We did a performance comparison of我們做了性能比較 Angsuman’s Translator Plugin Pro Angsuman的翻譯插件親 with our competitor.與我們的競爭對手。 This is purely a performance comparison.這純粹是一項性能比較。 For the purpose of this comparison we ignored glaring differences like we provide tons of為的目的,這比較,我們忽視了顯著的差異,像我們提供噸 additional額外 features and functionality特性和功能 , full support, actively maintained, unlimited upgrades and that we support ,全力支持,積極維護,升級和無限的,我們支持 translation from each of 14 languages to 13 other languages翻譯從每14種語言向13個其他語言 and provide enormous customizality for each.並提供了巨大customizality為每個。 So let’s get down to numbers only.讓我們一起坐下來有多少只。

Hardware硬件

Pentium 4 3.8 GHz with Hyperthreading (enabled) and 1GB RAM.奔騰4 3.8 GHz的超線程(啟用)和1 GB的RAM 。

Software軟件

Operating System作業系統

Linux - Fedora Core 4 Linux的-的F edoraC ore4

Benchmarking Software基準軟件

ApacheBench, Version 2.0.41-dev apachebench ,版本2.0.41 - dev的

Web Server Web服務器

Apache 2.0的Apache 2.0

Test Condition試驗條件

The tests were done with caching enabled for both plugins but with cache cleared.試驗做了緩存,使雙方的外掛程式,但與高速緩存清除。 Test results are averaged over 100 iterations.測試結果是平均每場超過100次迭代。 The server load was minimal before the test as idenitfied by top.該服務器負載是微乎其微的測試之前,作為idenitfied由頂端。
Note:注意: Translator Plugin Pro caching technology翻譯插件親的高速緩存技術

All the plugins have caching enabled; testing with single request thread (concurrency = 1).所有插件已啟用緩存;測試與單一請求線程(並發= 1 ) 。
Criteria標準 Translator Plugin Pro翻譯插件親 Competitor競爭對手
Average Requests per sec (higher is better)平均每秒請求(較高的是更好的) 3.39 0.37
Average Transfer rate (higher is better)平均傳輸率(較高的是更好的) 278.55 KB/sec 278.55字節/秒 33.86 KB/sec 33.86字節/秒
Average Failure rate (lower is better)平均故障率(較低的是更好的) 0% 0 % 93% 93 %
Average Time per request (lower is better)平均時間每次請求(下更好) 294 ms 294餘 2725 ms 2725餘
All the plugins have caching enabled; testing with five request threads (concurrency = 5).所有插件已啟用緩存;測試與5請求線程(並發= 5 ) 。
Criteria標準 Translator Plugin Pro翻譯插件親 Competitor競爭對手
Average Requests per sec (higher is better)平均每秒請求(較高的是更好的) 6.59 1.29
Average Transfer rate (higher is better)平均傳輸率(較高的是更好的) 759.53 KB/sec 759.53字節/秒 118.84 KB/sec 118.84字節/秒
Average Failure rate (lower is better)平均故障率(較低的是更好的) 0% 0 % 91% 91 %
Average Time per request (lower is better)平均時間每次請求(下更好) 151 ms 151餘 776 ms 776餘

Limitations 限制
The testing process was in the same machine so higher concurrency number is likely to slow things down as the testing threads contend for the same CPU and resources.測試過程是在同一台機器上,使較高的並發數目可能緩慢下來的東西,作為測試線程爭鳴出於同樣的CPU和資源。

Conclusion 結論
Translator Plugin Pro displays consistently higher performance (read ~ 10 x faster in normal load) over its competitor.翻譯插件親顯示器一貫更高的性能(閱讀〜 10 ×以更快的速度正常負荷)超過其競爭對手。 More importantly Translator Plugin Pro had 0% failure rate in our tests while our competition had over 91% failure rate.更重要的翻譯插件親了0 %的不合格率在我們的測試,而我們的競爭已超過91 %的不合格率。 In my book when 9 out of 10 requests fail that software ceases to be a competition, you decide.在我的書時,有9個10個的要求,不能認為,軟件不再是一項競爭,由你決定。

The icing on the cake for me personally was when we realized that the translated pages served by該錦上添花對我個人來說,是當我們認識到,翻譯網頁服務 Translator Plugin Pro翻譯插件親 (avg: 151 ms) are around three times faster than normal untranslated pages (avg: 414 ms). (平均: 151毫秒)左右,快三倍,比正常的未翻譯的頁面(平均: 414毫秒) 。