The Death of Akismet (WordPress Spam Prevention Plugin)?死亡akismet (防止垃圾郵件的WordPress插件) ?
Akismet is a spam prevention plugin from the WordPress author, Matt Mullenweg. akismet是垃圾郵件預防插件從作者的WordPress ,亞光mullenweg 。 It uses collective wisdom in filtering spams.它使用的集體智慧,在過濾垃圾郵件。 Essentially you, blog owner, help it learn by marking comments as spam.基本上你,博客主人,幫助它了解標記的評論為垃圾郵件。 It then uses the knowledge to filter spams from other blogs and your too.然後,使用知識,以過濾垃圾郵件從其他的博客和您太。 There are two major problems with this approach.有兩個主要的問題,與這種做法。
First it can be tricked.首先,它可以欺騙。 It has been shown that you can mark a legitimate commentator as spam and by repeatedly doing so you ensure that all his future comments are flagged as spam automatically by Akismet.它已經表明,您可以馬克一個合法的評論員為垃圾郵件,並通過反复這樣做,你確保所有的未來,他的評論是標幟為垃圾郵件自動akismet 。 The reverse is also true.反向也是如此。 You can manipulate Akismet to mark your spam comments as legitimate comments by repeatedly (as low as 3-4 times) marking them as non-spam in blogs you control and which uses Akismet.您可以操縱akismet標誌您的垃圾郵件的評論,作為合法的意見,反复(低3-4倍)標記他們作為非垃圾郵件在博客中,您可以控制和使用akismet 。
Secondly Akismet can be deluged with spam to make it useless.其次akismet可以deluged與垃圾郵件,使其形同虛設。
Akismet flags several proper comments as spam (false positives). akismet國旗幾個適當的評論為垃圾郵件(假陽性) 。 It is essential that you sometimes visit the Akismet queue and identify the proper comments and mark them as non-spam.這是十分重要的你有時訪問akismet隊列,並找出適當的評論和馬克他們作為非垃圾郵件。 This helps Akismet “learn”.這有助於akismet “學習” 。 This however fails when Akismet catches hude volume of spam comments.然而,這不,當akismet漁獲hude垃圾郵件數量的意見。 It becomes impossible for humans to manually visit the queue and identify false-positives.它不可能成為人類以手動方式訪問隊列,並確定假陽性。 Not to mention the current incarnation of Akismet displays only 150 comments marked as spam, with no paging capability.不提目前的化身, akismet只顯示150評論標示為垃圾郵件,沒有傳呼能力。
This weekend I received 4378 spams!本週末,我收到了4378垃圾郵件! How can anyone check this volume of spam?如何任何人都可以,請在此垃圾郵件數量? So Akismet stops learning and becomes less useful by the day.因此, akismet停止學習,成為有用的少由天。 Also some poor commentators are destined to languish in the hell of being marked as comment spammers without any hope of reprieve.也有一些窮人評論家注定人在地獄的被標示為垃圾郵件發送者的評論沒有任何希望的緩刑。
In other words spammers can render Akismet useless by simply deluging the site with large volume of spams.在其他的話垃圾郵件發送者可以使akismet無用的,只要deluging網站與大量的垃圾郵件。 And it works.和它的工程。
In the end I think Akismet alone is clearly insufficient solution as advertised.在結束我認為akismet單顯然是不夠的解決辦法,因為廣告。 I am hesitant to use Bad Behavior again based on my last experience where it somehow prevented several people from commenting, including my friends.我很猶豫,使用不良行為再次基礎上我上次的經驗,它在某種程度上阻止幾個人評論,包括我的朋友。
WordPress comment spam is in need of a better solution.在WordPress垃圾評論是在需要有一個更好的解決辦法。
Filed under提起下 CMS Software CMS軟件 , , Headline News頭條新聞 , , Pro Blogging贊成Blogging , , Spam Watch垃圾郵件觀賞 , , Web網頁 , , WordPress在WordPress | |
| |
RSS 2.0 2.0 | |
Trackback Trackback跟踪 this Article |此文章|
Email this Article電子郵件此文章
You may also like to read您也可以想讀 |





May 28th, 2006 at 11:07 pm 2006年5月28日在下午11時07分
Have you tried Spam Karma?您是否嘗試過垃圾郵件的因果報應? It’s quite effective and has less false positives than Akismet.它的相當有效,並已較少假陽性比akismet 。 In fact, never.在事實上,從來沒有。
May 29th, 2006 at 1:10 am 2006年5月29日在上午01時10分
Yes是
May 29th, 2006 at 4:49 pm 2006年5月29日在下午4時49分
Akismet does make mistakes, but is very difficult to poison. akismet是否犯錯,但是非常困難的毒害。 It’s blocking double and triple what it was a few weeks ago with no sweat in the underlying software, so I wouldn’t count it out.它的攔截,雙,三是什麼這是一個在數星期前,沒有汗水在背後的軟件,所以我不會指望它。 (But then again, I’m biased. :)) (但後來再次,我很失之偏頗。 : ) )
May 29th, 2006 at 11:12 pm 2006年5月29日在下午11時12分
Matt,馬特,
Good to see you here.好,在這裡看到你。
I think the core problem is the volume of spam.我認為核心的問題是垃圾郵件數量。 It pretty much prevents anyone from manually checking the Akismet queue.它幾乎可以防止任何人從手動檢查akismet隊列中。 As a result the system, as I understand, cannot benefit from user input.由於該系統,據我所知,不能受惠於用戶輸入。 As of now I have over 8000 spam (hopefully) comments in my Akismet queue.截至目前我已超過8000垃圾郵件(希望)的意見,在我的akismet隊列中。 I have to hope that they are all spam as I cannot manually check them.我希望他們都是垃圾郵件,正如我不能手動檢查。
I do not doubt that you have made a robust system.我不懷疑你作出了強健的系統。 What I am however concerned is the usefullness of the system when it doesn’t get collaborative human input helping its classification.什麼不過,我關心的是usefullness該系統時,它不會合作的人力投入,幫助其分類。
August 16th, 2006 at 11:52 am 2006年8月16日在上午11時52分
Try This試試這個
http://cavemonkey50.com/code/akismet-spam-count/
October 6th, 2006 at 3:15 pm 2006年10月6日下午3時15分
[...] Akismet — one knock [...] [ … … ] akismet -一敲[ … … ]
August 1st, 2007 at 5:57 pm 2007年8月1日在下午5時57分
You are right - no way to check them all but whenever I do review the first page of spam (or crawl through the actual database) I never find false positives.你是正確的-沒有辦法,以檢查他們所有,但每當我做檢討的第一頁上的垃圾郵件(或檢索通過實際的數據庫)我從來沒有發現假陽性。 Once you dig through you’ll find they are actually spam.一旦你挖通過您會發現他們其實是垃圾郵件。 Don’t be fooled by all the “great site, thanks” posts - their goal is to train Akismet into thinking the poster is good and then they have a better chance of getting their spam through.不要被愚弄了所有“偉大的網站,感謝”的職位-他們的目標是訓練a kismet到思想海報是好的,然後他們有一個更好的機會獲得他們的垃圾郵件通過。