How Will Sun Profit from Java?如何将孙的利润从Java ?
All throughout the JavaOne 2008 keynote presentation, I had the same nagging question, how is Sun going to profit from all these diverse technologies?所有在整个2008年的JavaOne Keynote简报,我有相同的困扰问题,是如何孙前往利润从所有这些不同的技术? In the end I don’t have an answer.在结束我手边没有一个答案。
Purely from business standpoint it doesn’t make sense.纯粹从商业角度看,这是没有道理的。 Sun emphasizes about Write once, run anywhere mantra with JavaFX, targeted for rich internet applications and mobile devices.孙强调,约一次写入,运行在任何地方的口头禅与javafx ,针对丰富的互联网应用和移动设备。
Sun demonstrated several businesses which leverage Java, none of which contributes to Sun bottom-line.孙表现出几个企业的杠杆Java的,没有这有助于孙自下而上的路线。
Why is this important?为什么会这样重要?
I am as excited as any Java developer to know about the futuristic initiatives from Sun.我作为兴奋,因为任何Java开发,以了解未来的倡议,从Sun 。 However if Sun as a company doesn’t survive, the same fate is in store for their technologies too.但是,如果孙作为一个公司并不生存,同样的命运,是在商店为自己的技术太。
BTW: I couldn’t for some reason get too excited about JavaFX.的BTW :我不能因为某些原因过于兴奋约javafx 。
Also I think Sun initiatives are more targeted towards new and cool as opposed to maturing the existing technologies and making it easier to use.此外,我认为孙的倡议是更有针对性的对新的和冷静,作为反对现有的成熟技术,并使其更容易使用。 I think it is a big mistake.我认为这是一个很大的错误。
Filed under提起下 Headline News头条新闻 , , Java Software Java软件 , , Programming编程 | |
| |
RSS 2.0 2.0 | |
Trackback Trackback跟踪 this Article |此文章|
Email this Article电子邮件此文章
You may also like to read您也可以想读 |





May 7th, 2008 at 5:27 pm 2008年5月7日在下午5时27分
Simple - Sun sells SPARC and x86 systems, running Solaris or Linux.简单-孙销售S PARC和x 86系统,运行S olaris或L inux。 Java lets them sell more hardware because the same network applications run on all of it. Java的让他们销售更多的硬件,因为相同的网络应用上运行的所有。
Same with IBM, only they’re worse off - mainframe, POWER, PowerPC, and x86, running zOS, AIX, Windows (XP or Vista), Linux, Solaris, OS/400, and who knows what else.同时与IBM ,只有他们差-主机,电力, P owerPC的,和x 86,运行隔离区, A IX操作系统,在W indows( X P或V ista)的L inux, S olaris操作系统, o s/400,谁知道还有什么。 They’re also very big Java supporters, and I’m sure would take over if Sun went under (they’ve contributed Eclipse, an embedded Java database, and a few frameworks as well as big parts of the standard and enterprise Java libraries).他们还非常大华的支持者,我敢肯定,将接管,如果太阳到下(他们已经作出贡献的月食,嵌入式Java数据库,和几个框架以及大部份的标准和企业Java图书馆) 。
May 13th, 2008 at 9:54 am 2008年5月13日在上午09时54分
I heard the same argument before.我听到同样的论点之前。 However spending money on Java doesn’t directly translate to revenue for Sun.但是把钱花在华并不直接转化为收入为孙。
It works for IBM better because they are in consulting business, which Sun is not.它的工程为IBM更好,因为他们是在咨询业务,其中孙是没有。 In consulting business you can get greater mindshare by releasing open source products like IBM does.在咨询业务,您可以得到更大的Mindshare释放开放源代码产品如IBM是否。 Unfortunately it doesn’t translate so well with hardware as you can see with Sun.不幸的是它也不翻译这么好,与硬件你可以看到与Sun 。