Full Content RSS Feeds Compounding the Splog Problem? ��ü ������ �ǵ� ���� the ���̴� ������ �dz�?
It appears to me full content RSS feeds are actually helping and compounding the splog (spam blog) problem. ������ �װ��� ��Ÿ���ϴٵ��� �����ְ� ��ü ������ �ǵ尡 ������ ���� the ���̴� (���� ��α�) �������ֽ��ϴ�. Splogs or spam blogs are blogs which are created by using syndicated content of other blogs, automatically aggregated, to increase their PR and AdSense dollars. splogs �Ǵ� ���� ��α״� ��α� ����Ͽ� �ŵ����̼� �������� ���ϴ� �ٸ� ��α� �ڵ����� ���, ȫ�� �� �ֵ� ������ ��ȭ�ϱ� ���� �����մϴ�. Splogs don't add value to the system, rather devalue the whole blogging concept. splogs ��ġ�� �߰����� ���ʽÿ� �ý���, ������ �� ���� ��ü ��α� �����մϴ�. Splogs also make ���� splogs concepts like PubSub irrelevant PubSub�� ��ü��̾�� ����ó�� . �մϴ�.
Proponents like ������ ���� Dave Winer ���̺� winer and �� Scoble scoble prefers full content in RSS feeds. �켱������ ��� �������� �ǵ��մϴ�.
The upside is that viewers do not have to click again to go to the website to view the full content. the �Ųٷΰ� ��û�ڸ� �ٽ� Ŭ������ �ʾƵ��� ��ü �������� �� �� ����Ʈ�� �̵��մϴ�. They can view it directly in their RSS reader only. ���� ���� rss ������������ ���� �� ���ֽ��ϴ�. The downsides for the site author is that he doesn't have control over the layout of his content and also presents him with a challenge to monetize his offerings which he can do when the viewer comes to his page. �����Ͽ� �ش� ����Ʈ�� ���� �� ���°��� �� �ʿ䰡 ��� ���� �������� ���̾ƿ��� ������ �� �ְ� �� �� ����ϰ� ���� ������ �����ϴ� ���� ������ â���� �� ���� �� �״� ���� ���������� �� ���ֽ��ϴ�. Feed advertising is an option. �ǵ� ���?�ϴ� �ɼ�. However the success rate is not worth writing home about as far as I know. ���� ���� Ȩ ȸ���� ���� ������ ��ġ����� ������ �˰��ֽ��ϴ�.
The biggest downside IMHO is that such feeds makes it very easy to re-purpose them to create splogs which ultimately devalue the whole blogosphere. imho�� ���� ū �������� ���� �ǵ� - ��ǥ�� �ٽ� ���� �װ��� ���� �ſ� ���� splogs ��α� �ñ������� ��ü�� �� �����մϴ�.
A RSS provider (any blogger for example) has no active control over the usage. a rss ������ (��� ��α� ���� ���)�̾�� Ȱ�� ��� ����մϴ�. He can at most �״� �ⲯ�ؾ� ���ֽ��ϴ� add copyright messages to the feed ��ٱ��� ���۱ǿ� ������ ���� thereby alerting common public that his feed is being misused. �Ϲ� ������ ���� �ǵ�� ��? �߸� ���ǰ��ֽ��ϴ�.
What are the solutions? �ַ���� �����Դϱ�?
I suggested today ���� ���� ���� headline only RSS feeds ��� ���� ��� �ǵ� which can satisfy both camps. �� ���ִ� ķ���� �����մϴ�.
If you still prefer full content feeds you can use a facility such as provided by my ������ ��ȣ�ϴ� ��� ��ü ������ �ǵ带 �����ϴ� �� ���� ����� ���ֽ��ϴ� �� feed copyrighter plugin for WordPress �ǵ带 Copyrighter�� ���� �÷��� ���ӽ� wordpress to automatically add copyright notice and illegal usage notification to the end of content along with option to inform the original author. ������ �ڵ����� �߰� ���۱� ������ �ҹ����� �뵵���� ���� �ɼ��� �˷��ִ� ������ �� ���ڿ� �Բ��մϴ�. I plan to release a new version soon to make it harder for perpetrators to automatically delete such messages from the feed by simple filtering techniques. ���� �� ������ �� ���� ��ȹ�� ���ϴ� �����ڿ� ���� ����� �ǵ忡�� �̷��� ������ �ڵ����� �����ϴ� ���� ����� �ܼ��մϴ�. So far however no such attempts have been reported despite widespread usage. ���ݱ����� ���� �������� �뵵���� �ұ��ϰ� �� �õ�������Ǿ���ϴ�.
Filed under �ؿ� CMS Software cms ����Ʈ��� , Headline News ��� ���� ���� , Pro Blogging �������� ��α� , Tech Note ��� ��� ���� , Web �� , Web Services �� ���� , WordPress wordpress | |
| |
RSS 2.0 rss 2.0 | |
Trackback Ʈ���� this Article | �� ���� |
Email this Article ���� ������ ����
You may also like to read ������ ���� ���ֽ��ϴ� |




































November 20th, 2005 at 3:32 pm 2005�� 11�� 20�Ͽ��� ���� 3�� 32��
I appreciate your work. ���� ���� �ּż� �����մϴ�. But another option would simply be turning off RSS feeds. ������ �� �ٸ� �ɼ��� �����ϰ� �ǵ带 �����մϴ�. Control over content *must* remain with the author, else how can form be dictated and content monetized? ������ ������ *�ؾ� * ���ư� ����, �ٸ� ����� �����ϴ� ���� �������� ���� ���ֽ��ϴ� ����?
(Side note: I��m not sure when this idea that ��display is up to the end user�� took hold, but I��m certain that was the moment when content provision became a money-losing proposition. If you want my information, you can come to my site. Again, how can content be monetized in *any* other way?) (�� ��� ���� :�� ���̵� Ȯ������ ���� "���÷��̴� �ִ��� ���� �����"�� ��������, �� �� ���̾�� Ȯ�� �������� �����ϸ� �� -�� �Ұ� �� �������մϴ�. �� ������ ���Ѵٸ�, �̸� �� ����Ʈ�����Ͻ� ���ֽ��ϴ�. ��, ��� * ��� * ��Ÿ ��� �������� ����?)
If a writer^Wcontent provider remains convinced, for some reason, that RSS or Atom feeds remain a good idea, one option would be to enforce a click-through EULA before these feeds would be provided. �۰� ^ wcontent ������ ��쿡�� ���� Ȯ���ϰ�, � ������, �Ǵ� ���� rss �ǵ带 �����ϴ� ���� ���̵� �ϳ��� �ɼ��� ����ϴ°� -�� Ŭ���ϱ� �� ���� ����� ���� ����� ���� �̷��� �ǵ尡 �����մϴ�. It would be well to keep in mind the risks that go with it: loss of control over content, and loss of control over layout. �װ����� �������� ���ο� �ξ���մϴ��� ���輺�� ����� : �ս��� ������ �� ������ �� ���̾ƿ��� �ս��� ������ ���ֽ��ϴ�. Neither can be taken lightly! ��� ������ ���� ���ִ�!
Final note: It��s striking to me how prophetic Ayn Rand was. ���� ��� : ���� ������ �ε巯�� ������ �����ϴ� ������ֽ��ϴ�.