Keith posted an interesting article countering the hype generated by Google Suggest & GMail -祁俊文張貼一個有趣的文章反炒作所產生的Google建議＆ Gmail的- Google Suggest and GMail are a step backwards Google建議和Gmail是一種退步

I think there are two things which makes Google Suggest interesting.我認為有兩件事使Google建議有趣。

People now realize there is a way to use javascript for live update of sections in a webpage, which for some strange reason they didn’t find out earlier!人們現在認識到有一種方法使用JavaScript為實時更新的路段在一個網頁，其中一些奇怪的原因，他們沒有找到早前！

And I think the implementation is pretty decent (read fast) in duplicating a client side application functionality in a web application.我認為實施是非常體面（快速閱讀）在複製客戶端的應用功能，在Web應用程序。 And what is so great about it?是什麼使偉大的約呢？

For one it is easy to install (none) and use web applications.一，它很容易安裝（無）和使用Web應用程序。 So more power to web applications, the better it is.因此，更多的權力，以Web應用程序，這是更好的。 People are getting more adjusted to the web paradigm.人們越來越調整到Web範式。 They want to do everything web-based.他們要盡一切基於Web的。 Most of the applications designed today are web based.大部分的應用而設計的今天，是基於Web的。 For advanced interactivity in a web application the choices are limited:先進的互動性在Web應用程序的選擇是有限的：

  • Java Applet Java Applet的
  • Flash閃光
  • Other plugins like SVG其他插件一樣， SVG的
  • Java Server Faces or similar technology Java服務器面臨的或類似技術
  • Java Script Java腳本

Of these Javascript is the least powerful (ugly duckling) and yet most widely available.這些JavaScript是最強大的（醜小鴨） ，但最普遍的。 So any additional capability for the ugly duckling is good overall.因此，任何額外的能力，為醜小鴨，是良好的整體。

And talking about innovation.和談論創新。 Google is definitely innovating. Google是絕對的創新。 You may not like it, it may not be the best, but it surely is raising the bar.你可能不喜歡它，它未必是最好的，但它無疑是提高大律師資格。
At least someone is innovating for a change among the giants!至少有人是創新，為改變之間的巨人！

Interestingly it also shows viability of Java Server Faces like technology, specially with more widespread availability of better bandwidth for consumers.有趣的，也顯示活力的服務器端的Java一樣，面臨著技術，特別是與更廣泛的可用性更好的帶寬為消費者。