Old-style database systems solve old-style problems; we need new-style databases to solve new-style problems.������ݿ�ϵͳ��������͵����⣬������Ҫ��������ݿ⣬�Խ���·������⡣ While the need for conventional database management systems isn��t going away, many of today��s problems require a configurable database system.����Ҫ������ݿ����ϵͳ�Dz���Զ�룬�����������ⶼ��Ҫһ�������õ���ݿ�ϵͳ�� Even without a crystal ball, it seems clear that tomorrow��s systems will also require a significant degree of configurability.��ʹû��ˮ�����ƺ�������������ϵͳҲ����Ҫ�ܴ�̶ȵ����á� As programmers and engineers, we learn to select the right tool to do a job; selecting a database is no exception.��Ϊ����Ա�͹���ʦ������ѧ��ѡ����ȷ�Ĺ��ߣ�������;ѡ��һ����ݿ�Ҳ�����⡣ We need to operate in a mode where we recognize that there are options in data management, and we should select the right tool to get the job done as efficiently, robustly, and simply as possible.������Ҫ������ģʽ�����������ʶ������ѡ����ݹ��?����Ӧ��ѡ����ȷ�Ĺ��ߣ��������������Ϊ��Ч���������ɴ�Խ�á�

An excellent article which explores the new horizons beyond traditional RDBMS.һ���ܺõ����£�̽�����µ���Ұ����Խ�˴�ͳ��RDBMS�ġ� Today we use relational databases for almost every requirements.���죬����ʹ�ù�ϵ��ݿ⣬Ϊ����ÿһ��Ҫ�� However as search engine domain have proven relational databases are not the best solution for every needs.���ǣ���Ϊ��������������Ѿ�֤����ϵ��ݿ��Dz�����õĽ���취��Ϊÿһ����Ҫ��

Today's databases have several useful modules bunched together in a single monolithic database management system which makes it hard to install, deploy and manage.�������ݿ��м������õ�ģ��bunchedһ����һ����һ�����һ�飬��ݿ����ϵͳ����ʹ������Ѱ�װ������͹��? In future databases should also become modular where we can pick and choose our functionality.��δ������ݿ⣬ҲӦ����Ϊģ�黯�ĵط������ǿ���ѡ�����ǵĹ��ܡ�

Read more�Ķ���� here���� . ��