Sunset and Fate of Java ��v�Ƃ̉^�����W����
Sun Microsystem (SUNW) is down in many sense of the word.�T���}�C�N���V�X�e���i sunw �j���_�E�����A�����̈Ӗ��ł̌��t�ł��B The billion dollar question is whether it can come back again.���h���̂��ǂ����̎���͗����Ԃ邱�Ƃ��ł��܂��B
Sun's strength was in innovation.���z�̋����́A�Z�p�v�V�ł��B After the first big innovation, Sun rapidly became way too bureaucratic and less innovative.������̍ŏ��̑傫�ȋZ�p�v�V�́A���z�����܂�ɂ��}���Ɋv�V�I�Ȋ����Ə��Ȃ��ł��B Java was innovative but I think it was designed in vacuum, without considering viable revenue models.�W�����́A�v�V�I�Ȃ������A�Ǝv�����Ƃ́A�^��v����A�L�]�Ȏ�v���f�����l�����܂��B
Sun had (has?) high markup on its products which was good so long Intel chips were far behind Sun.���z�́i�͂ł����H �j���̃}�[�N�A�b�v�����А��i�ɂ́A�C���e���̃`�b�v���ǂ��̂Œ�����������đ��z�̂ł��B It was more focused in meeting the revenue goals without reacting rapidly to market dynamics.����͑��̉�c���𒆐S�Ɏ�v�ڕW���s��ɋ}���ɔ������͊w�ł��B
A company like Apple (during Job's era) innovates continuously to stay ahead.�A�b�v���̂悤�ȉ�ЂŁi���Ɏd���̎���j�v�V�p���I�ɂ��؍ݐ�ցB So does Oracle which also does a great job of focusing on its core competency.����̓I���N���ɂ��傫�Ȏd���͂��̒��j�ƂȂ�\�͂ɏœ_�ĂĂ��܂��B Sun's core competency is in Solaris and Sparc.���z�̒��j�ƂȂ�\�͂́A Solaris��SPARC�̂ł��B It decided, without strong logical underpinnings, to open source Solaris, thereby drastically reducing its net value.���Ƃ����߂��A�Ƌ��͂Ș_���I��Ղ��I�[�v���\�[�XSolaris�̏ꍇ�A�����啝�ɍ팸����ƃl�b�g�l�ł��B
So what are the legs on which Sun can rise again?����͉��ł��r�̏�ő��z�͍Ăя㏸�ł����H I can't see many.���̑������Q�Ƃ��邱�Ƃ͂ł��܂���B Can you?���Ƃł����H
The key question to me is the fate of Java with slow but almost sure demise of Sun.��������̌��́A�W�����̉^�����������Ƃ������z�̕��قڊm���ł��B I don't think open source foundations can effectively manage and improve on this great product.�I�[�v���\�[�X�̊�ՂƂ͎v��Ȃ�����コ���邱�Ƃ���ʓI�ɊǗ����A���̈̑�Ȑ��i�ł��B And I wouldn't trust it with IBM or Oracle either.�M�����邱�Ƃ͂Ȃ��Ǝ��ɂ́A IBM�܂���Oracle�̂ǂ��炩�ł��B Microsoft is out of question.�}�C�N���\�t�g�ł́A�A�E�g�̎���ł��B
The other option is breaking Javasoft from Sun and making it self-sufficient with consultancy and java software services. javasoft����A���̃I�v�V�����́A���z�Ɣj�邱�Ƃ����������ɃR���T���^���g��Java�\�t�g�E�F�A�T�[�r�X�ł��B
Filed under��o����� Headline News�j���[�X�̌��o�� , �A Java Software Java�\�t�g�E�F�A , �A Microsoft�}�C�N���\�t�g , �A Open Source Software�I�[�v���\�[�X�̃\�t�g�E�F�A , �A Technology�Z�p | |
| |
RSS 2.0 RSS 2.0�� | |
Email this Article�d�q���[�����̋L��
You may also like to read��ǂނ悤�ɂ��邱�Ƃ��\ |





































February 6th, 2006 at 2:03 am 2006�N2��6��2:03�A��
[...] Angsuman discussed the fate of Java. [...]��Angsuman�W�����̉^�����c�_���܂��B [...]
February 12th, 2006 at 4:54 am 2006�N2��12���4:54�A��
about static simple programs�ÓI�ȒP���ȃv���O�����ɂ���
February 17th, 2006 at 4:58 pm 2006�N2��17���4:58 pm��
No offense, but that�fs kind of scam.���C�͂Ȃ����A���̂悤�ȍ��\�̂ł��B End of 2002 SUNW was about $3, now it is $4.30. 2002�N�̏I���sunw�͖�$ 3 �A���ł�$ 4.30�ł��B So who is down ? who���_�E���������߂ł����H And by the way Angsuman, aare you aware of Sun commercial JVM ?�Ƃ���ł�Angsuman �A�A�[�����m���đ��z�̏���JVM�̂ł����H
February 18th, 2006 at 12:47 am 2006�N2��18��͌ߌ�9:47
scam?���\�ł����H That�fsa strange use of word.����͕s�v�c�ȒP����g�p���܂��B I don�ft benefit from Sun going down.���z�̉��b���鎄�͉���Ă��܂��B I own stocks of Sun.�����g�̊����̑��z�ł��B However we have to face reality.�������������͌����ɒ��ʂ���B I have told exactly as I see it.���͎��̌���Ƃ���ł͂܂����������ł��B
Moving from $3 to $4.30 may seem big to you. $ 4.30����$ 3���ړ�����悤�Ɏv���邩������܂���r�b�O����܂��B IMHO it doesn�ft matter unless it breaks at least 5$, at which point institutional investors can begin investing again. imho�Ă��Ă��\���܂�����Ă��Ȃ�����A���Ȃ��Ƃ�5 $ �A���̎��_�̋@�֓����Ƃ̓������J�n���܂��B