§ Translator Contents翻译内容

We did a performance comparison of我们做了性能比较 Angsuman’s Translator Plugin Pro Angsuman的翻译插件亲 with our competitor.与我们的竞争对手。 This is purely a performance comparison.这纯粹是一项性能比较。 For the purpose of this comparison we ignored glaring differences like we provide tons of为的目的，这比较，我们忽视了显着的差异，像我们提供吨 additional额外 features and functionality特性和功能 , full support, actively maintained, unlimited upgrades and that we support ，全力支持，积极维护，升级和无限的，我们支持 translation from each of 14 languages to 13 other languages翻译从每14种语言向13个其他语言 and provide enormous customizality for each.并提供了巨大customizality为每个。 So let’s get down to numbers only.让我们一起坐下来有多少只。

Hardware硬件

Pentium 4 3.8 GHz with Hyperthreading (enabled) and 1GB RAM.奔腾4 3.8 GHz的超线程（启用）和1 GB的RAM 。

Software软件

Operating System作业系统

Linux - Fedora Core 4 Linux的-的F edoraC ore4

Benchmarking Software基准软件

ApacheBench, Version 2.0.41-dev apachebench ，版本2.0.41 - dev的

Web Server Web服务器

Apache 2.0的Apache 2.0

Test Condition试验条件

The tests were done with caching enabled for both plugins but with cache cleared.试验做了缓存，使双方的外挂程式，但与高速缓存清除。 Test results are averaged over 100 iterations.测试结果是平均每场超过100次迭代。 The server load was minimal before the test as idenitfied by top.该服务器负载是微乎其微的测试之前，作为idenitfied由顶端。
Note:注意： Translator Plugin Pro caching technology翻译插件亲的高速缓存技术

All the plugins have caching enabled; testing with single request thread (concurrency = 1).所有插件已启用缓存;测试与单一请求线程（并发= 1 ） 。
Criteria标准 Translator Plugin Pro翻译插件亲 Competitor竞争对手
Average Requests per sec (higher is better)平均每秒请求（较高的是更好的） 3.39 0.37
Average Transfer rate (higher is better)平均传输率（较高的是更好的） 278.55 KB/sec 278.55字节/秒 33.86 KB/sec 33.86字节/秒
Average Failure rate (lower is better)平均故障率（较低的是更好的） 0% 0 ％ 93% 93 ％
Average Time per request (lower is better)平均时间每次请求（下更好） 294 ms 294余 2725 ms 2725余
All the plugins have caching enabled; testing with five request threads (concurrency = 5).所有插件已启用缓存;测试与5请求线程（并发= 5 ） 。
Criteria标准 Translator Plugin Pro翻译插件亲 Competitor竞争对手
Average Requests per sec (higher is better)平均每秒请求（较高的是更好的） 6.59 1.29
Average Transfer rate (higher is better)平均传输率（较高的是更好的） 759.53 KB/sec 759.53字节/秒 118.84 KB/sec 118.84字节/秒
Average Failure rate (lower is better)平均故障率（较低的是更好的） 0% 0 ％ 91% 91 ％
Average Time per request (lower is better)平均时间每次请求（下更好） 151 ms 151余 776 ms 776余

Limitations 限制
The testing process was in the same machine so higher concurrency number is likely to slow things down as the testing threads contend for the same CPU and resources.测试过程是在同一台机器上，使较高的并发数目可能缓慢下来的东西，作为测试线程争鸣出于同样的CPU和资源。

Conclusion 结论
Translator Plugin Pro displays consistently higher performance (read ~ 10 x faster in normal load) over its competitor.翻译插件亲显示器一贯更高的性能（阅读〜 10 ×以更快的速度正常负荷）超过其竞争对手。 More importantly Translator Plugin Pro had 0% failure rate in our tests while our competition had over 91% failure rate.更重要的翻译插件亲了0 ％的不合格率在我们的测试，而我们的竞争已超过91 ％的不合格率。 In my book when 9 out of 10 requests fail that software ceases to be a competition, you decide.在我的书时，有9个10个的要求，不能认为，软件不再是一项竞争，由你决定。

The icing on the cake for me personally was when we realized that the translated pages served by该锦上添花对我个人来说，是当我们认识到，翻译网页服务 Translator Plugin Pro翻译插件亲 (avg: 151 ms) are around three times faster than normal untranslated pages (avg: 414 ms). （平均： 151毫秒）左右，快三倍，比正常的未翻译的页面（平均： 414毫秒） 。