Free But Costly - The Open Source Trap免费,但昂贵的-开放源代码的陷阱
The title is inspired by Dr. Richard Stallman’s article -标题是灵感博士理查德斯托尔曼的文章- Free But Shackled - The Java Trap免费,但束缚-J ava的陷阱 . 。
Free as in open source software often doesn’t translate to free for corporations or even individuals.免费为在开放原始码软体,往往不会翻译,以免费为公司,甚至个人。 Yakov Fein discusses the雅科夫奥斯特罗芬党讨论 Open Source Gotcha开放源代码gotcha - “If you think that selecting an open source software will allow you to use it for free forever? -“如果你认为选择一个开放源码软件将允许您使用它永远免费? Think again.再想一想。 “. “ 。
Yakov discusses about the possibility of future versions of open source software like JBoss being non-free after acquisition.雅科夫奥斯特罗讨论有关的可能性,未来版本的开放源码软件JBoss的一样,被非自由后收购。 He touches upon “free” open source Jive which suddenly became他在谈到“免费”开放源码捷舞突然成为 $8500 per server八千五百美元每台服务器 . 。 The key point is what is free and in open source may cease to become so with future versions, which may be released with commercial licenses.关键的一点是,什么是自由和在开放源代码可能不再成为使未来版本,可能会被释放与商业执照。 I know scores of such products which were free in dotcom era but are now sold for hefty sum.我知道分数这类产品,其中免费在dotcom时代,但现在卖大幅总结。
BTW: Sometimes however the open source community may step-in and fork out the last open source version and develop new releases from it as has happened with Mambo.的BTW :有时候,然而开放源代码社区可能会逐步在交岔路口和出最后的开放源代码版本和发展新的新闻稿,从它作为已发生的与曼波。 As a corporation you cannot rely on that happening.作为一个公司,你不能依靠发生。 If you truly want to continue with the product you may either have to pay-up or devote resources for at least bug-fixing and some improvements.如果你真正想要继续与产品您可以要付出行动,或投入的资源,至少错误操纵和一些改善。
Microsoft manager talked about the微软经理谈到 true cost of Eclipse真正成本的Eclipse , the popular “free” java IDE. ,广受欢迎的“免费”的Java IDE中。 His estimation was 100K per seat which I think is somewhat overblown.他估计是100K的每一席的我认为这是有点过分。 It still underscores an important truth.它仍然强调的一个重要的真理。
There is a high cost factor associated with most open source software which includes (but not limited to) adapting and improving often poor quality product, understanding and documenting often poorly documented products, cost of support, maintenance, cost of security audit etc.有一个高的成本因素与最开放源码软件,其中包括(但不仅限于)调整和提高,往往质量低劣的产品,了解并记载往往不佳记录的产品,成本的支持,维修,成本,安全审计等。
In the end, with few notable exceptions (both in open source and paid software), you get what you pay for.在年底,与几个显着的例外(无论是在开放原始码及支付软件) ,您得到什么您支付。
Filed under提起下 Headline News头条新闻 , , Java Software Java软件 , , Open Source Software开放源码软件 | |
| |
RSS 2.0 2.0 | |
Email this Article电子邮件此文章
You may also like to read您也可以想读 |





February 13th, 2006 at 2:02 am 2006年2月13日在上午02时02分
[...] Angsuman discussed “The Open Source Trap”. [ … … ]由Angsuman讨论“开放原始码陷阱” 。 [...] [ … … ]
February 15th, 2006 at 9:04 pm 2006年2月15日在下午9点04分
I suppose some people pick open source software because it is free, but some of us prefer it because of the community of support that gathers around the best software.我想,有些人选择开放源码软件,因为它是免费的,但是我们有些人喜欢它是因为社会的支持,收集周围的最佳软件。
Open source is only a liability when the quality is low and/or community support is low.开放源码只是一种责任时,质量低和/或社区的支持是低。 Doing research will help clarify those considerations.做研究将有助于澄清这些因素。
February 15th, 2006 at 9:43 pm 2006年2月15日在下午9点43分
> Doing research will help clarify those considerations. >所做的研究将有助于澄清这些因素。
Consider choosing a CMS.考虑选择一个细胞质雄性不育。 It has over 100 OSS implementations.它拥有100多个开放源码软件的实现。 Don’t you think at some point the cost of research tips (especially with poorly documented projects) the cost of purchasing a known high quality software?难道你们不认为在一些点的成本,研究提示(尤其是不良记录的项目)的费用购买一个已知的高品质的软件? I have had that experience quite a number of times.我有经验,相当数量的时代。
March 16th, 2007 at 11:55 pm 2007年3月16日在下午11时55分
Yep. yep 。
most of the time while using opensource softwares大部分的时间,而使用开源软件
documentation and support is the first problem, one will have to spend for it文件和支持是第一个问题,一便须花费为它
sudhir
July 31st, 2007 at 7:53 pm 2007年7月31日在下午7点53分
“Microsoft manager talked about the true cost of Eclipse, the popular “free” java IDE. “微软经理谈到的真正成本偏食,广受欢迎的”免费“的Java IDE中。 His estimation was 100K per seat which I think is somewhat overblown.他估计是100K的每一席的我认为这是有点过分。 It still underscores an important truth.”它仍然强调了一个重要的真理“ 。
citing from liked article (omitted parts don’t change the meaning i just didn’t want copy it all):为由,从喜欢的文章(省略部分不改变的意思,我只是不想将它复制所有) :
“When he added it up, the cost of using VS 2005 was over $30,000 versus more than $100,000 for Eclipse-based applications. “当他补充说起来,使用成本比2005年超过$ 30000银两以上十点○万美元为基于Eclipse的应用程序。
…. … … 。
Get over it Microsoft!获得超过它的Microsoft !
…. … … 。
I have used it successfully for many years.我曾用它成功了很多年。 Today Eclipse is a truly polished product and gives any IDE (free or costly or outrageously costly like Visual Studio) a run for its money.今天的Eclipse是一个真正的抛光产品,并给出任何的IDE (免费或昂贵或悍然昂贵一样的Visual Studio )来说,其钱。
….” … … “ 。
well … what to say …以及…该说些什么…
“‘Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.’ - Albert Einstein” “任何人从来没有谁犯了一个错误,从来没有尝试什么新的东西。 ' -爱因斯坦”