How Will Sun Profit from Java?如何將孫的利潤從Java ?
All throughout the JavaOne 2008 keynote presentation, I had the same nagging question, how is Sun going to profit from all these diverse technologies?所有在整個2008年的JavaOne Keynote簡報,我有相同的困擾問題,是如何孫前往利潤從所有這些不同的技術? In the end I don’t have an answer.在結束我手邊沒有一個答案。
Purely from business standpoint it doesn’t make sense.純粹從商業角度看,這是沒有道理的。 Sun emphasizes about Write once, run anywhere mantra with JavaFX, targeted for rich internet applications and mobile devices.孫強調,約一次寫入,運行在任何地方的口頭禪與javafx ,針對豐富的互聯網應用和移動設備。
Sun demonstrated several businesses which leverage Java, none of which contributes to Sun bottom-line.孫表現出幾個企業的槓桿Java的,沒有這有助於孫自下而上的路線。
Why is this important?為什麼會這樣重要?
I am as excited as any Java developer to know about the futuristic initiatives from Sun.我作為興奮,因為任何Java開發,以了解未來的倡議,從Sun 。 However if Sun as a company doesn’t survive, the same fate is in store for their technologies too.但是,如果孫作為一個公司並不生存,同樣的命運,是在商店為自己的技術太。
BTW: I couldn’t for some reason get too excited about JavaFX.的BTW :我不能因為某些原因過於興奮約javafx 。
Also I think Sun initiatives are more targeted towards new and cool as opposed to maturing the existing technologies and making it easier to use.此外,我認為孫的倡議是更有針對性的對新的和冷靜,作為反對現有的成熟技術,並使其更容易使用。 I think it is a big mistake.我認為這是一個很大的錯誤。
Filed under提起下 Headline News頭條新聞 , , Java Software Java軟件 , , Programming編程 | |
| |
RSS 2.0 2.0 | |
Trackback Trackback跟踪 this Article |此文章|
Email this Article電子郵件此文章
You may also like to read您也可以想讀 |





May 7th, 2008 at 5:27 pm 2008年5月7日在下午5時27分
Simple - Sun sells SPARC and x86 systems, running Solaris or Linux.簡單-孫銷售S PARC和x 86系統,運行S olaris或L inux。 Java lets them sell more hardware because the same network applications run on all of it. Java的讓他們銷售更多的硬件,因為相同的網絡應用上運行的所有。
Same with IBM, only they’re worse off - mainframe, POWER, PowerPC, and x86, running zOS, AIX, Windows (XP or Vista), Linux, Solaris, OS/400, and who knows what else.同時與IBM ,只有他們差-主機,電力, P owerPC的,和x 86,運行隔離區, A IX操作系統,在W indows( X P或V ista)的L inux, S olaris操作系統, o s/400,誰知道還有什麼。 They’re also very big Java supporters, and I’m sure would take over if Sun went under (they’ve contributed Eclipse, an embedded Java database, and a few frameworks as well as big parts of the standard and enterprise Java libraries).他們還非常大華的支持者,我敢肯定,將接管,如果太陽到下(他們已經作出貢獻的月食,嵌入式Java數據庫,和幾個框架以及大部份的標準和企業Java圖書館) 。
May 13th, 2008 at 9:54 am 2008年5月13日在上午09時54分
I heard the same argument before.我聽到同樣的論點之前。 However spending money on Java doesn’t directly translate to revenue for Sun.但是把錢花在華並不直接轉化為收入為孫。
It works for IBM better because they are in consulting business, which Sun is not.它的工程為IBM更好,因為他們是在諮詢業務,其中孫是沒有。 In consulting business you can get greater mindshare by releasing open source products like IBM does.在諮詢業務,您可以得到更大的Mindshare釋放開放源代碼產品如IBM是否。 Unfortunately it doesn’t translate so well with hardware as you can see with Sun.不幸的是它也不翻譯這麼好,與硬件你可以看到與Sun 。