"�n�untru India, fears despre art.hot. experiment �ntindere rapidly g�t art.hot. media" Reuters & a cita verbatim by MSNBC

"numai �n�untru ad�nc religios �i superstitious India…" Reuters & a cita verbatim by MSNBC

Ce kind de t�mpit galben ziarist is this?

Cine acordat Reuters art.hot. right la spre categorize �i denigrate un �ntreg �ar� baz� on s�u incorrect �i biased vedere?

As un Indian, I ad�nc a nu putea suporta this piece de galben ziarist de la Reuters.

Galben ziarist, �n�untru �ort, is biased opinion masquerading as objective frac�iune. Pe deasupra, art.hot. practice de galben ziarist involved sensationalism, distorted magazin, �i misleading imagine pentru art.hot. talp� purpuriu de boosting ziare v�nz�tor �i exciting public opinion. It was specific indicative de doi h�rtii a �ntemeia �i popularized �n t�rziu 19th veac

Galben ziarist is ziarist that downplays legitimate veste �n�untru favor de ochi-catching faruri that a vinde mai mult ziare. It Mai feature exaggerations de veste sear�, a scanda-mongering, sensationalism, sau unprofessional practices by veste media organizations sau ziarist.

Art.hot. job de un ziarist is la spre report frac�iune �i unic frac�iune. Art.hot. frac�iune �n�untru this caz was that un simplu sat fat� was mislead by media ( galben ziarist) into believing that art.hot. lume was venire la spre un sf�r�it. Art.hot. media incorrectly highlighted speculations by ni�te doomsayers f�r� highlighting art.hot. negation de lor vedere by reputed scientists. As un result un s�rac t�n�r femei decided la spre sf�r�it ei via��.

So galben ziarist by Indian pres took unul via�� �n�untru Bhopal �i galben ziarist by Reuters conducere la spre denigrate art.hot. �ntreg �ar� by telling art.hot. lume that India as un �ntreg is un " ad�nc superstitious" �ar�! Bravo Reuters!

Have ace�tia ziarist nu �ampon? Cum a putea ei somn la noapte?

�n�untru NOU� mai mul�i oameni committed suicide pentru un much lumesc sear� patim� de halle-boop a veni. La that timp I niciodat� inim� that art.hot. NOU� was ad�nc religios sau superstitious. It was reported as simplu pu�ini nutcases deciding la spre a lua lor via��, chiar un isolated incident.

Ce este despre traditional media? De ce a face ei pounce upon fiecare opportunity la spre denigrate so- chemare " al treilea lume" �ar� asem�n�tor India sau China �i feed la spre already existing biases �i superstitions de la so- chemare " primul lume"?

Poate este timpul de plecare g�t ace�tia decaying bastions de la vechi pres asem�n�tor Reuters �i a mi�ca �nainte into art.hot. brave nou lume de blogs �i online media.

Pu�ini thoughts la spre Reuters ziarist despre India:

1. India Mai a fi religios ( �i I surely hope acesta este so) numai acolo e�ti a urma widely different religie �i beliefs �i de asemenea lot de Indian actively practice aethesism. �n�untru mention de aethesism ( acuza�ie) is ingrained �i referenced sear� �n�untru our so- chemare religios texts. Having said that �ar� asem�n�tor USA e�ti de asemenea ad�nc religios by �i mare �i so e�ti most alt �ar�. Ce is gre�eal� cu being religios?

2. Being religios has nothing la spre a face cu superstition. Eu am seen superstitions pretutindeni �n lume, religie sau nu religie. De ce a face oameni �nv���tor tinerel superstitions �i plain lies asem�n�tor Santa Claus sau dinte corect sau Halloween?

3. Art.hot. most import mesaj I nevoie la spre a da la spre Reuters ziarist is that don't a �nso�i la spre categorize un mare corp de oameni (1/5 de la lume population ultimul I a verifica) f�r� having ad�nc knowledge despre pe ei �i lor cultur�. Aceasta este tot plain cretin. Chiar art.hot. frac�iune doamn�.