Crossing the chasm for millions of VB developers过路的鸿沟以百万计的VB的发展
Hundreds of influential Visual Basic developers (recognized by数百名有影响力的Visual Basic开发（认可 Microsoft微软 ’s Most Valuable Professional program) have signed a petition demanding '最宝贵的专业计划）已签署了一份请愿书，要求 Microsoft微软 should continue supporting Visual Basic (classic) as it is doing for C++.应继续支持的Visual Basic （经典） ，因为这是做好为C + + 。
Microsoft’s plan is to end support for Visual Basic and force a transition of millions of VB developers to VB.NET or other微软的计划是要停止支持Visual Basic和部队的一个过渡以百万计的VB的开发vb.net或其他 .NET 。净额 languages.语文。 However their most valued customers do not agree.不过他们最重视的客户不同意。 They contend that despite the similarity in name VB and VB.NET are significantly different languages and would require extensive training and investment for IT department.他们争辩说，虽然名称相似，在VB和vb.net是显着不同的语言和将需要大量的培训和投资的IT部门。 The decision to migrate should be left to the customers and not forced upon them.决定迁移问题应留给顾客，而不是强加。 Unless Microsoft decides to back down, which seems unlikely, there is a big transition ahead of these developers and very soon (end of this month).除非微软决定将回落，这似乎不大可能，有一个大的转型期提前，这些开发商和很快（本月底） 。
This is a time for the millions of VB developers worldwide to take a close and hard look at the several options available to them.这是一个时间，以百万计的VB的发展在全世界采取紧密和认真研究的几个可供选择的方案给他们。
Pages: 1 页数： 1 2
Filed under提起下 .NET 。净额 , ， Java Software Java软件 , ， Microsoft微软 | | 
| | 
RSS 2.0 2.0 | | 
Email this Article电子邮件此文章
You may also like to read您也可以想读 |
March 14th, 2005 at 5:22 pm 2005年3月14日在下午5时22分
If you have read any material about VB.NET you would know that it IS object oriented and modern and well supported in the Windows environment.如果您有任何阅读材料约vb.net你会知道这是面向对象和现代和支持，以及在Windows环境下。 That’s the point… VB.NET is all these things.这一点， … vb.net是所有这些东西。 VB 6.0 is not. VB的6.0是没有。 Therefore changing to VB.NET will give the same benefits as C# or Java and the syntax is more familiar to former VB6 programmers.因此，转变为vb.net将给予同样的福利，作为C ＃或Java和语法是较为熟悉的前VB6的程序员。
You are raising the same point that hundreds of VB.NET programmers are raising, the programmers that didn’t sign the petition, the ones that have already switched to .NET.你提出相同点，有数以百计的vb.net的编程人员正在提高，程序员没有签署请愿书，那些已转用。净。
The real choice is whether to continue with COM development (therefore staying with VB6) or move to either Java or .NET真正的选择是是否继续发展的COM （因此，在下榻的与维生素B6 ） ，或提出任何Java或。净额
March 14th, 2005 at 5:23 pm 2005年3月14日在下午5时23分
If you have read any material about VB.NET you would know that it IS object oriented and modern and well supported in the Windows environment.如果您有任何阅读材料约vb.net你会知道这是面向对象和现代和支持，以及在Windows环境下。 That’s the point… VB.NET is all these things.这一点， … vb.net是所有这些东西。 VB 6.0 is not. VB的6.0是没有。 Therefore changing to VB.NET will give the same benefits as C# or Java and the syntax is more familiar to former VB6 programmers.因此，转变为vb.net将给予同样的福利，作为C ＃或Java和语法是较为熟悉的前VB6的程序员。
You are raising the same point that hundreds of VB.NET programmers are raising, the programmers that didn’t sign the petition, the ones that have already switched to .NET.你提出相同点，有数以百计的vb.net的编程人员正在提高，程序员没有签署请愿书，那些已转用。净。
The real choice is whether to continue with COM development (therefore staying with VB6) or move to either Java or .NET真正的选择是是否继续发展的COM （因此，在下榻的与维生素B6 ） ，或提出任何Java或。净额
March 18th, 2005 at 12:36 am 2005年3月18日在上午12时36分
True.正确的。 VB.NET should have been included in the list. vb.net ，应已包括在名单内。 My oversight.我的监督。 But the two points still stand namely:但有两点仍然立场，即：
1. 1 。 Long term viability in using OO development长期的可行性，在使用面向对象的发展
2. 2 。 Now that they have to make a decision do they really want to continue to stick to a single vendor (and single platform) solution?现在他们已作出决定，他们是否真的要继续坚定不移地奉行一个单一的供应商（和单一平台）的解决办法？ When they have to bite the bullet, why not go all the way for a vendor neutral, platform neutral and free choice?当他们有咬子弹，为什么不全力以赴的方式，为供应商中立，平台中立和自由选择？