The Death of Akismet (WordPress Spam Prevention Plugin)? ����akismet ����ֹ�����ʼ���WordPress����� ��
Akismet is a spam prevention plugin from the WordPress author, Matt Mullenweg. akismet�������ʼ�Ԥ����������ߵ�WordPress ���ǹ�mullenweg �� It uses collective wisdom in filtering spams.��ʹ�õļ����ǻۣ��ڹ��������ʼ��� Essentially you, blog owner, help it learn by marking comments as spam.�����㣬�������ˣ��������˽��ǵ�����Ϊ�����ʼ��� It then uses the knowledge to filter spams from other blogs and your too.Ȼ��ʹ��֪ʶ���Թ��������ʼ�������IJ��ͺ���̫�� There are two major problems with this approach.��������Ҫ�����⣬������������
First it can be tricked.���ȣ��������ƭ�� It has been shown that you can mark a legitimate commentator as spam and by repeatedly doing so you ensure that all his future comments are flagged as spam automatically by Akismet.���Ѿ���������������һ���Ϸ�������ԱΪ�����ʼ�����ͨ������������ȷ�����е�δ������������DZ���Ϊ�����ʼ��Զ�akismet �� The reverse is also true.����Ҳ����ˡ� You can manipulate Akismet to mark your spam comments as legitimate comments by repeatedly (as low as 3-4 times) marking them as non-spam in blogs you control and which uses Akismet.����Բ���akismet��־��������ʼ������ۣ���Ϊ�Ϸ������������3-4�������������Ϊ�������ʼ��ڲ����У�����Կ��ƺ�ʹ��akismet ��
Secondly Akismet can be deluged with spam to make it useless.���akismet����deluged�������ʼ���ʹ����ͬ���衣
Akismet flags several proper comments as spam (false positives). akismet���켸���ʵ�������Ϊ�����ʼ��������ԣ� �� It is essential that you sometimes visit the Akismet queue and identify the proper comments and mark them as non-spam.����ʮ����Ҫ������ʱ����akismet���У����ҳ��ʵ������ۺ����������Ϊ�������ʼ��� This helps Akismet "learn".��������akismet ��ѧϰ�� �� This however fails when Akismet catches hude volume of spam comments.Ȼ���ⲻ����akismet���hude�����ʼ���������� It becomes impossible for humans to manually visit the queue and identify false-positives.����ܳ�Ϊ�������ֶ���ʽ���ʶ��У���ȷ�������ԡ� Not to mention the current incarnation of Akismet displays only 150 comments marked as spam, with no paging capability.����Ŀǰ�Ļ��? akismetֻ��ʾ150���۱�ʾΪ�����ʼ���û�д���������
This weekend I received 4378 spams!����ĩ�����յ���4378�����ʼ��� How can anyone check this volume of spam?����κ��˶����ԣ����ڴ������ʼ������� So Akismet stops learning and becomes less useful by the day.��ˣ� akismetֹͣѧϰ����Ϊ���õ������졣 Also some poor commentators are destined to languish in the hell of being marked as comment spammers without any hope of reprieve.Ҳ��һЩ�������ۼ�ע�����ڵ���ı���ʾΪ�����ʼ������ߵ�����û���κ�ϣ��Ļ��̡�
In other words spammers can render Akismet useless by simply deluging the site with large volume of spams.������Ļ������ʼ������߿���ʹakismet���õģ�ֻҪdeluging��վ������������ʼ��� And it works.����Ĺ��̡�
In the end I think Akismet alone is clearly insufficient solution as advertised.�ڽ�������Ϊakismet����Ȼ�Dz����Ľ���취����Ϊ��档 I am hesitant to use Bad Behavior again based on my last experience where it somehow prevented several people from commenting, including my friends.�Һ���ԥ��ʹ�ò�����Ϊ�ٴλ������ϴεľ��飬����ij�̶ֳ�����ֹ���������ۣ������ҵ����ѡ�
WordPress comment spam is in need of a better solution.��WordPress��������������Ҫ��һ����õĽ���취��
Filed under������ CMS Software CMS��� , �� Headline Newsͷ������ , �� Pro Blogging��Blogging , �� Spam Watch�����ʼ����� , �� Web��ҳ , �� WordPress��WordPress | |
| |
RSS 2.0 2.0 | |
Trackback Trackback���� this Article |������|
Email this Article�����ʼ�������
You may also like to read��Ҳ������� |





































May 28th, 2006 at 11:07 pm 2006��5��28��������11ʱ07��
Have you tried Spam Karma?���Ƿ��Թ������ʼ������Ӧ�� It��s quite effective and has less false positives than Akismet.����൱��Ч�����ѽ��ټ����Ա�akismet �� In fact, never.����ʵ�ϣ�����û�С�
May 29th, 2006 at 1:10 am 2006��5��29��������01ʱ10��
Yes��
May 29th, 2006 at 4:49 pm 2006��5��29��������4ʱ49��
Akismet does make mistakes, but is very difficult to poison. akismet�Ƿ?���Ƿdz����ѵĶ����� It��s blocking double and triple what it was a few weeks ago with no sweat in the underlying software, so I wouldn��t count it out.������أ�˫������ʲô����һ����������ǰ��û�к�ˮ�ڱ��������������Ҳ���ָ���� (But then again, I��m biased. :)) ���������ٴΣ��Һ�ʧ֮ƫ�ġ� �� �� ��
May 29th, 2006 at 11:12 pm 2006��5��29��������11ʱ12��
Matt,���أ�
Good to see you here.�ã���������㡣
I think the core problem is the volume of spam.����Ϊ���ĵ������������ʼ������� It pretty much prevents anyone from manually checking the Akismet queue.������Է�ֹ�κ��˴��ֶ����akismet�����С� As a result the system, as I understand, cannot benefit from user input.���ڸ�ϵͳ��������֪�������ܻ����û����롣 As of now I have over 8000 spam (hopefully) comments in my Akismet queue.����Ŀǰ���ѳ���8000�����ʼ���ϣ���������ҵ�akismet�����С� I have to hope that they are all spam as I cannot manually check them.��ϣ�����Ƕ��������ʼ��������Ҳ����ֶ���顣
I do not doubt that you have made a robust system.�Ҳ�������������ǿ����ϵͳ�� What I am however concerned is the usefullness of the system when it doesn��t get collaborative human input helping its classification.ʲô�����ҹ��ĵ���usefullness��ϵͳʱ��������������Ͷ�룬��������ࡣ
August 16th, 2006 at 11:52 am 2006��8��16��������11ʱ52��
Try This�������
http://cavemonkey50.com/code/akismet-spam-count/
October 6th, 2006 at 3:15 pm 2006��10��6������3ʱ15��
[...] Akismet �� one knock [...] [ �� �� ] akismet -һ��[ �� �� ]
August 1st, 2007 at 5:57 pm 2007��8��1��������5ʱ57��
You are right - no way to check them all but whenever I do review the first page of spam (or crawl through the actual database) I never find false positives.������ȷ��-û�а취���Լ���������У���ÿ���������ֵĵ�һҳ�ϵ������ʼ��������ͨ��ʵ�ʵ���ݿ⣩�Ҵ���û�з��ּ����ԡ� Once you dig through you��ll find they are actually spam.һ������ͨ����ᷢ��������ʵ�������ʼ��� Don��t be fooled by all the ��great site, thanks�� posts - their goal is to train Akismet into thinking the poster is good and then they have a better chance of getting their spam through.��Ҫ����Ū�����С�ΰ�����վ����л����ְλ-���ǵ�Ŀ����ѵ��a kismet��˼�뺣���Ǻõģ�Ȼ��������һ����õĻ�������ǵ������ʼ�ͨ��