It has become a fulltime jobs of some morons to reverse hype Java for several years now.�t���^�C���̎d���������Ă��邱�Ƃ������‚��̃n�C�v�W������morons�����ɖ߂��ɂ͐��N�O�������ł��B First it was "Java is slow"�ŏ��̂��Ƃ́A " Java�͒x��" myth�_�b which was perpetuated.����́A���܂�‚��Ă���B It has since been�Ƃ���Ă����B debunked several times debunked���� over. 〜�𒴂��āB

Then it was "applets are slow" myth which unfortunately and erroneously got some hold with "marketing" types.��͂��A�����"�A�v���b�g���x��"�ƌ���Ďc�O�Ȃ���_�b�ɂ͂����‚��̃z�[���h��"�}�[�P�e�B���O"�̎�ނł��B

At the same time we had C# / J# / .NET (Microsoft make up your mind already) which was touted as the next best thing which never happened.����Ɠ����Ɏ�������C ����/ J�́� / �B����i�}�C�N���\�t�g���łɂ��Ȃ��̐S�̖��ߍ��킹�j�́A���̍ō��̂��̂ƌ��`����Č����Ă��N�������B

And now they are touting PHP against Java!�����č��ނ��PHP���`�W�����I PHP and Java are complementary in many ways. PHP��Java�͑����̓_�ŕ⊮���܂��B They are competing only in the minds of retarded few.�ނ�͋������邢���‚��̒x���̓��̒��ł݂̂ł��B

BTW: I am overlooking the mini hype about Ruby by Java failures.�Ƃ���ŁF���͌��n����̃~�j�n�C�vRuby��Java�̎��s�����܂��B Ruby-on-Rails has automated CRUD operations which has made some going ga-ga.���r�[-��- Rails�ɂ͑��삪��������CRUD�ɍs�����߂ɂ����‚��̃W���[�W�A-�W���[�W�A�B Look there is a shiny object behind you!�s�J�s�J�̃I�u�W�F�N�g��T���ɂ́A���ɁI

For the last time everybody - PHP is a server-side language for web which competes with JSP or ASP; not Java.�ŏI�X�V���Ԃ́A�݂��-P HP�́A�T�[�o�[���̌�����E�F�u�Ƌ��������J SP�܂���A SP;�����J ava�ł��B PHP excels in having rich set of functions. PHP�̖L�x�ȋ@�\���D��Ă��܂��B It has a poor object model and is definitely not well suited for OO development.���Ɉ������Ƃɂ́A�I�u�W�F�N�g���f���Ƃ͊ԈႢ�Ȃ��͂��J���ɓK���Ă��Ȃ��B I don't use PHP when I am looking to develop reusable components.��PHP�̂Ƃ��ɂ͎g�p���Ȃ��ōė��p�”\�ȃR���|�[�l���g���J�����鉽����{���Ă��܂��B
I have discussed the differences in detail in my earlier articles on this blog (see below).���͋c�_�̈Ⴂ���ڍׂɎ��̈ȑO�̋L�������̃u���O�i���L�Q�Ɓj �B

To understand the value of language you have to understand the fundamental philosophy and structure of a language which enables and encourages (not force) certain set of development actions which in turn leads to better / worse software.�l�̌���𗝉�����̂���{���O�ƍ\���𗝉����邱�Ƃ��”\�ɂ͌���̂����サ�A���i�i�́j�̓���̃Z�b�g�̊J���s�ׂɂȂ郊�[�h����P/�����̃\�t�g�E�F�A�ł��B In the end languages don't matter as much as people do.����̍Ō�ɁA�ł��邾�������̐l�X�̖��͂���܂���ł��B