Vote 投票 0 0
NoFollow Coverage nofollow覆蓋
Angsuman Chakraborty日由Angsuman Chakraborty
March 18th, 2005 2005年3月18日
This post will be used to track people’s opinion on這個職位將被用來追踪人民的意見 nofollow . 。 If you have posted any article on nofollow, please provide me the link in the comments. The posts are in reverse-chronological order (latest post first).如果您有任何張貼的文章nofollow ,請向我提供的鏈接,評論。員額是在反向時間順序(最新的帖子第一) 。
- Favelet to spot nofollow anywhere favelet ,以現貨nofollow任何地方
- The "nofollow" Agenda “ nofollow ”議程
- WordPress 1.5 Plugin - Strip “nofollow” tag from comment URLs在WordPress 1.5插件-帶“ n ofollow”標記,從評論的U RL
- "nofollow" Fallout “ nofollow ”塵
- To "nofollow" or not that is the question “ nofollow ”或不認為是問題
- Google’s No-Google tag blesses the Balkanized web - The Register Google的沒有Google的標記,祝福該balkanized網-登記冊
- Preventing comment spam - The Original Article from Google which started this. 防止垃圾評論-原文章從G oogle開始。
Websites dedicated to nofollow:網站致力於nofollow :
Filed under提起下 Google谷歌 , , Pro Blogging贊成Blogging , , Spam Watch垃圾郵件觀賞 , , Technology技術 , , Web網頁 , , WordPress在WordPress | |
| |
RSS 2.0 2.0 | |
Email this Article電子郵件此文章
You may also like to read您也可以想讀 |




March 18th, 2005 at 4:10 am 2005年3月18日在上午04時10分
Shelley Powers at BurningBird has been particularly concerned that the “anti-spam” justification for nofollow seems to be a ruse; that nofollow is actually about giving more power to the A-list webloggers by allowing them to control which of their outgoing links will be recognized by the search engines.雪萊的權力,在burningbird一直特別關注“反垃圾郵件”的理由nofollow似乎是一個詭計; nofollow ,其實是賦予更多的權力交給一名單webloggers ,讓他們控制他們的外向鏈接將公認的搜索引擎。
See看見 http://weblog.burningbird.net/archives/2005/01/20/i-broke-nofollow for a lively discussion.一個熱烈的討論。
March 20th, 2005 at 12:13 am 2005年3月20日在上午12時13分
Thanks.謝謝。
September 8th, 2007 at 4:03 am 2007年9月8日在上午04時03分
i love i follow我愛i後續
March 18th, 2008 at 4:32 pm 2008年3月18日在下午4時32分
Thankss thankss
April 22nd, 2008 at 11:30 am 2008年4月22日上午11時30分
Thanks You感謝你