The那個 paper文件 - “Grossly Excessive Penalties in the Battle Against Illegal File-Sharing: The Troubling Effects of Aggregating Minimum Statutory Damages for Copyright Infringement” by -“過度的刑罰，在戰鬥中，打擊非法文件共享：令人不安的影響，總額為法定最低賠償侵犯版權” J. Cam Barker j.凸輪巴克 argues that the file sharers sued by the RIAA have a認為文件共享控告RIAA表示，截止到有
constitutional right to pay much smaller penalties than the millions of dollars they can be liable for under copyright law’s minimum damages of $750 per song.憲法權利要付出小得多的刑罰比數百萬美元，他們可以承擔責任，根據著作權法的最低賠償750元，每首歌。

In the authors own words:在作者自己的話來說：

In this paper, I argue that there is a constitutional right to not have a highly punitive statutory damage award stacked hundreds or thousands of times over for similar, low-reprehensibility misconduct.在本文中，我認為是有憲法權利，不具有高度的懲罰性賠償的法定堆放數百或數千次的類似，低reprehensibility失當行為。 I point to the rationale behind criminal law’s single-larceny doctrine, identify the concept of wholly proportionate reprehensibility, and use this to explain why the massive aggregation of statutory damage awards can violate substantive due process.我指出，以背後的理據刑法的單盜竊的原則，確定的概念，完全相稱的reprehensibility ，並以此解釋為何大量聚集的法定損害賠償可以違反實質性正當程序。

I conclude that massively aggregated awards of even the minimum statutory damages for illegal file-sharing will impose huge penalties and can be constitutionally infirm like the punitive damage award of Gore itself.我的結論是，大量聚集獎項連起碼的法定損害賠償的非法文件共享會施加巨大的罰款和可以在憲法上一樣，體弱多病的懲罰性賠償的戈爾本身。 Yet practical and institutional reasons will likely make this norm underenforced by the courts, pointing to Congress as the actor that should modify copyright law to remove the possibility of grossly excessive punishment.然而，實際的和體制的原因，將可能使這個規範underenforced由法院，指出向國會作為演員，應該修改著作權法，以消除的可能性，過度的懲罰。

You can download the paper您也可以下載文件 here這裡 . 。