The JavaFX Script Programming Language Tutorial by James Weaver at JavaOne 2008 was rather insipid.該javafx腳本編程語言補習由詹姆斯韋弗在JavaOne 2008年是比較平淡。 In my jet-lagged state, it was enough to put me to peaceful slumber.在我的射流落後的國家，這是足以把我和平沉睡。 However I had one burning question which I dutifully asked.不過，我有一個迫切的問題，我盡職盡責地問。 Unfortunately I didn’t get an answer.不幸的是，我沒有得到答案。 It was deferred for the end of session, while recognizing its importance (he was just being polite I suppose).這是推遲到年底，會議，同時認識到其重要性， （他只是被有禮貌，我想） 。 I didn’t have the energy to bear the whole session, I left.我沒有能源要承擔整個會議，我離開了。

The burning question is why we need yet another scripting language.燃燒的問題是，為什麼我們需要的又一腳本語言。 The syntax is very similar to Java, Javascript or Groovy.語法是非常相似的Java ， JavaScript或溝槽。 Either Javascript or Groovy could have been used (Groovy would have been my favorite) instead of inventing yet another @#$% scripting language.無論是JavaScript或Groovy是可以被用來（ Groovy是會被我最喜愛的） ，而不是發明的又一@ ＃ $ ％的腳本語言。

A new scripting language means a learning curve for developers.一個新的腳本語言，指的學習曲線發展。 With so many very similar scripting languages, developers are likely to get confused and more time remembering the differences than coding.如此眾多的非常類似的腳本語言，開發商很可能會感到困惑更多的時間記憶的分歧比編碼。 Overall it is a bad idea not to reuse already tested and tried scripting languages like Javascript or Groovy.整體，這是一個壞主意，不要再用已經測試，並試圖腳本語言一樣， JavaScript或溝槽。

And finally how the hell is Sun going to monetize JavaFX?最後，如何地獄是孫去賺錢javafx ？

BTW: JavaFX isn’t released yet.的BTW ： javafx仍未被釋放。 It is targeted for release on August 2008.這是有針對性的釋放， 2008年8月。