Ellison Brookes developer in埃利森布魯克斯的發展 James Goslings thoughts詹姆斯雛鵝的幾點思考 agrees with James Gosling that Sun's strangle hold of the APIs leads to greater stablilty.同意詹姆斯戈斯林說， Sun的扼殺舉行的空氣污染指數，導致更大的穩定性。

This is true.這是正確的。 Too many cooks spoil the broth.太多的廚師破壞肉湯。
The problems with multitude of open source projects in the bazaar model (thanks to Apache, SourceForge etc.) is that it is messy like a fish market.問題與眾多的開放源代碼項目在集市模型（感謝捐贈給Apache ，在SourceForge等）的是，這是混亂的就像一個魚市場。 There is no single direction, no unified vision in the macro view.有沒有一個單一的方向，沒有統一的願景在宏觀的看法。 Many of these are just forks of a project because some developer couldn't get his pet idea implemented!許多這些都只是叉的一個項目，因為有些開發商無法取得他的寵物的想法實施！ In the process the same ideas get re-implemented over and over.在這個過程中相同的想法得到重新實施以上。

Imagine a real fish market.想像一個真正的魚市場。 Now multiply that by 1, 000.現在乘以1 ， 000 。 You have an idea of where this fish-market style of development is heading.你有一個想法在何處，這魚市場的作風，發展是標題。 It is extremely confusing to the users of the said projects.這是極為混亂，給用戶的說，項目。 Choice is good.選擇是好的。 Too much choice is almost equivalent to no-choice specially in our scenario.太多的選擇是幾乎等同於沒有選擇特別是在我們的情況。
Unlike a fish market it is not easy to choose a product by the looks alone (that's one advantage you have in a bazaar).不同的魚市場是不容易的選擇一個產品所期待單（即的一個好處是你有在一個集市） 。 When the stakes are high you have to evaluate scrores of products before you can decide and many of them may be just junk.當賭注高，你必須評估scrores的產品之前，您可以決定和他們中的許多可能只是垃圾。

I was recently looking for Open Source CMS.我最近在尋找開放源代碼細胞質雄性不育。 By the looks of it there are hundreds of available products, each with it own licensing model, own feature list, own way of doing things, own standards.所期待的，它有數百個可供下載的產品，每一個與它自己的發牌模式，自己的功能列表，以自己的方式做事，自己的標準。 At one point the cost of properly evaluating such choice becomes more than actually developing a custom solution.在1點的成本，適當的評估這種選擇變得更實際，比發展中國家的一種定制解決方案。 And in many cases it is today.而且在許多情況下，這是今天。