I personally find我个人认为 the article by Richard Grimes on the state of .NET technologies文章由Richard格里姆斯对国家的。 NET技术 very informative.内容非常翔实。 It is comical to note some of the rants against him in the post and in the comments at这是滑稽地注意到，一些对rants对他在后，以及在评论 http://weblogs.asp.net/danielfe/archive/2005/02/22/378343.aspx

Some of it are plain hilarious like:一些它是纯搞笑，例如：

And really, let’s face it, every programming language has a problem.真的，让我们面对它，每一个编程语言有问题。 Yes, .Net isn’t the best, compared to the others, but it is pretty good, as in easy application development.是的， 。净额是不是最好的，相比其他，但它是不错的，因为在容易应用的开发。 Still, it’s coming up.还有，它的未来。
For me, I hate Java, and that’s my opinion.对我来说，我最讨厌的Java ，这就是我的意见。 Unfortunately, it has a lot of technical advantage compared to .Net, so I MUST use it.不幸的是，它有很多技术优势相比。 NET的，所以我必须使用它。 I dreadful fate. i可怕的命运。

Some comments on his encrypting the email, and so he not a believable guy!一些评论对他的加密电子邮件，所以他不是一个可信的家伙！ It however never occured to him when he was writing those incredible articles and book on .NET technologies.然而，从未发生过向他时，他正在撰写这些令人难以置信的文章和书籍。 NET的技术。

I really pity these guys.我真的很可惜，这些家伙。

Anyway instead of just responding viciously to anyone who has anything bad to say about .NET/VB (MS group of products), why not take the suggestions positively and try to improve?无论如何，而非只是回应恶毒的人谁有什么不好，说约.net / VB的（ MS组的产品） ，为什么不采取积极的建议和设法改善？

My experiences with MS products have been:我的经验与MS的产品有：
1. 1 。 They are easy upfront它们很容易的前期
2. 2 。 When you want to develop solid enterprise products with them they are a royal pain to develop, to maintain当您想要发展坚实的企业产品与他们，他们是皇家疼痛的发展，为了保持
3. 3 。 You are continuously on a forced upgrade path您是不断在一个被迫的升级路径
4. 4 。 Developing never becomes simpler over time发展中国家从来没有变得简单，随着时间的推移
5. 5 。 Horrible support!可怕的支持！ Their main concern is to ensure they get the money without even being able to answer whether the question is at all answerable by them!他们主要关注的是，以确保他们获得金钱，甚至能够回答的问题是否是在所有交待他们！

In contrast my experiences with Java (from late 1995) have been:相反，我的经验与Java （从1995年年底）已：
1. 1 。 Very simple to develop很简单的发展
2. 2 。 Very simple to reuse, to develop large scale products and maintain很简单，再利用，发展大型产品和保持
3. 3 。 Easy to debug易于调试
4. 4 。 Easy to distribute to wide spectrum of users including those on Mac and Linux容易发给广泛的用户，包括那些对Mac和Linux

I have tried both sides (starting from Basic, VB, C#, .NET, and now sticking with Java technologies) and I prefer Java technologies any day.我曾尝试双方（从基本的， VB中， C ＃中， 。 NET和现在坚持与Java技术）和我喜欢的Java技术的任何一天。

At the core as a programmer I look for what makes my life easier, makes better products easily and maintainably.处于核心地位作为一个程序员，我期待什么，使我的生活变得更轻松，使更好的产品，很容易和maintainably 。 I am not saying it is not possible with MS technologies.我不是说是不可能与MS技术。 It is definitely possible either way to develop.这是绝对可能的无论哪种方式去发展。 So examples of software in managed code is meaningless.因此，软件的例子在托管代码是毫无意义的。 The point is that it is comparatively much much harder.这一点是它是相对更困难得多。 And you can only know it when you have been at both camps.你可以只知道它当您已在这两个营地。