Christine Axsmith, CIA software contractor, was fired this week after she posted her views on the Geneva Conventions and torture at a blog site only accessible to those with a top-secret clearance.克里斯汀axsmith ，中央情报局软件承办商，被解雇，这个星期后，她张贴她的意见，对日内瓦公约和酷刑在博客站点不仅方便那些有绝密手续。

She had been employed by BAE Systems, a prominent defense contractor, to test software performance at the CIA.她曾受雇于由BAE Systems ，一个突出的国防承包商，以测试软件的性能在中央情报局。

On July 13, under her usual alias of “Covert Communications,” she posted an entry called “Waterboarding is Torture and Torture is Wrong” to Intelink, the intelligence community’s classified intranet. 7月13日，根据她一贯的别名“秘密通信” ，她张贴的文字，所谓“ waterboarding是酷刑和酷刑是错误的” intelink ，情报界的机密联网。 She mentioned in the entry that she had had “the sad occasion to read interrogation transcripts in an assignment that should not be made public,” and that’s reportedly what set off upper management at the CIA, BAE Systems told her.她提到，在入境，她不得不“可悲的场合阅读审问誊本的转让不应该公开， ”这是什么据报道，掀起了上层管理部门在美国中央情报局， BAE系统公司告诉她。

In an interview with the Post, Axmith, 42, described herself as an “opinionated loudmouth with a knack for writing a catchy headline.” She said she apologized immediately for the posting and expected a scolding or withdrawal of her blogging privileges–but never imagined she’d lose her job.在接受采访时与邮政， axmith ， 42 ，描述自己作为一个“自以为是loudmouth与诀窍写下了引人注目的标题。 ”她说她道歉，立即张贴和预期一骂或撤销她的博客的特权，但是没想到她要失去她的工作。

A CIA spokesman reached by the Post declined to comment directly on Axmith’s case.中情局发言人达成后拒绝直接评论axmith的案件。 He said the general policy for blogs is that “postings should relate directly to the official business of the author and readers of the site…CIA expects contractors to do the work they are paid to do.”他说，一般政策，博客是“张贴的，应直接关系到公务的作者和读者的遗址… …中央情报局预计，承建商做这项工作，他们是支付给做的” 。

via通过 Link链接

Getting fired for blogging has become such a common theme these days that you would expect people to be more careful.越来越炒鱿鱼的博客，已成为这样一个共同的主题，这些天来，你会期望人们会更小心。 Christine, a self-described “opinionated loudmouth”, clearly didn’t realize she was overstepping her boundaries.克里斯汀，自我描述的“自以为是loudmouth ” ，显然不知道她是超越她的界线。 I think CIA overreacted but then so does most big corporations in such situations.我认为美国中央情报局过度，但那么是否大多数大公司在这种情况下。