�����[�V�����ł��B
Think about it.�l�������Ă��������B If the above is not clear enough I can write a more detailed explanation in a separate blog post.��L�̏ꍇ�́A�\���ɖ��炩�ł͂���܂��͂����ɂ���ɏڂ���������ʂ̃u���O�ɓ��e���܂��B
September 17th, 2007 at 1:52 pm 2007�N9��17���1:52 pm��
What I think you are missing is that there is no controlling state running the free software movement and stifling individual initiative by imposing decisions from above.���Ȃ����s��s���Ǝv�����ǂ̂悤�Ȃ��Ƃ��Ȃ���Ԃ̐�������s���Ă���t���[�\�t�g�E�F�A�^���Ƒ����l�܂�悤�X�̃C�j�V�A�`�u���ォ��̑s��Ȉӎv���肵�܂��B The phenomenal success of free and open source software clearly shows that there is a dynamic operating outside your conception of free market versus state.�̋��ٓI�Ȑ������ŁA�I�[�v���\�[�X�\�t�g�E�F�A�����݂��邱�Ƃ��͂�����Ǝ����Ă���I�y���[�e�B���O�O���_�C�i�~�b�N�Ȏ��R�s��̍\�z�����đΏ�Ԃł��B There is also a lot of money being made off of open source; it requires a different business model.�܂��A��������̂������I�t�����A�I�[�v���\�[�X�̂�Ă��邱�Ƃɂ́A�ʂ̃r�W�l�X���f���ł��B I currently make a comfortable living showing businesses how to cut costs with open source DBRMSs.���͌��ݕ\�����̊�Ƃɉ��K�Ȑ�������팸�����@�ɂ��Ă̓I�[�v���\�[�X��dbrmss�ł��B
Also, take into account that RMS is an ideological extreme.�܂��A����l���l���ɓ��邱�Ƃ́A�ɒ[�Ȏv�z�ł��B I think most people would agree that there is room for both open source and private business.�Ǝv���قƂ�ǂ̐l�����ӂ��A�I�[�v���\�[�X�̗���̗]�n������Ɩ��Ԋ�Ƃł��B
February 29th, 2008 at 6:45 am 2008�N2��29��͌ߑO6��45��
> I think most people would agree that there is room for both open source and private business. >�Ǝv���قƂ�ǂ̐l�����ӂ��A�I�[�v���\�[�X�̗���̗]�n������Ɩ��Ԋ�Ƃł��B
I agree with that position.���̗���ɓ��ӂ��܂��B
> What I think you are missing is that there is no controlling state running the free software movement and stifling individual initiative by imposing decisions from above. >�ǂ̂悤�ȂƎv�������Ȃ����s��s���̏�Ԃ��Ȃ����Ƃ����s���Ă���t���[�\�t�g�E�F�A�^���𐧌䂷��Ƒ����l�܂�悤�X�̃C�j�V�A�`�u���ォ��̑s��Ȉӎv���肵�܂��B
A state is created when a significant mass of people starts following the directives from a single source or group.��Ԃ��쐬������ʂ̐l�X�ɏd�v�Ȏ��̃f�B���N�e�B�u���N���܂��̓O���[�v��1�̃\�[�X����ł��B Communism wasn�ft initially linked with power either.���Y��`�́A�ŏ��Ɍ��т��Ă��Ȃ��d���̂ǂ��炩�ł��B They were the opporessed ones before they became the oppressor.�ނ�͑O�ɂȂ����̔��Q��opporessed���̂ł��B