I was intrigued by the fact that a new scripting language was designed for JavaFX, a new technology based on the Java platform, designed to enable consistent user experiences on desktop, mobile, TV, and other consumer platforms, where existing languages like Javascript or Groovy could be embraced and extended instead.我當時推出的事實，即一個新的腳本語言，是專為javafx ，新技術的基礎上， Java平台，旨在使一致的用戶體驗，對台式機，筆記本電腦，電視及其他消費平台，現有的語言像JavaScript或溝槽可以擁抱和擴展。 A new language means a learning curve for a developer to get proficient at and also not be able to leverage the developer base of an existing popular language like Javascript or Gorrvy.一種新的語言是指的學習曲線發展，以獲得在精通，也無法槓桿發展的基礎上現有流行的語言一樣， JavaScript或gorrvy 。 I asked the question to the powers that be at Sun.我問的問題，向權力在陽光。

JavaFX team lead revealed that the decision behind creating a new language was more political than anything else. javafx隊率先透露，這一決定的背後，創造一種新的語言是更多的政治比任何事情都重要。 He anticipated community resistance if they tried to embrace and extend any existing scripting languages based on past experiences.他預期，社會的阻力，如果他們試圖擁抱和擴展任何現有的腳本語言，根據過去的經驗。 He also mentioned that if JavaFX gains enough traction they would be willing to provide libraries for languages like Groovy / Javascript to be able to use instead of JavaFX.他還提到，如果javafx取得足夠的牽引，他們會願意提供圖書館的語言一樣， Groovy是/ JavaScript以能夠使用而不是javafx 。

Update: My opinions at JavaOne has been更新：我的意見，在JavaOne已 quoted by InfoWorld所引用的資訊 . 。 I still stand by that.我仍站在這一點。 I think JavaFX scripting language could have been better implemented by JavaScript or Groovy.我認為javafx腳本語言，可以得到更好的執行JavaScript或溝槽。