My experience with Jelly & recommendation on lightweight IMDB我的經驗與果凍和建議對輕imdb
I just read Hani’s experiences with axiondb -我剛才讀哈尼族的經驗與axiondb - The BileBlog該bileblog . 。 It echoes my sentiments with common’s projects, specially the maven enabled ones, minus his colorful language of course.它呼應我的情緒,與共同的項目,特別是行家啟用,減去他的色彩語言,當然。
I have been trying to get Jelly working for me.我一直在試圖獲得果凍工作對我來說。 I realized that the jar provided is not complete and it needs Maven.我意識到罐子提供的是不完整的,它需要行家。 I then proceeded to download Maven and incidentally also got it working with Ant.然後我接著下載行家順便也有它的工作與螞蟻。
I thought my troubles were over!我想我的麻煩,均超過了! Alas, I discovered a quite sometime later that one of the jars it needs to compile is not present, thereby preventing any build from happening!可惜的是,我發現一個相當一段時間後,其中的罐需要編制不存在,從而防止任何建設發生! I tried it with both Maven and Ant, with same results.我試圖與這兩個行家和螞蟻,與相同的結果。
The dependency list seems to be broken for over a month.有受扶養人的名單,似乎被打破,為超過一個月。 I am surprised that people haven’t fixed it yet.我覺得很奇怪人們並沒有固定的,但它。 Is anyone working anymore on Jelly?是任何人的工作不再對果凍?
Much as I like to use Jelly (I still haven’t been able to get it working) the stupid idea to download huge number of jars which I may or may not need is something that puts me off.雖然我喜歡用果凍(我仍然沒有能夠得到它的工作)愚蠢的想法要下載大量的罐,我可能會或不會需要的是一些把我趕走。 I can accept if they packaged it in a big fat zip file but not this way.我可以接受,如果他們包裝,它在一個大發zip檔案,但沒有這樣做。 Maven concept is good theoritically, practically its a pain.行家的概念是好的, theoritically ,實際上它是一種痛苦。
Yeah, I know its free but so is Tomcat.是啊,我知道它的免費,但如此的Tomcat 。 And look how simple it is to install Tomcat.看看如何簡單,實際上它是要安裝的Tomcat 。
At the end I have to admit, it was effort to not use colorful language against this product.在去年底我不得不承認,這是努力不使用色彩語言對這項產品。
My advice to Hani: Use Hypersonic SQL.我的意見,以哈尼族:使用高超的SQL 。 Its a pleasure to use.它是一種很高興能夠使用。 I am using for small projects and prototypes for around 3 years now without much of an issue.我使用的小型項目和原型為三年左右,現在沒有多大的一個問題。 I am still amazed at how something as beautiful can be built with so little code.我仍然感到驚訝,如何像美麗的可建與這麼少的代碼。
Filed under提起下 Database數據庫 , , Java Software Java軟件 , , Open Source Software開放源碼軟件 , , RDBMS RDBMS的 | |
| |
RSS 2.0 2.0 | |
Email this Article電子郵件此文章
You may also like to read您也可以想讀 |





January 25th, 2004 at 10:42 am 2004年1月25日在上午10時42分
Trouble is Hani’s “experience” with Axion is non-existent, and his comments regarding it are false.麻煩的是哈尼族的“經驗”與公理是不存在的,和他的意見,把它是假的。
January 25th, 2004 at 5:35 pm 2004年1月25日在下午5時35分
I don’t think you’re problems are Maven’s fault.我不認為您的問題是行家的過錯。 It’s idea of a local jar repository is as good practically as its theoretically.它的想法,當地罐存放一樣好,實際上作為其在理論上。 I agree you won’t realize it the first time you use it, but in a longer run.我同意您將不會實現,它在您第一次使用它,但在一個較長的運行。
The real problem is (like Cedric and Hani have pointed out): open source projects are more often than not unpolished.真正的問題是(如cedric和哈尼族曾經指出) :開放源代碼項目是更多的,往往不是未。 Without digging into the source (at least a bit) some won’t get you nowhere.沒有挖掘到的來源(至少1位)有些人會得不到你是行不通的。 Jelly may be a special candidate.果凍可能是一個特別的人選。 It seemed like a good idea a few months/years back.它好像一個好主意了數個月/年回。 But in the end it’s more of a tech demo (a clever one, no doubt) still looking for a problem…但在年底,它的更多的高科技演示(聰明的一,毫無疑問)仍在尋找一個問題…